Patients with osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis have better functional outcomes and those with avascular necrosis worse pain outcomes compared to rheumatoid arthritis after primary hip arthroplasty: a cohort study
© Singh and Lewallen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 June 2013
Accepted: 30 August 2013
Published: 24 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hassan Ghomrawi|
|1 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jack Williams|
|4 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jasvinder Singh|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jasvinder Singh|
|27 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hassan Ghomrawi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|24 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-210|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.