The role of copeptin as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for risk stratification in the emergency department
© Nickel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 2 September 2011
Accepted: 20 January 2012
Published: 20 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jens P. Goetze|
|28 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Esther Meijer|
|3 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pierre Hausfater|
|7 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jolanta Malyszko|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Alice Holt|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Esther Meijer|
|16 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Alice Holt|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|16 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|20 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|20 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-10-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.