Integrating sepsis management recommendations into clinical care guidelines for district hospitals in resource-limited settings: the necessity to augment new guidelines with future research
© Jacob et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 16 January 2013
Accepted: 18 March 2013
Published: 18 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Myburgh|
|5 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathryn Maitland|
|27 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Shevin Jacob|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Shevin Jacob|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|16 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|18 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|18 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-107|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.