Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A novel serogenetic approach determines the community prevalence of celiac disease and informs improved diagnostic pathways

  • Robert P Anderson1, 2, 3, 4Email author,
  • Margaret J Henry5,
  • Roberta Taylor6,
  • Emma L Duncan7, 8,
  • Patrick Danoy7, 12,
  • Marylia J Costa1, 2,
  • Kathryn Addison7,
  • Jason A Tye-Din1, 2, 3,
  • Mark A Kotowicz5, 9,
  • Ross E Knight10,
  • Wendy Pollock6,
  • Geoffrey C Nicholson8, 11,
  • Ban-Hock Toh6,
  • Matthew A Brown7 and
  • Julie A Pasco5, 9
BMC Medicine201311:188

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-188

Received: 8 May 2013

Accepted: 2 August 2013

Published: 28 August 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 May 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Umberto Volta
8 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Derek Jewell
12 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Robert Anderson
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Robert Anderson
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Robert Anderson
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Aug 2013 Editorially accepted
28 Aug 2013 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-11-188

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
1G Royal Parade, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
(2)
Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne
(3)
Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health
(4)
ImmusanT, Inc., ImmusanT Inc.
(5)
School of Medicine, Deakin University
(6)
Healthscope Pathology
(7)
Human Genetics Group, University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute
(8)
Endocrinology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital
(9)
NorthWest Academic Centre, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
(10)
Geelong Gastroenterology
(11)
Rural Clinical School, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland
(12)
Roche Diagnostics Australia

Advertisement