Peripheral blood monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio at study enrollment predicts efficacy of the RTS,S malaria vaccine: analysis of pooled phase II clinical trial data
© Warimwe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 May 2013
Accepted: 26 July 2013
Published: 21 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 May 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - George Warimwe|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giampietro Corradin|
|8 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Denise Doolan|
|23 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - George Warimwe|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Denise Doolan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|21 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-184|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.