Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

How well do clinical prediction rules perform in identifying serious infections in acutely ill children across an international network of ambulatory care datasets?

  • Jan Y Verbakel1Email author,
  • Ann Van den Bruel2,
  • Matthew Thompson2,
  • Richard Stevens2,
  • Bert Aertgeerts1,
  • Rianne Oostenbrink3,
  • Henriette A Moll3,
  • Marjolein Y Berger4,
  • Monica Lakhanpaul5,
  • David Mant2,
  • Frank Buntinx1, 6 and
  • the European Research Network on Recognising Serious Infection (ERNIE)
BMC Medicine201311:10

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-10

Received: 26 July 2012

Accepted: 15 January 2013

Published: 15 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fernando Ferrero
10 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Wyer
17 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nader Shaikh
15 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fernando Ferrero
25 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nader Shaikh
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Wyer
14 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 8
14 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 8
23 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 9
23 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 9
23 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 10
23 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
15 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-11-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Practice, KU Leuven
(2)
Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House
(3)
Erasmus MC - Sophia's Children Hospital
(4)
Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen
(5)
Department of General and Adolescent Paediatrics, University College London, Institute of Child Health
(6)
Research Institute Caphri, Maastricht University

Advertisement