Targeted rotavirus vaccination of high-risk infants; a low cost and highly cost-effective alternative to universal vaccination
© Bruijning-Verhagen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 5 October 2012
Accepted: 9 April 2013
Published: 26 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Gasparini|
|25 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giovanni Giammanco|
|6 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Osamu Nakagomi|
|30 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - gary ginsberg|
|4 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cara Usher|
|27 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Patricia Bruijning-Verhagen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - gary ginsberg|
|27 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Gasparini|
|28 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Patricia Bruijning-Verhagen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|26 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-112|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.