Systematic review and meta-analysis of the value of initial biomarkers in predicting adverse outcome in febrile neutropenic episodes in children and young people with cancer
© Phillips et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 December 2011
Accepted: 18 January 2012
Published: 18 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Bob Phillips|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Bob Phillips|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|13 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Bob Phillips|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|15 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|18 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-10-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.