Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Can racial disparities in optimal gout treatment be reduced? evidence from a randomized trial

BMC Medicine201210:15

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-15

Received: 18 January 2012

Accepted: 9 February 2012

Published: 9 February 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
18 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
9 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
9 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-10-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Medicine Service, Birmingham VA Medical Center and Department of Medicine, University of Alabama
Center for Surgical Medical Acute care Research and Transitions (C-SMART), Birmingham VA Medical Center
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine
University of Alabama, Faculty Office Tower 805B