Diagnostic indicators of non-cardiovascular chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
© Wertli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 18 June 2013
Accepted: 15 October 2013
Published: 8 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Erik Otterstad|
|10 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pascal Meier|
|18 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jos Kleijnen|
|4 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Maria M. Wertli|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Erik Otterstad|
|1 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pascal Meier|
|7 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jos Kleijnen|
|9 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Maria M. Wertli|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|8 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-239|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.