Comparative assessment of absolute cardiovascular disease risk characterization from non-laboratory-based risk assessment in South African populations
© Gaziano et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 1 December 2012
Accepted: 27 June 2013
Published: 24 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giampaoli Simona|
|6 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Woodiwiss|
|22 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Gaziano|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Woodiwiss|
|31 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Gaziano|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|31 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|24 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Gaziano|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|24 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|27 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-170|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.