Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Allergen immunotherapy and allergic rhinitis: false beliefs

  • Moisés A Calderón1Email author,
  • A William Frankland2 and
  • Pascal Demoly3
BMC Medicine201311:255

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-255

Received: 8 August 2013

Accepted: 16 September 2013

Published: 5 December 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Aug 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wayne Thomas
21 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Blaiss
28 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hugo Van Bever
3 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Moises A. Calderon
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
5 Dec 2013 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-11-255

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London - National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital
London Allergy Clinic
Allergy Division, Pneumology Department, INSERM U657-University Hospital of Montpellier, Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud