Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Genetic, environmental and stochastic factors in monozygotic twin discordance with a focus on epigenetic differences

  • Witold Czyz1, 2,
  • Julia M Morahan1, 2,
  • George C Ebers1, 2 and
  • Sreeram V Ramagopalan1, 2, 3, 4Email author
BMC Medicine201210:93

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-93

Received: 1 May 2012

Accepted: 17 August 2012

Published: 17 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
17 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
17 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-10-93

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Clinical Neurology), University of Oxford
Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine