Collectives of diagnostic biomarkers identify high-risk subpopulations of hematuria patients: exploiting heterogeneity in large-scale biomarker data
© Emmert-Streib et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 June 2012
Accepted: 17 January 2013
Published: 17 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Fitzpatrick|
|23 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kate Williamson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Fitzpatrick|
|18 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers|
|18 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kate Williamson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|18 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kate Williamson|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|9 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|17 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.