Therapeutic potential of transplanted placental mesenchymal stem cells in treating Chinese miniature pigs with acute liver failure
© Cao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 September 2011
Accepted: 6 June 2012
Published: 6 June 2012
Stem cell-based therapy to treat liver diseases is a focus of current research worldwide. So far, most such studies depend on rodent hepatic failure models. The purpose of this study was to isolate mesenchymal stem cells from human placenta (hPMSCs) and determine their therapeutic potential for treating Chinese experimental miniature pigs with acute liver failure (ALF).
hPMSCs were isolated and analyzed for their purity and differentiation potential before being employed as the donor cells for transplantation. ALF models of Chinese experimental miniature pigs were established and divided into four groups: no cell transplantation; hPMSCs transplantation via the jugular vein; X-ray-treated hPMSCs transplantation via the portal vein; and hPMSCs transplantation via the portal vein. The restoration of biological functions of the livers receiving transplantation was assessed via a variety of approaches such as mortality rate determination, serum biochemical analysis, and histological, immunohistochemical, and genetic analysis.
hPMSCs expressed high levels of CD29, CD73, CD13, and CD90, had adipogenic, osteogenic, and hepatic differentiation potential. They improved liver functions in vivo after transplantation into the D-galactosamine-injured pig livers as evidenced by the fact that ALT, AST, ALP, CHE, TBIL, and TBA concentrations returned to normal levels in recipient ALF pigs. Meanwhile, histological data revealed that transplantation of hPMSCs via the portal vein reduced liver inflammation, decreased hepatic denaturation and necrosis, and promoted liver regeneration. These ameliorations were not found in the other three groups. The result of 7-day survival rates suggested that hPMSCs transplantation via the portal vein was able to significantly prolong the survival of ALF pigs compared with the other three groups. Histochemistry and RT-PCR results confirmed the presence of transplanted human cells in recipient pig livers (Groups III, IV).
Our data revealed that hPMSCs could not only differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells in vitro and in vivo, but could also prolong the survival time of ALF pigs. Regarding the transplantation pathways, the left branch of the portal vein inside the liver was superior to the jugular vein pathway. Thus, hPMSCs transplantation through the portal vein by B-ultrasonography may represent a superior approach for treating liver diseases.
KeywordsAcute liver failure Cell transplantation Chinese miniature pig Irradiation Placental mesenchymal stem cells Portal vein
Acute liver failure (ALF) is defined as the rapid development of severe acute liver injury with impaired synthetic function and hepatic encephalopathy in the absence of pre-existing liver diseases. The disease carries a high morbidity and mortality. Orthotopic liver transplantation is the most effective therapy for ALF, but it is highly intrusive, irreversible, and limited by a shortage of donor organs, high expense, and the necessity of lifelong immunosuppressive treatments [1, 2]. Stem cell-based therapy, a promising alternative approach, is currently a focus of research worldwide [3, 4]. Hepatocyte transplantation has been successfully reported in experimental animals as well as in some clinical human studies [5, 6]. However, this procedure, which requires a large number of functional hepatocytes, is also restricted by the lack of available organs for cell isolation . Novel cell sources are therefore needed to develop and improve the accessibility of cell-based therapies in hepatology. The preeminent candidate cells for this purpose are mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which can be obtained from various tissues, such as bone marrow (BM), muscle, tooth, periodontal ligament, amniotic fluid (AF), scalp tissue, dermis, placenta, adipose tissue (AT), and umbilical cord blood (UCB) [8–18]. Furthermore, isolated MSCs are multipotent and can differentiate into multiple lineage cell types including mesodermal cell lineages such as osteoblast, adipocyte, chondroblast, myocyte, and cardiomyocyte, as well as non-mesodermal cells such as hepatocyte and neurocyte . Besides, MSCs have been demonstrated to be less immunogenic and can induce tolerance upon transplantation . Due to their self-renewal capacity, multilineage differentiation potential and immunosuppressive qualities, MSCs are accepted as the most suitable source for cell-based therapy for liver diseases. Recently, their therapeutic potential in the treatment of liver injury has been evaluated. MSCs exhibited the highest potential for liver regeneration compared with other BM cell subpopulations in an animal model of hepatic injury . Studies have demonstrated the capacity of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) to differentiate into hepatocytes when directly xenografted to allylalcohol (AA)-treated rat liver . Additionally, Jung et al. reported that human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) were able to ameliorate liver fibrosis in a carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced cirrhotic rat model . MSCs from human umbilical cord/adipose tissue also have the potential to improve liver function in mice with liver injury [17, 24, 25]. Another promising source of MSCs is the placenta. MSCs from human placenta (hPMSCs) display characteristics similar to those of MSCs from bone marrow, but enjoy several advantages . They are free of ethical concerns, non-invasively accessible, abundant, and strongly immunosuppressive [27–29]. Placenta-derived cells also display multilineage differentiation potential and can be differentiated into hepatocyte-like cells in vitro . Moreover, hPMSCs exert an anti-fibrotic effect in a rat model of the CCl4-injured liver , and transplanted hPMSCs also ameliorate carbon tetrachloride-induced liver cirrhosis in mouse.
However, the therapeutic potential of hPMSCs in a large animal model of hepatic injury remains largely unexplored. In the present study, we isolated MSCs from human placentas and characterized their morphology, phenotypic profiles, growth potency, and capacity to differentiate into various lineages. MSCs were transplanted directly into pigs with acute liver failure induced by G-galactosamine (GalN) via two routes: the jugular or portal veins. The intra-portal cell transplantation procedure was guided by B-ultrasonography. After transplantation, their capacity to overcome hepatic injury was investigated.
Isolation and culturing of human placental mesenchymal stem cells (hPMSCs)
Placentas were obtained from donors at the Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital in China after informed consent had been obtained. The study used a protocol approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.
The placental tissue was washed with preheated phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2 ± 0.1, GenomSciences, Hangzhou, China), minced, and digested using 0.1% (w/v) collagenase type IV (Invitrogen, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Recovered cells and digested cell debris were filtered through a 100-μm cell strainer. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) obtained by lymphocyte isolation (GE Healthcare, Ficoll-Pague™ PLUS, Sweden) were cultured in special medium (MesenCult® Human Basal Medium plus MesenCult® Human Supplement, STEMCELL Technologies Inc., Vancouver, Canada) and adjusted to 2 × 106 cells in T25-cm2 tissue culture flasks (Nunc Flasks Nunclon™Δ with Filter Cap, Denmark) maintained in an incubator at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% (v/v) CO2. Approximately 4 to 6 days later, many colonies had formed. After achieving 60-70% confluence, adherent cells were trypsinized using 0.25% (w/v) trypsin/EDTA (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and re-plated at a 1:3 dilution. Placenta-derived cells were cultured continuously under the same conditions.
Surface antigen expression
Culture-expanded cells (passages 3 to 6) were washed with PBS-containing 0.5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) and their concentration adjusted to 1 × 106 cells/100 μL. Their surface antigen expression was evaluated by incubating with anti-human antibodies against CD90-phycoerythrin (PE), CD13-PE, CD133-PE, CD31- allophycocyanin (APC), CD29-APC, CD73-APC, CD105-APC, CD79B-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), CD34-FITC, CD166-FITC, and CD45-TRI COLOR (PE-Cy5- PC5) (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). After being labeled with antibodies in the dark at room temperature for 20 min, cells were washed twice with PBS. Two-color flow cytometry was conducted using a Beckman Coulter Cytomics FC 500 MPL (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA), and the data were analyzed using MXP software.
Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation
Adherent cells derived from placenta (passages 2 to 6) were plated at a density of 2 × 103/well on six-well multidishes (Nunclon™Δ Surface, Denmark) and cultured in special conditional adipogenic medium (MesenCult® Human Adipogenic Suppl, STEMCELL Technologies, Inc., Canada) as per the manufacturer's protocol. After 4 weeks, adipogenesis was confirmed by oil red O staining (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) mRNA detection. Human intraoperative abandoned adipose tissue and hPMSCs cultured in normal growth medium served as controls.
MSCs from placenta (passages 2 to 6) were plated at a density of 2 × 103/well in six- well plates (Nunclon™Δ Surface, Denmark) and expanded in special conditional osteogenic medium (OriCell™ hMSC Osteogenic Differentiation Medium, Cyagen Biosciences, Guangzhou, China) and media was changed twice per week. After 4 weeks, osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by Alizarin Red S staining (Genmed Scientifics Inc., USA, Shanghai, China) and detection of osteopontin (OPN) mRNA. hPMSCs cultured in normal growth medium and immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cells (hFOB 1.19 cell line, Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) served as controls.
Cultured placental cells (1 × 104/mL; passages 2 to 6) were plated in T25-cm2 tissue culture flasks (Nunc Flasks Nunclon™Δ with Filter Cap, Denmark) and four-well chamber slides (Nunc Lab-Tek™ Chamber Slide™ System, Denmark) with LG-DMEM (Gibco/Invitrogen, USA) containing 10% (v/v) FBS (Gibco/Invitrogen, USA) for 2 days. Hepatogenic induction was conducted as follows. The medium was changed to IMDM supplemented with 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF) and10 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor (FGF) for 2 days. The cells were then treated with IMDM with 20 ng/mL hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), 10 ng/mL FGF, and 0.61 g/L niacin amide and 1% (v/v) insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS) premix (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 10 days; the medium was changed every 3 days. Finally, cells were maintained in IMDM containing 20 ng/mL oncostatin M (OSM; St Louis, MO, USA), 1 μmol/L dexamethasone (Dex; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), and 1% (v/v) ITS premix for 10 days. For the next few days, cells were cultured with HEPATOZYME-SFM (Gibco/Invitrogen, USA). Cells cultured with low glucose DMEM (LG-DMEM) containing 10% (v/v) FBS served as controls. Albumin (ALB), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), cytokeratin 18 (CK18), and cytokeratin 19 (CK19) levels were determined by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR; and urea synthesis, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake, glycogen storage, and cytochrome P450(CYP450) enzymatic activity were assayed to evaluate hepatogenic induction on days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 after induction.
Cell samples were fixed in 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde solution at room temperature for 15 min. After being treated with 0.3% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and blocked in 5% (m/v) BSA, cells were incubated with diluted primary antibody against anti-human CK18 (2 mg/mL, 1:400; Abcam, UK), human AFP (1:200; Abcam, UK), human CK19 (1:400; Abcam, UK), and human ALB (5 mg/mL, 1:500; Abcam, UK), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primary antibody was detected using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1 mg/mL, 1:1,000; Abcam, UK) antibody followed by incubation with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride solution (DAB kit, Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA). Cultured human hepatocytes served as positive controls.
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Primers and conditions used for RT-PCR
Amplicon size (bp)
94°C/30 s; 55°C/40 s; 72°C/60 s
94°C/30 s; 58°C/40 s; 72°C/60 s
94°C/60 s; 64°C/60 s; 72°C/120 s
94°C/30 s; 50°C/40 s; 72°C/60 s
94°C/30 s; 58°C/40 s; 72°C/60 s
94°C/30 s; 56°C/30 s; 72°C/60 s
94°C/30 s; 55°C/45 s; 72°C/60 s
Glycogen storage staining
Primary human hepatocytes were obtained from the Key Lab of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, P. R. China.
Undifferentiated and differentiated hPMSCs and primary human hepatocytes (5 × 105/well) were plated in six-well plates and cultured in either LG-DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS or HEPATOZYME-SFM (all from Gibco/Invitrogen, USA). Cells were stained with the periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Genmed Scientifics Inc., Shanghai, China).
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake assay
Undifferentiated and differentiated hPMSCs and primary human hepatocytes (5 × 105/well) incubated in DMEM containing 10% (v/v) FBS were labeled with DiI-LDL (1,19-dioctadecyl-3,3,39,39-tetramethylllindocarbocyane-low-density lipoprotein, Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, US) at 10 μg/mL for 24 h at 37°C. Cells were harvested, washed with cold PBS, and then stained according to the manufacturer's protocol. Uptake was subsequently evaluated by fluorescence microscopy (Olympus IX81, Japan).
Undifferentiated and differentiated hPMSCs and primary human hepatocytes (5 × 105/well) were cultured for 24 h in HepatoZYME-SFM (serum-free, no phenol red, Gibco®, Invitrogen™, USA) supplemented with 0.9 mmol/L ammonium chloride (NH4Cl, Bio Basic Inc., NY, USA). Supernatants were collected, centrifuged, and urea levels were measured in 96-well plates (Nunclon™Δ Surface, Denmark) at 430 nm by a spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter® Multimode Detector DTX880, Beckman Coulter, Inc.), according to the instructions of the QuantiChrom™ urea assay kit (DIUR-500, BioAssay Systems, CA, USA).
Determination of cytochrome P450 activity
Undifferentiated and differentiated hPMSCs and primary human hepatocytes (5 × 105/well) were plated in six-well plates and cultured in either LG-DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS or HEPATOZYME-SFM (all from Gibco/Invitrogen, USA), both with 10 μM rifampicin for 48 h. The media were then changed to IMDM containing a luminogenic CYP substrate (luciferin-PFBE, 50 μM, 1:40 dilution) for 24 h. Intracellular CYP enzyme activities were assessed by assaying luciferin production, according to the manufacturer's instructions (P450-Glo™ CYP3A4 assay with leciferin-PFBE, Promega, USA). Luciferase activity was expressed as relative luminescence units (RLU).
hPMSCs from the placenta (passages 3 to 6) were seeded in T175-cm2 tissue culture flasks (Nunc Flasks Nunclon™Δ with Filter Cap, Denmark). After achieving 70-80% confluence, cells were irradiated with 30 Gy at room temperature using six MV X-rays (500 Mu/min, total of 2890 Mu) from a Varian 23EX Linear Accelerator.
The lethal effect of irradiation on hPMSCs was determined using an MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. Each group of cells was seeded at a density of 3000 cells per well in 96-well plates (Nunclon™Δ Surface, Denmark). After irradiation for 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, or 144 h, 20 μL of MTT reagent (5 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to each well, and cells were incubated for 4 h at 37°C and 5% (v/v) CO2. The formazan complex was dissolved in 150 μL dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich), and absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter® Multimode Detector DTX880, Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times. In cell growth curves, the optical density (OD) values were plotted as a function of elapsed time.
Cell-cycle and apoptosis analysis
The effect of irradiation on cell-cycle progression and apoptosis of hPMSCs was investigated by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Cell-cycle and apoptosis analyses were carried out at 0 and 6 h and at 3 and 7 days after irradiation treatment. For cell-cycle studies, cells were fixed with pre-cooled absolute ethanol (-20°C) and finally stained using a cell-cycle staining kit (MultiSciences, Hangzhou, China), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The distribution of cell-cycle phases with different DNA contents was determined by flow cytometry and analyzed using multicycle ANOVA analysis software. Cell-apoptosis analysis was carried out by flow cytometry using the Annexin V/PI apoptosis kit (MultiSciences, Hangzhou, China). The percentages of apoptotic cells were analyzed using MXP cytometer software. Experiments were repeated three times.
D-galactosamine-induced acute liver-failure (ALF) model
Male Chinese experimental miniature pigs weighing 10-12 kg were obtained from Beijing Agriculture University (Beijing, China). Animal procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Zhejiang University. All pigs were housed in an air-conditioned room with a 12 h dark/light cycle and received humane care for the duration of the study. For catheterization through the external jugular vein, ketalar (0.2 mL/kg) (Fujian Gutian Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Fujian, China) was injected intramuscularly to induce sedation. An auricular vein was secured and 2.5 mg/kg/h diprivan (AstraZeneca, Caponago, Italy) administered to achieve continuous anaesthesia. Catheterization was performed as described previously . Six hours after the operation, acute liver injury in the pigs was induced by administration of D-galactosamine (GalN, Hanhong Chemical Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) in 5% (w/v) glucose (pH 6.8) at a dose of 1.5 g/kg body weight via a venous catheter. Ultimately, all pigs without cell transplantation died due to GalN-induced hepatic failure, making sacrifice unnecessary. GalN-induced liver injury was identified histologically by a trained pathologist. Animals were considered to be dead when their heartbeat and breathing ceased and blood pressure could not be measured.
Experimental groups and cell transplantation
Twenty-four ALF pigs were randomly divided into four groups (n = 6 each): Group I, ALF pigs without cell transplantation; Group II, hPMSCs transplantation via the jugular venous catheter; Group III, X-ray-treated hPMSCs transplantation via the portal vein; and Group IV, hPMSCs transplantation via the portal vein.
Eighteen hours after GalN administration, hPMSCs (passages 3 to 6; 1.0 × 108 in 5 mL saline) were directly transplanted into the pigs via the jugular venous catheter or the portal vein. For intra-portal cell transplantation, an 18 G PTC needle (Hakko Co., Chikuma-Shi, Japan) with a guide wire was inserted into the left branch of the portal vein inside the liver. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia and guided by color ultrasound (Sequoia 512, Siemens, Germany). By injecting contrast medium SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy), the transplanted cells were seen to be distributed throughout the liver. When the guide wire was withdrawn, blood flow confirmed that the portal vein had been accessed. Then, the hPMSCs preparation was directly and slowly infused into the liver via the portal vein over about 5 min. For jugular vein cell transplantation, the same number and volume of hPMSCs were infused into the jugular vein via a venous catheter. All transplanted pigs were immunosuppressed by daily administration of dexamethasone (Hubei Tianyao Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Xiangfan, Hubei) (10 mg/kg/d) during the first week after the transplantation. Blood samples were collected for biochemical analysis at the following time points: pre-and post-GalN administration (18 h), 1 to 7 days after cell infusion, then every 2 weeks from the second week until death. Liver samples from surviving animals were harvested every 2 weeks post-transplantation using an automatic biopsy needle, and the livers of dead animals were directly removed by dissection. These liver tissues were immediately stored at -80°C for molecular detection or fixed in 10% (v/v) formalin for histological and immunohistochemical analysis.
Blood samples were obtained from each pig and centrifuged for 10 min at 1751 × g (Sorvall® Biofuge Stratos, Thermo, Germany) and serum was collected. Concentrations of liver injury markers, such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin(TBIL), and total bile acids (TBA) were measured with an automated biochemical analyzer (Abbott Aeroset, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA). All samples were run in triplicate.
Cytokine level measurement
Supernatants of hPMSCs (passages 3 to 6), hPMSCs co-cultured with 1 × 106 lymphocytes from healthy donors for 24 h and serum from model pigs, were collected, centrifuged, and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) levels were analyzed using a human LIF platinum ELISA Kit (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Tests were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol and every sample was run in duplicate. LIF concentration (pg/mL) was determined by comparison with the standard curve.
hPMSCs (1 × 106) and their supernatants were co-cultured with PBMC (1 × 106) for 24 h. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) secretion was then assayed by ELISpot, according to the manufacturer's instructions (human IFN-γ ELISpot PRO kit, MABTECH AB, Sweden). The resulting spots were counted and analyzed using a computer-assisted AID ELISPOT Reader System (Immun Spot®, Cellular Technology Ltd.).
Pathology and immunohistochemistry
Pig livers were harvested at the indicated time points after cell transplantation, fixed in 10% (v/v) formalin, and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5-μm thickness) were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for routine histology. For immunohistochemical evaluation, the sections were heated in citrate buffer (0.02 mol/L, pH 5.8) for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase was prevented by immersion in a 0.3% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in methanol bath for 15 min. After washing, non-specific binding was blocked with 5% (m/v) bovine serum albumin in PBS. Sections were then incubated with diluted primary antibody against anti-human ALB (5 mg/mL, 1:5,000; Abcam, UK), human AFP (1:250; Abcam, UK), and human CK18 (1 mg/mL, 1:200; Abcam, UK), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Detection of primary antibody was performed using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1 mg/mL, 1:1,000; Abcam, UK). Peroxidase activity was revealed by a 3 to 5 min exposure to diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride solution (DAB kit, Vector Labs). The sections were then washed, counterstained with hematoxylin for one minute, mounted, and observed under a light microscope (TE2000, Nikon, Japan). Normal human tissue obtained under informed consent served as positive controls.
Detection of human alusequences by PCR
PCR for human alu sequences was performed to confirm the presence of transplanted hPMSC-derived cells in recipient pig livers. Total DNA of liver samples was extracted with a DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primers used were 5'-CTGGGCGACAGAACGAGATTCTAT-3' and 5'-CTCACTACTTGGTGACAGGTTCA-3'; samples were incubated at 94°C for 2 min and then amplified for 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing for 30 s at 60°C, and extension for 59 s at 72°C. The PCR products were analyzed by resolution on a 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Images were captured using a gel documentation system (Syngene GBox-HR Gel Doc System, UK).
Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences in serum levels of biochemical parameters were analyzed using a paired-samples t-test. Statistical evaluations of cell viability, cell-cycle distribution, and percentage apoptosis, urea synthesis, CYP-450 enzymatic activity, LIF, and IFN-γ secretion were performed using a t-test. Animal survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier log rank method. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed with SPSS ver. 16.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Morphology and phenotype profiles of hPMSCs
Adipogenic differentiation potential of hPMSCs
Osteogenic differentiation potential of hPMSCs
hPMSCs were cultured for 4 weeks in osteogenic medium, and osteogenic differentiation was assessed by Alizarin Red S staining and bone-specific gene (OPN) mRNA detection. Differentiated hPMSCs and osteoblast formed bone nodules and stained positive, whereas hPMSCs cultured in normal growth medium showed no positive staining (Figure 3D-G). Osteogenic differentiation of hPMSCs was further confirmed by OPN expression, as determined by RT-PCR (Figure 3I).
Hepatic differentiation potential of hPMSCs
Effect of X-ray irradiation on the viability and cell-cycle progression of hPMSCs
Survival of ALF pigs transplanted with hPMSCs
Restoration of liver functions in ALF pigs transplanted with hPMSCs
Cytokine secretion and immunoregulation of transplanted hPMSCs
ELISpot assay revealed that hPMSCs themselves did not secret IFN-γ, but they could stimulate PBMCs to secret IFN-γ (Figure 10B).
Therefore, hPMSCs may contribute to therapeutic effects in ALF models through immunoregulation.
Histological features of the ALF pig livers transplanted with hPMSCs
Fate of transplanted hPMSCs in ALF pig livers
To identify transplanted human cells in recipient pigs, genomic DNA was extracted from recipient livers, and human-specific alu repeat sequences were amplified by PCR (Figure 13B). On the second day following cell injection, weak expression of human alu sequences was observed in Group IV (lane 2), which was enhanced on day 4 (lane 3). This human gene mark was expressed at a high level beginning on day 7 (lane 4), followed by continuous expression up to 156 days (lanes 5 and 6). Weak expression of this gene was also detected in Group III 1 day after cell transplantation (lane 7), but became undetectable beginning on day 3 (lane 8). There was no evidence of expression at any time point in Groups I and II (lanes 9, 10, and 11).
According to the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT), MSCs are defined by their expression of CD105, CD73, and CD90 and lack of expression of CD45, CD34, CD14 or CD11b, CD79a or CD19, and HLA-DR. Additionally, they usually differentiate to osteoblasts and adipocytes in vitro . These data were based on plastic-adherent cells isolated from BM and some other tissues. Our data revealed that besides having adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential in vitro, MSCs from the placenta expressed high levels of CD73, CD90, CD13, and CD29, but not hematopoietic cell markers such as CD45, CD34, and CD133. The different phenotype profiles of MSCs from the BM and placenta indicates the difference in their biological properties. Also, hPMSCs had hepatic differentiation potential in vitro, characterized by the expression of ALB, AFP, CK18, and CK19, production of urea, glycogen storage, and LDL uptake. MSCs from the placenta may be an excellent source for liver disease therapeutics because they are obtained easily, exhibit a wide variety of favorable properties, and can be expanded on a large scale [26, 30, 34, 35].
Comparing with primary human hepatocytes, hepatocyte-like cells derived from hPMSCs showed much lower levels of LDL uptake and CYP-450 enzymatic activity. Since hepatocytes in intact liver are maintained in a three-dimensional environment and supported by surrounding cells such as Kupffer cells and liver endothelial cells, even primary hepatocytes will quickly lose activities during routine two-dimensional in vitro culture , it is therefore no surprise that the hPMSCs-derived hepatocyte-like cells cultured under similar conditions exhibited suboptimal hepatic activities. Nevertheless, our data clearly demonstrated the hepatogenic potential of hPMSCs that were employed for transplantation.
Currently, rodent models, including rat and mouse, are used to evaluate the potential of MSCs from the BM and placenta in repairing liver damage [37–41]. To explore the clinical value of hPMSCs, we used Chinese miniature pigs, a representative mammal, to establish a liver-failure model by D-galactosamine administration. The survival rate was significantly higher in the transplantation group than in the control group (66.7 vs. 0%). Additionally, the ALT, AST, ALP, CHE, TBIL, and TBA levels were significantly decreased in the transplantation group. To determine if hPMSCs moved to the injured pig livers had differentiated into hepatocyte-like cells, expression of hepatocyte-specific markers, such as ALB, AFP, and CK18, was investigated by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. Clusters or scattered cells positive for human albumin and CK18 were observed in recipient pig livers, particularly at 5 months after hPMSCs infusion. However, only positive staining for human ALB was observed in all liver biopsy specimens 6 weeks post-transplantation. RT-PCR analysis yielded similar results. In addition, AFP, a marker of immature liver progenitor cells, was detected by neither immunohistochemistry nor RT-PCR in livers from all hPMSCs recipient pigs. This may have been due to a limitation of the sampling method: because only a small quantity of biopsied liver samples was attainable, the probability of detecting colonized hPMSC-derived cells in these samples was low.
To verify that the observed effects were caused by transplanted hPMSCs but not the transplantation procedure per se or other processes, we further exposed hPMSCs to a lethal dose of X-rays (30 Gy) and transplanted them into Chinese miniature pigs as a control for transplanted cells. MTT and cell-cycle tests revealed that the viability and proliferation rate of hPMSCs after irradiation were significantly decreased; the percentage of G2 cells decreased from 5.76% to 0%. At the same time, the apoptosis rate of hPMSCs increased from 1.26% (no irradiation) to 3.7% (6 h after irradiation), 42.41% (3 days after irradiation), and 72.34% (7 days after irradiation). The survival rate of pigs receiving irradiated hPMSCs was significantly lower than that of pigs receiving non-irradiated hPMSCs (33.3% vs. 66.7%) but significantly higher than pigs without hPMSCs transplantation (33.3% vs. 0%). The following possible mechanisms may account for the observed effects of hPMSCs transplantation: (1) The transplanted hPMSCs may fuse with hepatocytes and initiate proliferation [42–44]. We found fewer ALB- and CK 18-positive cells in transplanted model pigs. Thus fusion of hPMSCs-derived hepatocyte-like cells with recipient hepatocytes cannot be excluded; (2) Homing of transplanted hPMSCs to the recipient liver which may differentiate into normal hepatocytes and result in replenishment of the hepatocyte reservoir [45–47]. Our data revealed that some cells expressed human ALB and CK 18 in recipient pig livers 5 months after MSCs transplantation; (3) Transplanted hPMSCs may support and activate liver progenitor cells, which then further initiate endogenous cell differentiation and proliferation [48, 49]; (4) Transplanted hPMSCs may secrete multiple cytokines and growth factors that will inhibit inflammation and accelerate liver restoration [50–52]. Although hPMSCs proliferation was significantly decreased after irradiation, these cells may participate in the repair of damaged liver through pathways 3 and/or 4. In fact, our LIF and IFN-γ data provide evidence supporting the immunomodulatory roles of transplanted hPMSCs [53–56]. hPMSCs transplantation can contribute not only to hepatocyte repopulation, but also to the improvement of the internal liver environment.
The number of MSCs transplanted is a key factor, yet little is known about the optimum dose. Most studies have used doses of 2-10 million MSCs per kg in small-animal experiments [57–60]. Some researchers think that the greater the number of MSCs transplanted, the greater the therapeutic effect should achieve. In this study, a total dose of 1.0 × 108 hPMSCs in 5 mL saline was safe when infused into the liver within about 5 min. No embolism occurred, but the exact correlation between the number of cells transplanted and their therapeutic effect needs further investigation.
Choosing an appropriate MSC transplantation route is vital for cell survival, induction of cell differentiation, and restoration of liver function. Routine transplantation paths include those through the spleen, liver, belly cavity, and peripheral and portal veins, each of which has disadvantages. MSC transplantation through the spleen is an accepted route, but the transplanted cells usually grow in nodules and hence contribute little to the restoration of liver function. MSC transplantation by hepatic multi-site injection involves the risk of damaging important liver vessels, causing severe complications including hemorrhea, portal hypertension, and so on. MSC transplantation through the belly cavity is simple but also involves the risk of inducing inflammation and fever and causing peritonitis and adhesion in the belly cavity. We compared the effects of transplantation through peripheral (jugular) and portal veins and our data suggested that both transplantation routes were safe, with no portal vein thrombosis. Additionally, hPMSCs were well distributed in the liver after transplantation through the left branch of the portal vein under guidance of B-ultrasonography. The long-term survival rate in the portal vein transplantation group was significantly higher than that in the peripheral vein group (66.7% vs. 16.7%). A plausible mechanism may be the high concentrations of cytokines, growth factors, and nutrients in the portal vein, which promotes survival, proliferation, and differentiation of transplanted hPMSCs. In contrast, hPMSCs transplanted through peripheral paths induce fever and adverse immune reactions. Also, a significant portion of hPMSCs may be lost when circulating through the lung . Therefore, only a small portion of transplanted hPMSCs entered the liver after circulation and immune damage, impeding the restoration of liver functions.
To determine whether transplanted MSC-derived cells colonized the pig liver, alu expression was detected by PCR. The alu repeat sequence is present only in humans and other primates. It accounts for 10% of the nucleotides in the human genome. The alu sequence is around 300-bp and is the most abundant sequence which appears at 3-4-kb intervals with moderate repetition. Because the alu family exhibits species-specificity, it can be used as a biomarker of human cells [62, 63]. In our study, we amplified the alu sequence to determine whether hPMSCs were successfully transplanted into the pig liver. A specific 224-bp sequence was detected at a number of time points, demonstrating the presence of transplanted human MSCs in recipient pig livers.
Taken together, our results suggest that MSCs from the human placenta could be used as an excellent source of transplanted cells for the repair of liver damage. Portal vein transplantation under B-ultrasonography guidance is safe and effective which could restore liver functions in pigs with liver failure to a substantial extent; however, the underlying mechanism remains to be further clarified.
acute liver failure
bovine serum albumin
Dulbecco's modified eagle medium
ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid
epidermal growth factor
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
fibroblast growth factor
hematoxylin and eosin
hepatocyte growth factor
human placental mesenchymal stem cells
Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium
low density lipoprotein
leukemia inhibitory factor
mesenchymal stem cells
phosphate buffered saline
peripheral blood mononuclear cell
polymerase chain reactions
total bile acid
We would like to thank the staff and the patients of Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital for providing the placentas and Key Lab of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health of China for providing the primary human hepatocytes. We are grateful to Dr. Senxiang Yan and Dr. Zhongjie Lu for their help with cell irradiation and to Dr. Tianan Jiang, Dr. Qiyu Zhao, and Mr. Linfeng Jing for the performance of cell transplantation and biopsy procedures. This work was financially supported by the Chinese High Tech Research & Development (863) Program (No.: 2011AA020104), Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.: 81121002) and the Technology Group Project for Infectious Disease Control of Zhejiang Province (No.: 2009R50041).
- Fiegel HC, Lange C, Kneser U, Lambrecht W, Zander AR, Rogiers X, Kluth D: Fetal and adult liver stem cells for liver regeneration and tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med. 2006, 10: 577-587. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00422.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Di Campli C, Nestola M, Piscaglia AC, Santoliquido A, Gasbarrini G, Pola P, Gasbarrini A: Cell-based therapy for liver diseases. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2003, 7: 41-44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stutchfield BM, Forbes SJ, Wigmore SJ: Prospects for stem cell transplantation in the treatment of hepatic disease. Liver Transpl. 2010, 16: 827-836. 10.1002/lt.22083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enns GM, Millan MT: Cell-based therapies for metabolic liver disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2008, 95: 3-10. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lorenzo M, Angrisani L, Santoro A, Di Salvo E: [Hepatocyte transplantation. From experimentation to therapeutic attempts in man]. G Chir. 1994, 15: 59-63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puppi J, Dhawan A: Human hepatocyte transplantation overview. Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 481: 1-16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gewartowska M, Olszewski WL: Hepatocyte transplantation-biology and application. Ann Transplant. 2007, 12: 27-36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Satija NK, Gurudutta GU, Sharma S, Afrin F, Gupta P, Verma YK, Singh VK, Tripathi RP: Mesenchymal stem cells: molecular targets for tissue engineering. Stem Cells Dev. 2007, 16: 7-23. 10.1089/scd.2006.9998.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, Reyes M, Lenvik T, Lund T, Blackstad M, Du J, Aldrich S, Lisberg A, Low WC, Largaespada DA, Verfaillie CM: Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002, 418 (6893): 41-49. 10.1038/nature00870.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young HE, Steele TA, Bray RA, Hudson J, Floyd JA, Hawkins K, Thomas K, Austin T, Edwards C, Cuzzourt J, Duenzl M, Lucas PA, Black AC: Human reserve pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells are present in the connective tissues of skeletal muscle and dermis derived from fetal, adult, and geriatric donors. Anat Rec. 2001, 264: 51-62. 10.1002/ar.1128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suchanek J, Visek B, Soukup T, El-Din Mohamed SK, Ivancakova R, Mokry J, Aboul-Ezz EH, Omran A: Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth--isolation, long term cultivation and phenotypical analysis. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2010, 53: 93-99.Google Scholar
- Jo YY, Lee HJ, Kook SY, Choung HW, Park JY, Chung JH, Choung YH, Kim ES, Yang HC, Choung PH: Isolation and characterization of postnatal stem cells from human dental tissues. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13: 767-773. 10.1089/ten.2006.0192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsai MS, Lee JL, Chang YJ, Hwang SM: Isolation of human multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from second-trimester amniotic fluid using a novel two-stage culture protocol. Hum Reprod. 2004, 19: 1450-1456. 10.1093/humrep/deh279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shih DT, Lee DC, Chen SC, Tsai RY, Huang CT, Tsai CC, Shen EY, Chiu WT: Isolation and characterization of neurogenic mesenchymal stem cells in human scalp tissue. Stem Cells. 2005, 23: 1012-1020. 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perng CK, Ku HH, Chiou SH, Chen IL, Tsai FT, Yang YP, Chang KY, Kao CL: Evaluation of wound healing effect on skin-defect nude mice by using human dermis-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Transplant Proc. 2006, 38: 3086-3087. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.08.146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- In 't Anker PS, Scherjon SA, Kleijburg-van der Keur C, de Groot-Swings GM, Claas FH, Fibbe WE, Kanhai HH: Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells of fetal or maternal origin from human placenta. Stem Cells. 2004, 22: 1338-1345. 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Banas A, Teratani T, Yamamoto Y, Tokuhara M, Takeshita F, Osaki M, Kawamata M, Kato T, Okochi H, Ochiya T: IFATS collection: in vivo therapeutic potential of human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells after transplantation into mice with liver injury. Stem Cells. 2008, 26: 2705-2712. 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Musina RA, Bekchanova ES, Belyavskii AV, Grinenko TS, Sukhikh GT: Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2007, 143: 127-131. 10.1007/s10517-007-0032-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bajek A, Olkowska J, Drewa T: [Mesenchymal stem cells as a therapeutic tool in tissue and organ regeneration]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2011, 65: 124-132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lysy PA, Campard D, Smets F, Najimi M, Sokal EM: Stem cells for liver tissue repair: current knowledge and perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2008, 14: 864-875. 10.3748/wjg.14.864.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cho KA, Ju SY, Cho SJ, Jung YJ, Woo SY, Seoh JY, Han HS, Ryu KH: Mesenchymal stem cells showed the highest potential for the regeneration of injured liver tissue compared with other subpopulations of the bone marrow. Cell Biol Int. 2009, 33: 772-777. 10.1016/j.cellbi.2009.04.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato Y, Araki H, Kato J, Nakamura K, Kawano Y, Kobune M, Sato T, Miyanishi K, Takayama T, Takahashi M, Takimoto R, Iyama S, Matsunaga T, Ohtani S, Matsuura A, Hamada H, Niitsu Y: Human mesenchymal stem cells xenografted directly to rat liver are differentiated into human hepatocytes without fusion. Blood. 2005, 106: 756-763. 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0572.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung KH, Shin HP, Lee S, Lim YJ, Hwang SH, Han H, Park HK, Chung JH, Yim SV: Effect of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a cirrhotic rat model. Liver Int. 2009, 29: 898-909. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02031.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Banas A, Teratani T, Yamamoto Y, Tokuhara M, Takeshita F, Osaki M, Kato T, Okochi H, Ochiya T: Rapid hepatic fate specification of adipose-derived stem cells and their therapeutic potential for liver failure. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009, 24: 70-77. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05496.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forraz N, McGuckin CP: The umbilical cord: a rich and ethical stem cell source to advance regenerative medicine. Cell Prolif. 2011, Suppl 1: 60-69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barlow S, Brooke G, Chatterjee K, Price G, Pelekanos R, Rossetti T, Doody M, Venter D, Pain S, Gilshenan K, Atkinson K: Comparison of human placenta- and bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2008, 17: 1095-1107. 10.1089/scd.2007.0154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parolini O, Alviano F, Bagnara GP, Bilic G, Buhring HJ, Evangelista M, Hennerbichler S, Liu B, Magatti M, Mao N, Miki T, Marongiu F, Nakajima H, Nikaido T, Portmann-Lanz CB, Sankar V, Soncini M, Stadler G, Surbek D, Takahashi TA, Redl H, Sakuragawa N, Wolbank S, Zeisberger S, Zisch A, Strom SC: Concise review: isolation and characterization of cells from human term placenta: outcome of the first international Workshop on Placenta Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2008, 26: 300-311. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wulf GG, Viereck V, Hemmerlein B, Haase D, Vehmeyer K, Pukrop T, Glass B, Emons G, Trumper L: Mesengenic progenitor cells derived from human placenta. Tissue Eng. 2004, 10: 1136-1147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Semenov OV, Koestenbauer S, Riegel M, Zech N, Zimmermann R, Zisch AH, Malek A: Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from human placenta: critical parameters for isolation and maintenance of stemness after isolation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 202: 193.e191-193.e113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chien CC, Yen BL, Lee FK, Lai TH, Chen YC, Chan SH, Huang HI: In vitro differentiation of human placenta-derived multipotent cells into hepatocyte-like cells. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 1759-1768. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0521.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee MJ, Jung J, Na KH, Moon JS, Lee HJ, Kim JH, Kim GI, Kwon SW, Hwang SG, Kim GJ: Anti-fibrotic effect of chorionic plate-derived mesenchymal stem cells isolated from human placenta in a rat model of CCl(4)-injured liver: potential application to the treatment of hepatic diseases. J Cell Biochem. 2010, 111: 1453-1463. 10.1002/jcb.22873.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li LJ, Du WB, Zhang YM, Li J, Pan XP, Chen JJ, Cao HC, Chen Y, Chen YM: Evaluation of a bioartificial liver based on a nonwoven fabric bioreactor with porcine hepatocytes in pigs. J Hepatol. 2006, 44: 317-324. 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horwitz EM, Le Blanc K, Dominici M, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, Deans RJ, Krause DS, Keating A: Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2005, 7: 393-395. 10.1080/14653240500319234.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang CJ, Yen ML, Chen YC, Chien CC, Huang HI, Bai CH, Yen BL: Placenta-derived multipotent cells exhibit immunosuppressive properties that are enhanced in the presence of interferon-gamma. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 2466-2477. 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bailo M, Soncini M, Vertua E, Signoroni PB, Sanzone S, Lombardi G, Arienti D, Calamani F, Zatti D, Paul P, Albertini A, Zorzi F, Cavagnini A, Candotti F, Wengler GS, Parolini O: Engraftment potential of human amnion and chorion cells derived from term placenta. Transplantation. 2004, 78: 1439-1448. 10.1097/01.TP.0000144606.84234.49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hay DC, Zhao D, Fletcher J, Hewitt ZA, McLean D, Urruticoechea-Uriguen A, Black JR, Elcombe C, Ross JA, Wolf R, Cui W: Efficient differentiation of hepatocytes from human embryonic stem cells exhibiting markers recapitulating liver development in vivo. Stem Cells. 2008, 26: 894-902. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0718.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang D, Jiang M, Miao D: Transplanted human amniotic membrane-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate carbon tetrachloride-induced liver cirrhosis in mouse. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e16789-10.1371/journal.pone.0016789.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanazawa H, Fujimoto Y, Teratani T, Iwasaki J, Kasahara N, Negishi K, Tsuruyama T, Uemoto S, Kobayashi E: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury in a rat model. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19195-10.1371/journal.pone.0019195.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rabani V, Shahsavani M, Gharavi M, Piryaei A, Azhdari Z, Baharvand H: Mesenchymal stem cell infusion therapy in a carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis model affects matrix metalloproteinase expression. Cell Biol Int. 2010, 34: 601-605. 10.1042/CBI20090386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakaida I, Terai S, Yamamoto N, Aoyama K, Ishikawa T, Nishina H, Okita K: Transplantation of bone marrow cells reduces CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in mice. Hepatology. 2004, 40: 1304-1311. 10.1002/hep.20452.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oyagi S, Hirose M, Kojima M, Okuyama M, Kawase M, Nakamura T, Ohgushi H, Yagi K: Therapeutic effect of transplanting HGF-treated bone marrow mesenchymal cells into CCl4-injured rats. J Hepatol. 2006, 44: 742-748. 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ying QL, Nichols J, Evans EP, Smith AG: Changing potency by spontaneous fusion. Nature. 2002, 416: 545-548. 10.1038/nature729.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piscaglia AC, Novi M, Campanale M, Gasbarrini A: Stem cell-based therapy in gastroenterology and hepatology. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008, 17: 100-118. 10.1080/13645700801969980.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vassilopoulos G, Wang PR, Russell DW: Transplanted bone marrow regenerates liver by cell fusion. Nature. 2003, 422: 901-904. 10.1038/nature01539.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Misawa R, Ise H, Takahashi M, Morimoto H, Kobayashi E, Miyagawa S, Ikeda U: Development of liver regenerative therapy using glycoside-modified bone marrow cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 342: 434-440. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.169.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muraca M, Ferraresso C, Vilei MT, Granato A, Quarta M, Cozzi E, Rugge M, Pauwelyn KA, Caruso M, Avital I, Inderbitzin D, Demetriou AA, Forbes SJ, Realdi G: Liver repopulation with bone marrow derived cells improves the metabolic disorder in the Gunn rat. Gut. 2007, 56: 1725-1735. 10.1136/gut.2007.127969.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuo TK, Hung SP, Chuang CH, Chen CT, Shih YR, Fang SC, Yang VW, Lee OK: Stem cell therapy for liver disease: parameters governing the success of using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Gastroenterology. 2008, 134: 2111-2121. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.015. 2121.e1-3PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa S, Miyagawa S: Potentials of regenerative medicine for liver disease. Surg Today. 2009, 39: 1019-1025. 10.1007/s00595-009-4056-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malhi H, Irani AN, Gagandeep S, Gupta S: Isolation of human progenitor liver epithelial cells with extensive replication capacity and differentiation into mature hepatocytes. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115: 2679-2688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haynesworth SE, Baber MA, Caplan AI: Cytokine expression by human marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells in vitro: effects of dexamethasone and IL-1 alpha. J Cell Physiol. 1996, 166: 585-592. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199603)166:3<585::AID-JCP13>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caplan AI, Dennis JE: Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem. 2006, 98: 1076-1084. 10.1002/jcb.20886.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gnecchi M, He H, Noiseux N, Liang OD, Zhang L, Morello F, Mu H, Melo LG, Pratt RE, Ingwall JS, Dzau VJ: Evidence supporting paracrine hypothesis for Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cell-mediated cardiac protection and functional improvement. FASEB J. 2006, 20: 661-669. 10.1096/fj.05-5211com.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Le Blanc K: Mesenchymal stromal cells: Tissue repair and immune modulation. Cytotherapy. 2006, 8: 559-561. 10.1080/14653240601045399.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu G, Zhang L, Ren G, Yuan Z, Zhang Y, Zhao RC, Shi Y: Immunosuppressive properties of cloned bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Res. 2007, 17: 240-248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheng H, Wang Y, Jin Y, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Wang L, Shen B, Yin S, Liu W, Cui L, Li N: A critical role of IFNgamma in priming MSC-mediated suppression of T cell proliferation through up-regulation of B7-H1. Cell Res. 2008, 18: 846-857. 10.1038/cr.2008.80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nasef A, Mazurier C, Bouchet S, Francois S, Chapel A, Thierry D, Gorin NC, Fouillard L: Leukemia inhibitory factor: Role in human mesenchymal stem cells mediated immunosuppression. Cell Immunol. 2008, 253: 16-22. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2008.06.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Casiraghi F, Azzollini N, Cassis P, Imberti B, Morigi M, Cugini D, Cavinato RA, Todeschini M, Solini S, Sonzogni A, Perico N, Remuzzi G, Noris M: Pretransplant infusion of mesenchymal stem cells prolongs the survival of a semiallogeneic heart transplant through the generation of regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2008, 181: 3933-3946.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chabannes D, Hill M, Merieau E, Rossignol J, Brion R, Soulillou JP, Anegon I, Cuturi MC: A role for heme oxygenase-1 in the immunosuppressive effect of adult rat and human mesenchymal stem cells. Blood. 2007, 110: 3691-3694. 10.1182/blood-2007-02-075481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Popp FC, Eggenhofer E, Renner P, Slowik P, Lang SA, Kaspar H, Geissler EK, Piso P, Schlitt HJ, Dahlke MH: Mesenchymal stem cells can induce long-term acceptance of solid organ allografts in synergy with low-dose mycophenolate. Transpl Immunol. 2008, 20: 55-60. 10.1016/j.trim.2008.08.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sbano P, Cuccia A, Mazzanti B, Urbani S, Giusti B, Lapini I, Rossi L, Abbate R, Marseglia G, Nannetti G, Torricelli F, Miracco C, Bosi A, Fimiani M, Saccardi R: Use of donor bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of skin allograft rejection in a preclinical rat model. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008, 300: 115-124. 10.1007/s00403-007-0827-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbash IM, Chouraqui P, Baron J, Feinberg MS, Etzion S, Tessone A, Miller L, Guetta E, Zipori D, Kedes LH, Kloner RA, Leor J: Systemic delivery of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to the infarcted myocardium: feasibility, cell migration, and body distribution. Circulation. 2003, 108: 863-868. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000084828.50310.6A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobsen PF, Daly J: A method for distinguishing human and mouse cells in solid tumors using in situ hybridization. Exp Mol Pathol. 1994, 61: 212-220. 10.1006/exmp.1994.1038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nicklas JA, Buel E: Development of an Alu-based, real-time PCR method for quantitation of human DNA in forensic samples. J Forensic Sci. 2003, 48: 936-944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/56/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.