Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

suPAR as a prognostic biomarker in sepsis

  • Katia Donadello1,
  • Sabino Scolletta1,
  • Cecilia Covajes1 and
  • Jean-Louis Vincent1Email author
BMC Medicine201210:2

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-2

Received: 29 July 2011

Accepted: 5 January 2012

Published: 5 January 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
29 Jul 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hector Wong
16 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jesper Eugen-Olsen
2 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emmanuel Douzinas
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Katia Donadello
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Jan 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Jan 2012 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-10-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles