Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC
© Cuthbert and Insel; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 October 2012
Accepted: 13 March 2013
Published: 14 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rajiv Tandon|
|20 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carlo Faravelli|
|17 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Assen Jablensky|
|10 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Alice Holt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Alice Holt|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|14 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-126|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.