What is the evidence base to guide surgical treatment of infected hip prostheses? systematic review of longitudinal studies in unselected patients
© Beswick et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 3 January 2012
Accepted: 16 February 2012
Published: 16 February 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew David Beswick|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|6 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew David Beswick|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|12 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|16 Feb 2012||Editorially accepted|
|16 Feb 2012||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-10-18|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.