Construct-level predictive validity of educational attainment and intellectual aptitude tests in medical student selection: meta-regression of six UK longitudinal studies
© McManus et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 26 June 2013
Accepted: 10 September 2013
Published: 14 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sam Leinster|
|8 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Zhang|
|26 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Trudie Roberts|
|30 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ed Peile|
|8 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Chris McManus|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Chris McManus|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|14 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-243|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.