Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Irisin and exercise training in humans – Results from a randomized controlled training trial

  • Anne Hecksteden1Email author,
  • Melissa Wegmann1,
  • Anke Steffen1,
  • Jochen Kraushaar1,
  • Arne Morsch2,
  • Sandra Ruppenthal3,
  • Lars Kaestner3 and
  • Tim Meyer1
BMC Medicine201311:235

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-235

Received: 9 July 2013

Accepted: 3 October 2013

Published: 5 November 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
9 Jul 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Timmons
22 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henrik Galbo
11 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Anne Hecksteden
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henrik Galbo
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Oct 2013 Editorially accepted
5 Nov 2013 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-11-235

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, Saarland University
Deutsche Hochschule für Prävention und Gesundheitsmanagement
Institute for Molecular Cell Biology, Saarland University