Open Access

Clinical development of monoclonal antibody-based drugs in HIV and HCV diseases

  • Michela Flego1Email author,
  • Alessandro Ascione1,
  • Maurizio Cianfriglia1 and
  • Stefano Vella1
Contributed equally
BMC Medicine201311:4

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-4

Received: 21 June 2012

Accepted: 4 January 2013

Published: 4 January 2013


Today there are many licensed antiviral drugs, but the emergence of drug resistant strains sometimes invalidates the effects of the current therapies used in the treatment of infectious diseases. Compared to conventional antiviral drugs, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used as pharmacological molecules have particular physical characteristics and modes of action, and, therefore, they should be considered as a distinct therapeutic class. Despite being historically validated, antibodies may represent a novel tool for combatting infectious diseases. The current high cost of mAbs' production, storage and administration (by injection only) and the consequent obstacles to development are outweighed by mAbs' clinical advantages. These are related to a low toxicity combined with high specificity and versatility, which allows a specific antibody to mediate various biological effects, ranging from the virus neutralization mechanisms to the modulation of immune responses.

This review briefly summarizes the recent technological advances in the field of immunoglobulin research, and the current status of mAb-based drugs in clinical trials for HIV and HCV diseases. For each clinical trial the available data are reported and the emerging conceptual problems of the employed mAbs are highlighted.

This overview helps to give a clear picture of the efficacy and challenges of the mAbs in the field of these two infectious diseases which have such a global impact.


monoclonal antibodies mAb-mediated antiviral mechanisms anti-infectious biological agents antiviral mAb based therapy anti-HIV drugs anti-HCV drugs clinical studies


The innate immune response is the first-line defense in determining the outcome of an infection. Infectious agents contain conserved motifs on their surface that react with conserved pattern recognition Toll-like receptors of the host. This interaction initiates a powerful innate immune response. Moreover, the infectious agent's surface proteins and carbohydrates come into contact with B-cell receptors, membrane-bound immunoglobulin of isotype M (IgM) or D (IgD), and often induce potent antibody responses, which take some weeks to fully develop [1].

When a vertebrate organism encounters a pathogen, such as a virus or bacteria, it generates a polyclonal antibody response against numerous epitopes on different antigens during infection; therefore, polyclonal serum contains a large and diverse population of antibodies, which also include neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). Thus, polyclonal serum-derived biotherapeutic products can contain various nAbs against multiple and distinct epitopes; these nAbs provide strong protective activity due to additive or even synergistic effects on neutralization. However, in this type of product the vast majority of their constituent specific antibodies are non-neutralizing, since they are directed against misfolded protein or against epitopes on native surface proteins for which antibody binding is not protective [2, 3]. Furthermore, for some viral and bacterial infections, no correlates of protection have been established; therefore, the significance of antibody titers, apart from indicating past exposure, is not clear.

Mechanisms of immunological escape can explain why total antibody titers are not always protective. Many infectious organisms, including viruses, can constantly mutate surface proteins and exploit glycans to shield important epitopes, diverting the antibody response away from functionally important epitopes in favor of immunogenic irrelevant epitopes [4].

Thanks to their protective properties, the administration of hyperimmune sera from immunized animals or immune human donors, named 'serum therapy', was the first effective treatment of infectious diseases. Later, the advent of antibiotic therapy with the advances in vaccine design has meant that serum therapy was almost abandoned for many infectious diseases. Nevertheless, hyperimmune human sera immunoglobulin preparations are still used to treat different bacterial toxins and virus related diseases, including those caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), rabies, vaccinia, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and measles, underscoring the fact that antibody therapy remains an effective means of treatment [5, 6].

Today, the ability to rapidly generate and manipulate antibodies with a defined epitope recognition, named "monoclonal antibodies" (mAbs) (Figure 1), has opened a new window of opportunity for a rematch of antibodies in clinical practice. This achievement has been possible thanks to advances in cellular biology and biotechnology (Figure 2), and also to improved purification techniques which have made these therapeutics safer, less immunogenic and more effective. MAb preparations have many advantages over immune sera-derived preparations which can vary due to both time and the source of origin, since different hosts mount different antibody responses. One advantage is that mAbs, by virtue of the fact that they are chemically defined reagents, exhibit relatively low lot-to-lot variability and low risk of pathogen transmission. Another advantage for mAb preparations is the much greater activity per mass of protein since all the Ig molecules are specific for the desired target. This phenomenon is illustrated by the report that two 0.7 mg doses of two mAbs provided the same protection against tetanus toxin as 100 to 170 mg of tetanus immunoglobulins [7]. Neither does mAb therapy have the immunological complications associated with the use of heterologous sera in humans, such as serum sickness and immediate hypersensitivity, which significantly limited the latter's usefulness [8].
Figure 1

Schematic structure of a mAb. All immunoglobulins are composed of two identical light (L) chains and two identical heavy (H) chains, linked by disulphide bonds (black dashed bars). The heavy chains contain one variable domain (VH) and three or four constant domains (CH1, CH2, CH3 and CH4) depending on antibody isotype. By contrast, the light chains contain only one variable domain (VL) and a single constant domain (CL). Within the Fab region, at the end of the two arms of the Y-shaped molecule, the variable domain of a heavy chain pairs with the light chain variable domain to form the antigen-binding site. In more detail, within the matched V regions, three short polypeptide segments on the heavy chain and three on the light chain form the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), which dictate the precise antigen-binding characteristics of the antibody. On the other end, the Fc domain, which includes the sites for interaction with the complement system and Fc receptors, mediates effector functions determining the fate of the bound antigen.
Figure 2

Evolution of mAbs linked to the need to decrease their immunogenicity. Different methods to obtain mAbs are depicted. Mouse mAbs, the 'hybridoma' cells derived from the stable fusion of immortalized mouse myeloma cells with lymphocytes from immunized mice, are screened to identify individual clones producing identical antibody to a single antigenic determinant [118]. Chimeric mAbs, the murine constant regions of both heavy and light antibody chains (mCH and mCL), are replaced with human counterparts (hCH1, hCH2, hCH3 and hCL1), leaving intact the murine variable portions (mVH and mVL) [119]. Humanized mAbs, only the CDRs of the murine mAbs (mCDRs) from both the mVH and the mVL, are 'grafted' into a human backbone antibody [120, 121]. Human mAbs, 1)Human memory B-cells isolated from patients are immortalized by Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide, and then screened for specific antibody production [122]. 2) Transgenic mice, obtained by a genetic replacement of the mouse immunoglobulin genes with human counterparts, are used to obtain fully human mAbs by traditional hybridoma technology [123]. 3) Antibody libraries, constructed by in vitro combinatorial assembly of human immunoglobulin variable-region gene (V genes) and cloned to provide the display onto phage surfaces, are subjected to a panning against an antigen in order to select specific clones [124]. The first mAbs of each category approved for clinical use are shown. Palivizumab is the first and, so far, only mAb approved for infectious diseases. The endings used to name the different types of mAbs are also indicated.

In recent years, mAbs have emerged as a new class of biological drugs in oncology as well as in immune and inflammatory diseases, albeit their development in infectious diseases has been slower. To date, the only mAb approved in this field is palivizumab, an anti-RSV mAb licensed for prevention of severe respiratory disease in high-risk infants and immunocompromised adults. Now the scenario is gradually changing and there are many antibodies against viruses and bacteria in various stages of clinical development. This trend has also been influenced by the development of different scientific disciplines, which makes it possible to study and dissect the function of individual microbial structures supporting the development of more targeted drugs. There are excellent reviews about this topic [6, 9].

In this review we focus on the mAb-therapies now underway in clinical trials (Table 1) designed for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infectious diseases. Both these worldwide epidemics require new strategies due to the lack of a definitive cure and effective vaccines, to the continuous emergence of drug resistant variants, to the toxicities of licensed drugs and to the need to ensure a treatment for all patients. In this context, antibodies represent an intriguing alternative as therapeutics; in their favor are their different resistance mechanisms and a more favorable toxicity profile when compared to other available drug classes, fitting them for use in conjunction with the current chemotherapy by slowing the onset of resistance and possibly enhancing therapeutic efficacy.
Table 1

Anti-HIV and HCV mAbs in clinical development.






MAbs against viral antigens

3 mAb cocktail

C2F5, C2G12, and C4E10

Anti-Gp41, anti-glycan structure of Gp120

Human mAb

Rockefeller University

Therapy of HIV infection Phase I/II


Anti-glycan structure of Gp120

Human mAb

University of Surrey

European Commission

Prevention of HIV infection Phase I


Anti-V3 loop of HIV-1 Env

Humanized mAb

The Chemo-Sero-Therapeutic Research Institute

Therapy of HIV infection Phase I


Anti-Gp120, CD4 binding site

Human mAb

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Therapy of HIV infection Phase I



Human mAb


Prevention of liver reinfection with HCV after transplantation Phase II

MAbs against host antigens


Anti-CD4 receptor

Humanized mAb

TaiMed Biologics/Tanox

Therapy of HIV infection Phase I/II


Anti-CCR5 receptor

Humanized mAb


Therapy of HIV infection Phase I/II


Anti-CCR5 receptor

Human mAb

Human Genome Sciences

Therapy of HIV infection Phase I


Anti-phosphatidyl serine.

Chimeric mAb

Peregrine Pharmaceuticals

Therapy of HIV/HCV co-infection Phase II

Therapy of chronic HCV infection co-administrated with ribavirin Phase II

Immunomodulatory mAbs


CP 675,206


Humanized mAb


Therapy of HIV infection Phase I (study withdrawn prior to enrollment)

Therapy of advanced HCC in HCV infected patient Phase II



Humanized mAb


Therapy of chronic HCV infection Phase I/II

BMS 936558



Human mAb

Bristol-Myers Squibb/Medarex

Therapy of chronic HCV infection Phase I

MAbs-mediated clearance of viruses and infected cells

The antibody structure comprises a pair of identical heavy and light chains linked by disulphide bonds held in a Y-shaped arrangement (Figure 1). The fragment antigen-binding (Fab) portion, the region that binds the antigen, is composed of one variable and one constant domain of both the heavy and the light chain. The remaining constant sections of the longer heavy chains form the tail of the Y, termed the crystallizable fragment (Fc) region, which provides the signal for effector functions.

Antibodies can provide protective effects through various mechanisms [10]. Viral neutralization is generally meant as the ability of an antibody to provide sufficient steric interference to disrupt the interaction between a microbic antigen and its ligand in experimental conditions in vitro. This activity is clearly associated with protection, thanks to their Fab domain alone, both in natural infection and after immunization. Virus infection includes sequential steps beginning with attachment to cell-surface receptors and ending with delivery of the viral genetic material into the cytoplasm [11]. Fusion of viral and cellular membranes is a basic entry mode for enveloped viruses, such as HIV and HCV [12], which still differ in specific aspects of viral entry and assembly, thus offering unique therapeutic opportunities. The cell surface is certainly more directly accessible for the action of the antibodies; therefore, the phase of virus entry is one of the most important targets in preventing viral infection at the origin, and many known nAbs act at this step. For the same reason, inhibition of the release of progeny virus is another possible mechanism of neutralization, as demonstrated by antibodies directed against influenza A virion surface neuraminidase [13]. In HIV and HCV fields, no virus release inhibiting antibodies have been identified to date.

The interaction of HIV envelope surface protein gp120 with its host receptor, CD4, on human T cells triggers conformational changes in the envelope, resulting in exposure of a transient binding site for co-receptor CCR5 or CXCR4. This in turn promotes additional conformational changes in virus gp41 protein which allow it to insert its fusion peptide into the target cell membrane to initiate membrane fusion and viral entry into host cells. NAbs can inhibit viral infection by several different mechanisms in parallel with the steps that allow the viruses to enter into cells (Figure 3). They can directly block virus attachment to target cells by interfering with virus-receptor interactions, as in the case of nAbs against the CD4-binding site on HIV gp120 [14]. This same goal can also be achieved by directing the antibodies to the virus receptor and/or co-receptor on host cells. MAbs can also block fusion at the cell membrane at the post-binding/pre-fusion stage, as exemplified by anti-CD4 [15] and/or anti-CCR5/CXCR4 (CC-motif receptor 5/CXC-motif receptor 4) mAbs, under development [16]. Again, mAbs directed to the external proximal membrane region of HIV gp41 can interfere with conformational changes needed for membrane fusion [17].
Figure 3

Possible mechanisms of action of the mAbs with antiviral properties. Panel A shows a hypothetical viral life cycle, highlighting potential points for therapeutic antiviral mAbs. Antibodies can block receptor engagement by binding to specific virus surface proteins (1), as well as by binding to the viral receptor or co-receptor on host cell surface (2). Some antibodies, can neutralize viral infection through interfering with conformational changes required for membrane fusion and subsequent release of the viral core into the target-cell cytoplasm; this post-binding neutralization may occur at the cell surface (3), or inside the endosomes for the viruses (for example, HCV) whose entry into the cell requires an endocytosis step (4). Antibodies recognizing viral or host proteins expressed on infected cell surface can exert protective actions through the Fc-mediated effector functions (for example, CDC, ADCC) (5). Again, mAbs may prevent the release of progeny virions (6). At the bottom the antibody neutralizing effects on the viruses before cell binding, including the direct virolysis by CDC and the mAb-mediated enhanced phagocitosis, are shown (7). In Panel B, the possible mAb-mediated immunomodulary therapies are depicted. In some chronic viral infections, virus-specific immune cells may persist in a 'non-functional' state, because of an imbalance of immunoregulatory signals involving multiple inhibitory and activating receptors, triggered by soluble factors and/or cell surface ligands. Therapeutic approaches using specific mAbs to block host immunosuppressive molecules (antagonism) or to trigger activating receptors (agonism) may be a valid strategy to restore immune cell function and treat various chronic viral infections.

Unlike HIV, HCV entry into target cells occurs via clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the viral particle [18]. Subsequent release of the viral genome into the cytosol requires the pH-dependent fusion of viral and cellular membranes. Current models suggest that HCV circulate as LipoViral-Particles (LVPs) in the vascular system, these consisting of lipoproteins in complex with virus particles. Following localization to the surface of hepatocytes through interactions of LVPs with glycosaminoglycans and the low density lipoprotein receptor, specific binding of the E1 and E2 virus surface glycoproteins with the host SR-B1 scavenger receptor and CD81 occur [19]. Subsequently, viral particles are translocated to regions of the membrane possessing tight junction proteins occludin and claudins; the binding to these receptors results in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. As for HIV, mAbs directed against spike viral proteins, as well as against host receptors, may act at an early stage of infection by preventing the binding of the virus on the cell surface. For example, antibodies recognizing the CD81-binding site within the envelope glycoprotein E2 have been shown to block viral entry, as have a number of anti-receptor antibodies targeting CD81 [20, 21] and SR-BI [22]. Some antibodies may act by blocking conformational changes and/or the requisite interactions between the viral and endosomal membranes required for fusion; although as yet no fusion determinant within the envelope glycoproteins has been defined.

Host protection in vivo is more complex and involves the interaction of antibodies with cells and molecules of the innate immune system. The antibody can exert protective actions through an Fc region-mediated recruitment of other components of the immune system, including antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis. Receptors for the Fc segment of IgG (Fcy receptors; FcγRs) are expressed on the surface of different types of cells, including natural killer cells (NK), monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells and neutrophils. With the exception of γδT cells, FcγRs are not normally found on T lymphocytes. Similarly, the receptor for Fc segment of IgA, the FcαR, involved in phagocytosis and induction of microbe killing, is expressed on monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils [23].

The ADCC process is triggered by the interaction between the Fc region of an antibody bound to a non-self antigen exposed on host cells, and the Fc receptors on immune effector cells. The subsequent release of cytokines and cytotoxic granules containing perforins and granzymes promotes the death of the target cell. CDC is initiated by complement component C1q binding to the Fc region of IgG, which is in turn bound to the foreign antigen on the cell surface. This triggers a proteolytic cascade to activate the complement, so leading to the formation of a membrane attack complex that kills the target cell by disrupting its cell membrane. The Fc region can also mediate complement binding to and deposition on free virions, which can cause a direct virotoxic effect or inhibit virus binding to cells. Moreover, the so-called opsonization process, consisting of the binding of antibody Fab portion to the antigen following by the interaction of Fc domain to an Fc receptor on phagocytes, is a powerful mechanism to enhance the phagocytosis [9].

With respect to HIV, a potential role for ADCC in modulating the course of HIV infection was first proposed on the basis of studies showing an inverse association between ADCC antibody levels and the clinical stage of disease. The strongest evidence for a role for ADCC antibody in disease progression comes from a study by Baum et al. of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study [24]. In that study, rapid progressors had significantly lower ADCC antibody titers against CEM. NKR cells coated with gp120 than did non-rapid progressors at corresponding visits or non-progressors at any visit. Morever, HIV-infected individuals with spontaneously undetectable viremia were shown to have higher ADCC antibody levels than viremic subjects [25].

In the context of HCV infection, Fc-mediated effector functions, although less well understood, can still have an important role. Sera from both the acute and chronic phase of infection can mediate ADCC via binding to viral protein E2 expressed at the cell surface [26], while several E2-specific mAbs are able to induce CDC of E2-expressing cells [27]. Optimizing non-nAb effector functions, such as ADCC, CDC and fagogocytosis, may prove critical in the design of new effective anti-HCV therapeutic antibodies [28].

Modulation of immune response by mAbs in order to overcome exhaustion in chronic viral infections

Many viruses, including HIV and HCV, have developed mechanisms for evasion and/or modification of the host's innate and adaptive immune response, often causing persistent viral infection. One of the most extensively investigated examples of evasion of the host's adaptive immune system is the exhaustion of virus-specific T cells. Exhaustion consists of a progressive dysfunction characterized by the inability to proliferate and to produce key antiviral and immune stimulating cytokines (for example, interleukin (IL)-2, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, interferon (IFN)-γ), or to lyse infected cells [29].

A feature of functional exhaustion is that it affects many antiviral properties of both mouse and human CD8+ T cells. Loss of effector functions proceeds in a hierarchical manner starting with defects in IL-2 production and proliferation, followed by the decrease of TNF production. Cytotoxic activity is also lacking in exhausted human CD8+ T cells. At a severe stage of exhaustion, IFN-γ production is eventually compromised, with exhausted T cells ending up deleted if the high antigenic load persists [30]. Exhaustion can also occur in CD4+ T cells in both mice [31] and humans [32]. Probably the best explanation for this progressive dysfunction and loss of effector T cells is the continuous triggering of virus-specific T cell receptors owing to a high antigenic load in persistently infected hosts without a critical rest period. The current consensus is that functional exhaustion is a way of limiting the magnitude of effector T cell responses. Although this may safeguard against autoimmune responses, it may also compromise effective immunity against persistent infectious agents and tumors [29].

Exhausted T cells are subject to complex layers of negative regulation. This involves signaling through multiple inhibitory receptors that inhibit functional and proliferative responses. The CD28 family member programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) has been shown to be the most highly expressed inhibitory receptor on CD8+ T cells during chronic infection, and to have a major role in regulating T cell exhaustion during infection [33, 34]. Increased expression of PD-1 by T cells also occurs during HBV and HCV infections [3537]. Several other inhibitory receptors have also been shown to induce T cell unresponsiveness during chronic infections. These receptors include cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) [31, 38, 39], T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain protein 3 (TIM3) [40, 41], and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) [38]. In addition, certain cytokines, such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) as well as regulatory T cells, may also contribute to the lack of T cell functionality during situations of high antigenic burden [42].

There is intriguing evidence that blockade of the inhibitory receptor could restore antigen T cell responses. For example, blockade of the PD-1 signaling pathway improves antigen-specific T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV)-infected mice [31, 34] and in humans with chronic HIV [32, 43, 44], HBV [45] and HCV [36] infections. This effect was synergistically improved in LCMV infected mouse following the simultaneous blockade of the T cell inhibitory receptors PD-1 and LAG-3, thanks to which a diminished viral load in vivo was observed, although blocking LAG-3 pathway alone had little effect on the severity of exhaustion [34]. Moreover, mAb-mediated blocking of CTLA-4 pathway in vitro augments HIV-specific CD4+ T-cell function suggesting that the immune modulation of this target may also provide a clinical benefit in infected individuals [39]. Another example is the manipulation of signals mediated by glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor (GITR), a recently identified member of the TNF receptor superfamily, preferentially expressed on subset CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. GITR signals break the suppressive activity of this subset. In fact, an agonistic anti-GITR mAb immediately injected after viral infection significantly increased the number of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells secreting IFN-γ [46].

One must remember that the manipulation of immunological responses could have detrimental effects on the host, as highlighted by the recent tragic human trial of TGN1412. This is a mAb against human T cell co-stimulatory molecule CD28 developed by TeGenero to treat B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, on the basis of its capability of inducing preferential activation and expansion of immunosuppressive regulatory T (Treg) cells, as observed in rodent models. TGN1412 has been termed a 'superagonist' because it binds to CD28 and activates T cells without the need for prior T cell antigen receptor (TCR) signaling. In a Phase I clinical trial (in March 2006), following administration of TGN1412, six healthy young men suffered a life-threatening cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) involving multi-organ failure, something unpredicted by the preclinical studies. It is now clear that in the presence of TGN1412, activated CD4+ effector memory T (TEM) cells were the source of the cytokines that mediated the CRS observed in the volunteers. Treg cells were not able to prevent systemic inflammation, probably because the balance between activated Treg cell and TEM cell numbers is disadvantageous for humans compared with laboratory rodents. Furthermore, in macaques, but not in humans, CD4+ T cells lose CD28 expression during their differentiation into TEM cells; this detail, however, had gone unnoticed despite many years of primate testing. In conclusion, this model failed to prevent the disastrous case above [47].

In view of these events, such a risk needs to be carefully assessed if the modulation of immune inhibitory or activating receptors is used for increasing the functional activity of virus-specific T cells in order to avoid non-specific inflammation. These therapeutic approaches are being carefully evaluated for cancer as well as for HIV and HCV chronic viral disease.

Clinical development of anti-HIV and HCV mAbs

MAbs against viral antigens

Given the potential antiviral effect of the antibodies, viruses have evolved multiple mechanisms to protect themselves from antibody binding. One of these, the viral receptor glycosylation, is widely shared among different viruses. Carbohydrates are poorly immunogenic and, therefore, do not stimulate the response of type B lymphocytes and simultaneously hide the underlying protein structures. HCV E2 protein contains up to 11 potential N-linked glycosylation sites. Specific glycans mask the CD81-binding site and, therefore, nAb epitopes [48]. Lipid shielding may represent an additional strategy used by HCV to evade the antibody response. Current data suggest that key neutralizing epitopes are less accessible on LVPs. More recently, HCV has been found capable of direct cell-to-cell transmission, which is largely resistant to antibody neutralization [49, 50]. HIV envelope protein is also glycosilated and changes occur in the frequency and position of glycans HIV gp120; these 'evolving glycan shields' have been shown to decrease sensitivity to antibody neutralization [51]. Other factors of antibody escape for HIV are: trimerization of the gp 120 and gp 41 that can shield vulnerable epitopes better exposed on the individual monomeric subunits; kinetic and spatial constraints that impede antibodies from accessing potentially vulnerable sites during receptor binding and membrane fusion process; the variable loops of gp120 that are a prime target for nAbs, which usually have a very narrow breadth of reactivity [52]. Finally, the high mutation rate of many viruses, including HIV and HCV, which undergo rapid antigenic variation, allows them to escape neutralization, constituting a significant hurdle for nAbs development.

All these problems may be counter-balanced by selecting nAbs which target conserved and more accessible areas of viral particles, and/or by using mixtures of nAbs which target various key epitopes. In fact, it has been demonstrated that combination therapy with mAb cocktails prevents escape variants for many viruses, including influenza [53], coronavirus [54] and LCMV [55], and that broad neutralization in the sera of most of some individual HIV infected donors can be associated with single or four to five principal specificities [56].

Recent studies have indicated that nAbs play a critical role in HCV disease outcome. Viral clearance was associated with a rapid induction of neutralizing antibodies in the early phase of infection with some evidence that these antibodies are broadly reactive [57, 58]. In contrast, chronic HCV infection was characterized by absent or low-titer neutralizing antibodies in the early phase of infection and the persistence of infection, despite the induction of cross-neutralizing antibodies in the later phase of infection. Current understanding of the nAb response raised against HCV suggests that E2 is the major target, and that multiple epitopes within E2 may be targeted by both linear-and conformation-dependent antibodies. Predominantly, these neutralization epitopes overlap with CD81-binding sites and clearly demonstrate a role in inhibition of entry. Currently, one of these mAbs, MBL-HCV1, is being investigated in clinical trials in the prevention of liver re-infection after transplantation, for which novel antiviral preventive and therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. In fact, re-infection of the graft is universal, being characterized by accelerated progression of liver disease; IFN-based therapies exhibit enhanced adverse effects and limited efficacy in these patients [59, 60]. MBL-HCV1 is a fully human monoclonal antibody isolated from transgenic mice and directed to a highly conserved linear epitope of HCV E2 glycoprotein. It is able to neutralize pseudoviruses from multiple HCV genotypes and has demonstrated efficacy in preventing HCV genotype-1 infection in HCV naïve chimpanzees. A phase I open-labeled, dose escalation study was performed in healthy adult volunteers starting with 1 mg/kg and escalating to 3, 10, 30 and 50 mg/kg after a 10-day post-infusion safety review. MBL-HCV1 was well-tolerated without any seriously adverse effect event. Based on the favorable safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics data, a phase II study of MBL-HCV1 in chronically infected HCV patients undergoing liver transplantation has been planned [61].

In the context of HIV disease, despite intensive study over two decades, only a small number of broadly neutralizing mAbs have been identified from infected patients and little is known about their activity in vivo. These antibodies are able to inhibit viral entry of most primary HIV isolates in vitro [17, 6264] and the exceptionally high level of mutation found in their genes may reflect chronic immune responses to HIV and persistent hypermutation and selection [65]. A number of trials evaluating different formulations of anti-HIV monoclonal antibodies are now in progress.

The first trial assessed a chimeric monoclonal antibody CGP 47,439 to the V3 loop of the HIV-1 envelope gp120 over 21 weeks [66, 67]. Subsequent studies evaluated the kinetics of monoclonal antibody F105 directed to the CD4-binding site of gp120 [68, 69], a humanized antibody binding to the V3 epitope GPGRAF [70]. Finally, a humanized mAb, KD-247 is under evaluation in clinical trials. Its epitope was mapped to 6 aa, IGPGRA, at the tip of the V3 loop of Envelope protein and demonstrates cross-neutralizing activity against HIV-1 isolates in clade B [71].

A drug based on the mAb cocktail mode is also currently in clinical development. In this regard it has already been observed that in HIV neutralization assays the effectiveness of a mix of broadly neutralizing antibodies increased synergistically compared to the effect of the individual antibody. The synergy effect was relatively weak, with a maximum of two- to four-fold enhancement, between antibody pairs, thereby increasing neutralization titers about 10-fold in triple and quadruple antibody combinations [72]. However, the use of antibodies in the cocktail mode, as an approach to improve their effectiveness, is already recognized for other pathogens or toxins. In the case of tetanus toxin, it has been reported that combining the action of three out of four antibodies increased the neutralizing activity up to 200 times [73]. In the case of botulinum toxin, neutralizing activity has been reported up to 20,000 times higher when using a mixture of three monoclonal antibodies [74]. Instead, other studies have demonstrated that the combination of two potent neutralizing mAbs against HIV, VRC01 and PG9, although not synergistic, can mediate additive neutralization viral activity and provides an improved neutralization coverage of 90% to 97% of viral strains by combining independent epitope targeting [75].

In a proof-of-concept passive immunization trial with humans, it has been demonstrated that a cocktail of the three broadly neutralizing mAbs - 2G12, 4E10 and 2F5 - was able to delay viral rebound in patients whose infections were fully suppressed by antiretroviral treatment before administration of the antibodies [76]. Interestingly, the main antiviral effect observed was primarily attributable to the 2G12 antibody, a mAb that binds to a non-continuous epitope composed of glycosylation residues distributed over the envelope protein gp120 [64], whereas the other two mAbs, 4E10 [77] and 2F5 [78], recognize two adjacent highly conserved epitopes on the membrane-proximal ectodomain of the HIV-1 envelope protein gp41. In earlier phase I clinical trials, safety and tolerability were demonstrated [79, 80]. During a long-term multiple dose phase II clinical trial, high doses of the three neutralizing antibodies were given in combination to 14 HIV-1-infected individuals at weekly intervals over three months. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that repeated infusions at high dose levels were well tolerated by the patients and did not elicit an endogenous immune response against the monoclonal antibodies. The antibodies showed distribution and elimination kinetics similar to those seen for other human-like antibodies, though monoclonal antibody 2G12 had a significantly longer elimination half-life (21.8 +/- 7.2 days) than monoclonal antibodies 4E10 (5.5 +/- 2.2 days) and 2F5 (4.3 +/- 1.1 days) [81]. Furthermore, analyses of the emergence of mutations conferring resistance to these three mAbs were performed. Sequence analysis of the 2G12 epitope relevant N-glycosylation sites of viruses derived from 13 patients demonstrated that mutations in these sites are associated with resistance. In vitro selection experiments with isolates of four of these individuals corroborated the in vivo finding that virus strains rapidly escape 2G12 pressure. Importantly, in vitro selection with 2F5 and 4E10 demonstrated that resistance to these nAbs can be difficult to achieve and can lead to selection of variants with impaired infectivity [82]. Moreover, generation of viruses resistant to the triple-combination was a slower process characterized by recurrent loss of virus replication; some generated triple-resistant viruses seemed to be impaired in their replicative fitness, and none of the patients developed detectable viruses that escaped neutralization by all three mAbs within the 77-day observation period [83].

As is true with all mAbs designed for infectious disease, the development of a successful vaccine would reduce the need for them. However, given the scarcity of drugs in the field of virology and given the slow progress on the HIV vaccine front, the development and use of microbicides, compounds that could be applied topically to prevent HIV transmission, is one of the possible strategies to counter the spread of HIV. In this regard, mAbs could be proposed as suitable components of microbicides to fight HIV entry at mucosal surface. A safety study of P2G12 mAb administered vaginally in healthy women has been completed. P2G12 is the broadly neutralizing 2G12 mAb manufactured from tobacco plants [84]. Most mAbs in clinical trials have been produced using a system called Chinese Hamster Ovary cell (CHO-Cell) fermentation [85], including 2G12 used along with 2F5 and 4E10 antibodies as a cocktail. The CHO-Cell fermentation production method is very expensive and cannot produce enough mAbs on a scale required for the global market; therefore, plant manufacture of such mAbs may hopefully offer some solutions to lower production costs and improve output. The process yields five grams of purified antibody from 250 kg of tobacco and production costs could be 10 to 100 times lower than when using conventional bioreactors. This study has been designed to confirm the safety of a vaginally delivered mAb P2G12 derived from plants and manufactured to Good Manufacturing Practice (a quality standard used for the manufacture of medicinal products). The medicine is the first plant-produced antibody to be greenlit for clinical testing by Britain's Medicines and Healthcare products Agency (MHRA). It took about a year to get that agency's stamp of approval because it required assurances that the drugs did not contain allergenic plant sugars or pesticides. No matter how it is produced, P2G12 antibody has not been shown to actually prevent HIV-1 infection in clinical trials; thus a version made from tobacco plants would not see approval any time soon. P2G12 would also likely be just one ingredient in a cocktail of plant-produced antibodies [84].

MAbs against host receptors

To eliminate or reduce the development of escape variants it has been proposed that targeting the conserved cellular receptors of the virus may open new avenues for a viable antibody therapy for HIV infection. HIV entry into CD4+ T cells requires the presence of a co-receptor, either CCR5 or CXCR4, on the target cell. Thus, based on this hypothesis, mAbs directed against CD4 and against the co-receptor CCR5, have been developed and are being analyzed in clinical trials.

CD4 functions as a co-receptor, physically associating with the TCR during Ag recognition by binding to a non-polymorphic component of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules on the surface of the antigen-presenting cell. Ibalizumab, a humanized mAb, binds CD4 on T cell surface away from the binding site for MHC class II molecules. It does not inhibit gp120 binding to CD4 but appears to exert its antiviral property by post-binding conformational effects that prevent CD4-bound gp120 from interacting with CCR5 or CXCR4 [19, 86]. By contrast, other monoclonal antibodies, that competitively inhibit gp120 binding, interfere with MHC class II immune function [87, 88]. The reported human experience with Ibalizumab consists of three clinical trials. During phase I study, it was observed that peak mean reductions in viral load occurred later in the higher dose cohorts, whereas the extent and duration of viral suppression correlated with the degree of CD4+ cell coating by ibalizumab, which was maintained longer in the higher dose cohorts, with a duration of 15 to 34 days. Peak increases in CD4 counts at one day after infusion, well before the peak declines in viral load; this suggests that the increase may have been due to redistribution of CD4+ cells from lymphoid tissue rather than regeneration of CD4+ cells in the setting of viral suppression. A multidose study demonstrated continued safety over an extended treatment period and provided data on the development of ibalizumab resistance. Resistance testing showed reduced susceptibility relative to baseline. Resistant isolates remained dependent on CD4 for viral entry, suggesting that resistance did not develop through the use of alternative receptors. Genotypic analysis was unable to identify mutations, diagnostic of ibalizumab resistance. Consistent with the allosteric mechanism of ibalizumab's anti-HIV-1 effect, the development of resistance is associated with a reduction in the maximum percentage inhibition rather than the shift in the IC50 characteristic of competitive inhibitors [89, 90]. The half-life of IgGs under normal physiological circumstances is two to three weeks [91]. In contrast, the average half-life of ibalizumab is 3 to 3.5 days [89]. This is consistent with observations of other anti-CD4 antibodies, in which internalization or shedding of the receptor results in more rapid antibody degradation. A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, phase IIa study has evaluated the ibalizumab efficacy, the results showing a considerable viral load reduction with respect to the placebo arm [92].

CCR5 is a chemokine receptor that mediates activation and migration of T cells and other leukocytes. CCR5-using (R5) viruses typically mediate transmission and then predominate through the progression to symptomatic disease. Viruses can use an alternative chemokine receptor, CXCR4, either exclusively or in addition to CCR5. The CXCR4-using virus can be present initially, but tends to result in an increasing proportion of subjects in the later stages of the disease [93]. CCR5 co-receptor antagonists represent an emerging antiretroviral treatment class and the first to target a host molecule.

Currently, two anti-CCR5 mAbs are being investigated. One of these is CCR5mAb004, a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody with robust activity against a diverse panel of HIV-1 isolates; it synergizes in vitro with other ARV classes and appears safe and effective in reducing HIV viral load. High levels of receptor occupancy were observed for 14 to 28 days with the highest dose cohorts, suggesting the potential for weekly, fortnightly or even monthly dosing [94].

The other anti-CCR5 mAb is PRO 140, a humanized mAb that also synergizes with small-molecule CCR5 antagonists in laboratory studies [95]. PRO140 is being investigated in two modes of administration: the classical intravenous (IV) form, and subcutaneous (SC) form. The trial involving SC administration is the first to bear the proof of concept for a mAb administered subcutaneously in HIV-1 infected subjects as a potent and long-acting antiretroviral agent.

An IV form of PRO 140 tested as monotherapy in HIV-1 subjects with only R5 virus detectable [96] demonstrated potent and prolonged antiviral activity, with a 1.83 log10 mean reduction in HIV-1 RNA and safety relative to placebo. The successive randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled IIa trial examined the antiviral activity, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single intravenous infusions of up to 10-mg/kg of mAbs. All PRO 140-treated subjects treated with 10 mg/kg experienced a 1-log10-unit reduction in HIV-1 RNA level, there being just one exception; a post-study analysis using the enhanced-sensitivity Trofile assay determined that this subject had dual/mixed virus at screening. There was no change in co-receptor tropism or emergence of PRO 140-resistant virus during the course of this study, supporting the view that PRO 140 broadly inhibits R5 HIV-1 with a high barrier to resistance. The maximum tolerated dose of IV PRO 140 has not been determined, suggesting a sizeable margin of safety for PRO 140 SC administration study [97].

The study involving PRO 140 SC administration showed virologic suppression between successive doses and no changes in R5 viral susceptibility to PRO 140 following three weeks of monotherapy, indicating no adaptation of virus to use CCR5 in the presence of drug. Pharmacokinetic data suggest the possibility of a drug regimen administered fortnightly for HIV infected individuals. Proteins and other macromolecules drain from SC sites into both blood capillaries and the lymphatic system. In animals, proteins with molecular weights of greater than 16,000 daltons have been observed to drain primarily into the lymphatic system following SC administration [98]. Such proteins transit through lymph fluid and typically are not absorbed significantly into the blood until they reach the thoracic duct. Since the molecular weight of PRO 140 is approximately 150,000 daltons, a substantial amount of SC PRO 140 can be expected to drain into the lymphatic system and potentially encounter CCR5+ cells in lymphoid tissues prior to reaching the bloodstream. For these reasons, serum concentrations may not provide a full picture of the overall exposure following SC dosing of PRO 140. SC infusion is currently used by individuals with primary immunodeficiency to self-administer at home significantly larger amounts (approximately 11 grams) and volumes (approximately 70 mL total, up to 15 mL/site) of the weekly SC-administered immunoglobulin [99]. Self-administration of 324 mg SC PRO 140 would be much simpler in comparison. Therefore, SC PRO 140 offers the potential for significant dose-dependent HIV-1 RNA suppression and may offer greater convenience for many patients in terms of patient self-administration [100].

The SC injection mode was chosen in order to evaluate PRO140 safety and efficacy as an adjunct to an oral antiretroviral regimen in HIV-infected injection drug users with viral rebound and documented poor adherence to the previous antiretroviral regimen. Therefore, a phase IIb, national, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was initiated and is currently recruiting participants. Given the complications that arise from the occurrence of drug resistances, the use of antibodies together with combined therapy increases the drug number and, therefore, the therapeutic opportunities. In particular, in the case of CCR5 inhibitors, one report has demonstrated that resistance to CCR5 inhibitors may increase the sensitivity of the resistant virus to certain neutralizing antibodies [101].

Compared to CCR5, CXCR4-based blocking agents as therapy against HIV are less attractive due to the crucial role of CXCR4 in many biological processes, and the absence to date of known naturally occurring mutations leading to the inactivation of CXCR4 gene in humans. Moreover, one major problem is linked to the fact that, whereas R5 viruses are found on their own in 50% or more of patients, viruses that using CXCR4 co-receptor (X4) usually are present mixed together with R5 viruses; therefore, the use of CXCR4 specific mAbs could result in only little or transient effect on the overall viremia, also complicating the evaluation of pharmacological activity. However, antibodies against CXCR4 might still provide some benefits for some HIV positive patients when co-administrated with CCR5 antagonists, if the safety of such combinations is established [93].

There is a pressing need for antiviral agents that are effective against multiple classes of viruses. Broad specificity might be achieved by targeting phospholipids that are widely expressed on infected host cells or on viral envelopes. Phosphatidylserine (PS), the most abundant anionic phospholipid of the plasma membrane, is segregated at the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane of resting mammalian cells. Loss of PS asymmetry occurs during apoptosis, cell injury, cell activation and malignant transformation, and results from inhibition of the translocases or activation of PS exporters, or lipid scrambling enzymes, such as scramblases. After enveloped viruses replicate within the host cell, they create their 'envelope' by carrying along part of the host cell's membrane upon exiting. As a result, the target phospholipid becomes exposed on the surface of the virus as well as on the infected host cell [102].

Bavituximab is the first in a new class of patented antibody therapeutics that target and, preferentially bind, to these exposed phospholipids. It has demonstrated broad therapeutic potential across multiple oncology indications and represents a new approach to treating viral disease, too. Bavituximab is currently being evaluated in randomized phase II clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer, for therapy of chronic HCV infection and for HIV/HCV co-infection. The therapeutic effect of bavituximab appears to be due to ADCC of tumor and virus-infected cells. Since PS exposure is an early event during virus infection, ADCC may limit virus spread. Furthermore, in the infectious disease setting, bavituximab causes opsonization and clearance of infectious virus from the bloodstream, leaving less virus to infect other tissues. Three completed phase I HCV clinical trials have shown that bavituximab is generally safe and well-tolerated. Reductions in serum HCV RNA levels were also observed. A randomized phase II clinical trial with previously untreated HCV genotype-1 infected patients was designed to determine the early virologic response (EVR) rate after 12 weeks of therapy with bavituximab in combination with the antiviral drug ribavirin and safety profile versus pegylated IFN-α-2a and ribavirin. The results show that the combination of bavituximab with ribavirin has a better safety profile than an IFN-containing regimen. However, the EVR development in the bavituximab-containing arm was later than the IFN-containing group; therefore, a longer-term evaluation is needed to adequately compare their effectiveness. In addition, the lower dose level appears to be more active in HCV patients than the high dose does. Such results suggest that future studies evaluating longer bavituximab treatment durations at or around the lower dose level in combination with ribavirin and potentially direct acting antivirals in certain patient populations may hold promise as IFN-free HCV therapeutic regimens [103].

Targeting PS on cells infected with multiple different viruses and on virions themselves is a promising antiviral strategy. Although resistance has developed in monotherapy trials with ibalizumab (an anti-CD4 antibody), host-derived antigen, such as anionic phospholipids, on virus-infected cells are independent of the viral genome and as a consequence the acquisition of drug resistance should be theoretically less problematic than with agents that target virus-encoded components.

Immunomodulatory mAbs

Since the discovery of PD-1 as an inhibitory receptor associated with T-cell dysfunction, the roles of various inhibitory receptors on virus-specific CD8+ T cells have been extensively studied in human chronic viral infections, such as HCV, HBV and HIV infections. As blocking the inhibitory receptors in vitro restores the functions of virus-specific T cells, novel HIV and HCV treatments based on blockade of several immune checkpoint molecules are being investigated. In particular, mAbs interfering with two major inhibitory networks of the B7:CD28 family, namely the PD-1 and CTLA-4 pathways [104], are currently being studied in clinical trials, to evaluate their safety and efficacy. These mAbs recognize the PD-1 or CTLA-4 receptor and neutralize the binding with their respective ligands.

The PD-1:PD-L1 pathway delivers inhibitory signals which regulate T cell activation. As a result it performs a key role in various processes, namely in multiple tolerance checkpoints that prevent autoimmunity, in the suppressive tumor microenvironment, in the immune-mediated tissue damage, in host defenses aimed at eradicating microbial pathogens and tumors and finally, in T cell exhaustion that contributes to both lack of viral control during chronic infections and to T cell unresponsiveness [105]. In cancers, a strong correlation between increased PD-L1 expression on tumors and a negative survival prognosis in patients has already been observed. Various studies indicate that mAbs targeting the PD-1 signaling pathway reinvigorate antigen-specific T-cell responses and promote an immune response to fight tumors [106]. In HCV infection the relationship between the PD-1 expression and the outcome of the acute HCV infection was questioned; subsequently, recent studies have shown that the progression of acute HCV infection to the chronic stage is associated with a high level of PD-1 on HCV-specific CD8+ T cells, whereas the clearance of HCV infection is associated with lower levels of PD-1 expression [36].

Given these premises, MDX-1106, a fully human antibody also known as ONO-4538, and CT-011, a humanized antibody, both interacting with PD-1 receptor, are being developed as a treatment for cancer disease and for therapy of chronic HCV infection [107]. To date, most clinical experience with PD-1 blockade has been gained with MDX-1106 in the tumor setting. Drug-related grade 3 or 4 toxic effects occurred in 14% of patients, in whom there were drug-related adverse events of special interest, those with potential immune-related causes; they included pneumonitis, vitiligo, colitis, hepatitis, hypophysitis and thyroiditis. Pneumonitis (3%) ranged from isolated radiographic abnormalities to progressive, diffuse infiltrates associated with clinical symptoms in a small number of patients. Although three deaths occurred, mild-to-moderate pneumonitis was managed successfully with either observation or glucocorticoids. However, objective responses were observed in approximately one in four to one in five patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, or renal-cell cancer; overall, an adverse-event profile does not appear to preclude its use [108]. Besides these studies, an ongoing phase I safety trial with active hepatitis C genotype 1 infected patients has been designed to assess the safety and tolerability profile of MDX-1106 [109]. Clinical studies to evaluate the use of CT-011 in HCV disease have also been initiated [110].

CTLA-4 is up-regulated on activated T cells and inhibits T cell activation by reducing the production of IL-2 and arresting cell cycle progression. CTLA-4 has also been shown to have an impact on T cell responses in animal tumor models and humans [111, 112]. Human trials that used a blocking anti-CTLA-4 mAb demonstrated a reduction in tumor mass and clinical benefit in a substantial minority of treated subjects. Studies of the role for CTLA-4 in chronic infections have produced mixed results. In chronic HIV infection, many studies indicate that impaired CD4+ T cell function is associated with viral persistence [113], although the function of CTLA-4 in causing HIV persistence by suppressing T cell function remains unclear [114]. On the other hand, CTLA-4's role in chronic HCV infection seems to be more defined. The HCV-specific CD8+ T cells found in the livers of chronic HCV patients overexpressed not only PD-1, but also CTLA-4. Co-expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 was observed in liver-infiltrating lymphocytes, but not in peripheral blood lymphocytes [36], suggesting the phenotypic differences of virus-specific CD8+ T cells in different in vivo compartments. PD-1 and CTLA-4 expressing HCV-specific T cells were profoundly dysfunctional [115].

Tremelimumab is a fully human IgG2 mAb directed against CTLA-4. While a phase II study for HIV disease with this drug has been withdrawn prior to enrollment, clinical trials for HCV disease are still underway. Tremelimumab binds to activated T lymphocytes and results in inhibition of B7-CTLA-4-mediated down-regulation of T-cell activation. It also acts as an IL-2 stimulant. It was generated, using XenoMouse technology (Figure 2), as an anticancer agent and is currently in worldwide phase III development for malignant melanoma, phase II development for colorectal cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, gynecological cancer and non-small cell lung cancer in the US and other countries. It is also being investigated for prostate, breast and pancreatic cancer in various countries. As for anti-PD-1 antibodies, immune-related adverse effects of tremelimumab are of special interest because of its presumed mechanism of action. Most of the experience in identifying and managing CTLA-4 treatment-related side effects has derived from studies in cancer, particularly in melanoma. These effects mainly include colitis/diarrhea, dermatitis, hepatitis and endocrinopathies; uveitis, nephritis and inflammatory myopathy also have been occasionally reported. These unique side effects are likely a direct result of breaking immune tolerance upon CTLA-4 blockade; they are generally mild, reversible and manageable, following specific treatment guidelines that include symptomatic therapies or systemic corticosteroids [116]. In December 2008, Pfizer initiated a phase II trial in patients with late-stage unresectable liver cancer who also have hepatitis C infections. The primary endpoint of this single-armed study is the ability of tremelimumab to produce tumor responses among HCV-infected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and to produce changes in hepatitis C viral load. The first results indicate that tremelimumab demonstrated an excellent safety profile, with a promising antitumor efficacy against HCC in 17 patients, as well as an intense antiviral activity. In fact, a significant and progressive decline in serum HCV viral load was observed, this being associated with an increase in anti-HCV immune response in 76% of patients [117].

Since there are multiple levels of immunoregulation, a synergistic use of antibodies against different checkpoint molecules might represent the next stage in immunotherapy for chronic infectious diseases, as evidenced from ex vivo studies about the combined PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade in HCV disease [36]. Furthermore, because the host mechanisms that inhibit T cell activity are common and conserved aside from specific virus-encoded immune evasion strategies, the antibodies targeting inhibitory receptors may prove extremely versatile drugs potentially effective against multiple classes of viruses.


The need to treat HIV and HCV infectious diseases, two epidemics of global impact, has reawakened interest in mAb-based therapy, supporting a variety of clinical studies. The results that are emerging, will help to create models for the further development of such drugs and extend their use against other viruses as well.

Although the mAb production costs are high, increasing advances of biotechnology and production systems will make them more competitive on the market, and new approaches, such as using mAb cocktails or combining mAbs with available drugs, will improve effectiveness. Treatment with mAbs as part of a drug regimen is the most likely future for mAbs that block HCV and HIV infection in order to avoid viral escape, while chronic treatment could attract further investments from pharmaceutical companies. Furthermore, broad spectrum mAbs, such as bavituximab and immunomodulatory mAbs, could be useful against a whole range of diseases, thus extending marketability and profit margins.

This review has focused on the use of intact mAbs as a novel emerging and versatile class of pharmaceuticals. It is important to note, however, that biotechnology also provides the opportunity to build various antibody formats whose improved pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties could be co-opted in the fight against infectious diseases.

Authors' information

MF, after her Doctorate (Immunology, 2006, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Italy), was enrolled as a researcher at the Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation at the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy (ISS). She has acquired extensive expertise in biotechnologies, such as the isolation, characterization and genetic manipulation of human mAbs in single chain format for the development of biological constructs designed for clinical use.

AA, since after his Doctorate in Genetics and Molecular Biology (2005, University of Rome, La Sapienza, Italy), was enrolled as a researcher at the Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation at the ISS, where he has developed extensive skills in biotechnological strategies for the genetic manipulation of recombinant antibodies in order to design constructs suitable for clinical applications.

MC, since 2003, has been the Director of the Section of Pharmacogenetics, Drug Resistance and Experimental Therapeutics of the Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation at the ISS; he is an Expert Member of EMEA, Pharmaeuropa and ISS for the evaluation of biotech derived products and for GMP inspection. His research activities are mainly aimed at elucidating the complex phenomenon of multidrug resistance (MDR) through the identification of specific mAbs.

SV is currently the Director of the Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation at the ISS. The main research interests of Dr Vella are as follows: the development of antiretroviral therapy; the study of HIV resistance to antiretroviral drugs; the mechanisms of immune reconstitution; and, finally, operational and implementation research in resource limited settings. He chaired or participated in many international clinical studies on antiretroviral therapy, and he is currently the coordinator of the - European Commission-funded HIV Clinical Trials Network (NEAT).



antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity


complement-dependent cytotoxicity


Chinese Hamster Ovary cell




cytokine-release syndrome


cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4


fragment antigen-binding


fragment crystallizable


receptors for the Fc segment of IgA


receptors for the Fc segment of IgG


glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor


hepatitis A virus


hepatitis B virus


hepatitis C virus


human immunodeficiency virus










lymphocyte activation gene 3


lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus




monoclonal antibodies


major histocompatibility complex


neutralizing antibody


natural killer cell


programmed cell death 1




viruses that use only the CCR5 co-receptor


respiratory syncytial virus




T cell antigen receptor

TEM cells: 

effector memory T cells


transforming growth factor β


mucin domain protein 3


tumor necrosis factor

Treg cells: 

immunosuppressive regulatory T cells


vesicular stomatitis virus


viruses that use only the CXCR4 co-receptor.



This work was in part supported by an AIDS grant ('Phage display approaches for the isolation of human antibodies and their mimotopes to HIV-1 proteins for passive immunotherapy of HIV infection and to design new and effective anti-HIV biological therapeutics and vaccines') from the Italian Ministry of Health.

We thank Martin Bennett for his help in revising the manuscript for grammar and style.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicines Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità


  1. Abbas AK, Lichtman AH, Pober JS: Cellular and Molecular Immunology. 2010, Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 6
  2. Hemming VG: Use of intravenous immunoglobulins for prophylaxis or treatment of infectious diseases. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003, 8: 859-863.
  3. Casadevall A, Dadachova E, Pirofski LA: Passive antibody therapy for infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2: 695-703. 10.1038/nrmicro974.PubMed
  4. Alexander S, Elder JH: Carbohydrate dramatically influences immune reactivity of antisera to viral glycoprotein antigens. Science. 1984, 226: 1328-1330. 10.1126/science.6505693.PubMed
  5. Keller MA, Stiehm ER: Passive immunity in prevention and treatment of infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000, 13: 602-614. 10.1128/CMR.13.4.602-614.2000.PubMedPubMed Central
  6. Saylor C, Dadachova E, Casadevall A: Monoclonal antibody-based therapies for microbial diseases. Vaccine. 2009, 27 (Suppl 6): G38-G46.PubMedPubMed Central
  7. Lang AB, Cryz SJ, Schurch U, Ganss MT, Bruderer U: Immunotherapy with human monoclonal antibodies. Fragment A specificity of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies is crucial for full protection against tetanus toxin. J Immunol. 1993, 151: 466-472.PubMed
  8. Hsu JL, Safdar N: Polyclonal immunoglobulins and hyperimmune globulins in prevention and management of infectious diseases. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011, 25: 773-778. 10.1016/j.idc.2011.07.005.PubMed
  9. Marasco WA, Sui J: The growth and potential of human antiviral monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Nat Biotechnol. 2007, 25: 1421-1434. 10.1038/nbt1363.PubMed
  10. Carter PJ: Potent antibody therapeutics by design. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006, 6: 343-357. 10.1038/nri1837.PubMed
  11. Dimitrov DS: Virus entry: molecular mechanisms and biomedical applications. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2: 109-122. 10.1038/nrmicro817.PubMed
  12. Harrison SC: Mechanism of membrane fusion by viral envelope proteins. Adv Virus Res. 2005, 64: 231-261.PubMed
  13. Webster RG, Laver WG: Preparation and properties of antibody directed specifically against the neuraminidase of influenza virus. J Immunol. 1967, 99: 49-55.PubMed
  14. Parren PW, Burton DR: The antiviral activity of antibodies in vitro and in vivo. Adv Immunol. 2001, 77: 195-262.PubMed
  15. Moore JP, Sattentau QJ, Klasse PJ, Burkly LC: A monoclonal antibody to CD4 domain 2 blocks soluble CD4-induced conformational changes in the envelope glycoproteins of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-1 infection of CD4+ cells. J Virol. 1992, 66: 4784-4793.PubMedPubMed Central
  16. Trkola A, Ketas TJ, Nagashima KA, Zhao L, Cilliers T, Morris L, Moore JP, Maddon PJ, Olson WC: Potent, broad-spectrum inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by the CCR5 monoclonal antibody PRO 140. J Virol. 2001, 75: 579-588. 10.1128/JVI.75.2.579-588.2001.PubMedPubMed Central
  17. Zwick MB, Jensen R, Church S, Wang M, Stiegler G, Kunert R, Katinger H, Burton DR: Anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibodies 2F5 and 4E10 require surprisingly few crucial residues in the membrane-proximal external region of glycoprotein gp41 to neutralize HIV-1. J Virol. 2005, 79: 1252-1261. 10.1128/JVI.79.2.1252-1261.2005.PubMedPubMed Central
  18. Blanchard E, Belouzard S, Goueslain L, Wakita T, Dubuisson J, Wychowski C, Rouillé Y: Hepatitis C virus entry depends on clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Virol. 2006, 80: 6964-6972. 10.1128/JVI.00024-06.PubMedPubMed Central
  19. Burlone ME, Budkowska A: Hepatitis C virus cell entry: role of lipoproteins and cellular receptors. J Gen Virol. 2009, 90: 1055-1070. 10.1099/vir.0.008300-0.PubMed
  20. Meuleman P, Hesselgesser J, Paulson M, Vanwolleghem T, Desombere I, Reiser H, Leroux-Roels G: Anti-CD81 antibodies can prevent a hepatitis C virus infection in vivo. Hepatology. 2008, 48: 1761-1768. 10.1002/hep.22547.PubMed
  21. Molina S, Castet V, Pichard-Garcia L, Wychowski C, Meurs E, Pascussi JM, Sureau C, Fabre JM, Sacunha A, Larrey D, Dubuisson J, Coste J, McKeating J, Maurel P, Fournier-Wirth C: Serum-derived hepatitis C virus infection of primary human hepatocytes is tetraspanin CD81 dependent. J Virol. 2008, 82: 569-574. 10.1128/JVI.01443-07.PubMedPubMed Central
  22. Catanese MT, Ansuini H, Graziani R, Huby T, Moreau M, Ball JK, Paonessa G, Rice CM, Cortese R, Vitelli A, Nicosia A: Role of scavenger receptor class B type I in hepatitis C virus entry: kinetics and molecular determinants. J Virol. 2010, 84: 34-43. 10.1128/JVI.02199-08.PubMedPubMed Central
  23. Takai T: Fc receptors and their role in immune regulation and autoimmunity. J Clin Immunol. 2005, 25: 1-18. 10.1007/s10875-005-0353-8.PubMed
  24. Baum LL, Cassutt KJ, Knigge K, Khattri R, Margolick J, Rinaldo C, Kleeberger CA, Nishanian P, Henrard DR, Phair J: HIV-1 gp120-specific antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity correlates with rate of disease progression. J Immunol. 1996, 157: 2168-2173.PubMed
  25. Lambotte O, Ferrari G, Moog C, Yates NL, Liao HX, Parks RJ, Hicks CB, Owzar K, Tomaras GD, Montefiori DC, Haynes BF, Delfraissy JF: Heterogeneous neutralizing antibody and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity responses in HIV-1 elite controllers. AIDS. 2009, 23: 897-906. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328329f97d.PubMedPubMed Central
  26. Nattermann J, Schneiders AM, Leifeld L, Langhans B, Schulz M, Inchauspe G, Matz B, Brackmann H, Houghton M, Sauerbruch T: Serum antibodies against the hepatitis C virus E2 protein mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). J Hepatol. 2005, 42: 499-504.PubMed
  27. Machida K, Kondo Y, Huang JY, Chen YC, Cheng KT-H, Keck Z, Foung S, Dubuisson J, Sung VMH, Lai MM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced immunoglobulin hypermutation reduces the affinity and neutralizing activities of antibodies against HCV envelope protein. J Virol. 2008, 82: 6711-6720. 10.1128/JVI.02582-07.PubMedPubMed Central
  28. Jiang XR, Song A, Bergelson S, Arroll T, Parekh B, May K, Chung S, Strouse R, Mire-Sluis A, Schenerman M: Advances in the assessment and control of the effector functions of therapeutic antibodies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011, 10: 101-111. 10.1038/nrd3365.PubMed
  29. Sharpe AH, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R, Freeman GJ: The function of programmed cell death 1 and its ligands in regulating autoimmunity and infection. Nat Immunol. 2007, 8: 239-245. 10.1038/ni1443.PubMed
  30. Wherry EJ, Blattman JN, Murali-Krishna K, van der Most R, Ahmed R: Viral persistence alters CD8 T -cell immunodominance and tissue distribution and results in distinct stages of functional impairment. J Virol. 2003, 77: 4911-4927. 10.1128/JVI.77.8.4911-4927.2003.PubMedPubMed Central
  31. Klenerman P, Hill A: T cells and viral persistence: lessons from diverse infections. Nat Immunol. 2005, 6: 873-879. 10.1038/ni1241.PubMed
  32. Day CL, Kaufmann DE, Kiepiela P, Brown JA, Moodley ES, Reddy S, Mackey EW, Miller JD, Leslie AJ, DePierres C, Mncube Z, Duraiswamy J, Zhu B, Eichbaum Q, Altfeld M, Wherry EJ, Coovadia HM, Goulder PJ, Klenerman P, Ahmed R, Freeman GJ, Walker BD: PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells is associated with T -cell exhaustion and disease progression. Nature. 2006, 443: 350-354. 10.1038/nature05115.PubMed
  33. Barber DL, Wherry EJ, Masopust D, Zhu B, Allison JP, Sharpe AH, Freeman GJ, Ahmed R: Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature. 2006, 439: 682-687. 10.1038/nature04444.PubMed
  34. Blackburn SD, Shin H, Haining WN, Zou T, Workman CJ, Polley A, Betts MR, Freeman GJ, Vignali DA, Wherry EJ: Coregulation of CD8+ T cell exhaustion by multiple inhibitory receptors during chronic viral infection. Nat Immunol. 2009, 10: 29-37. 10.1038/ni.1679.PubMedPubMed Central
  35. Urbani S, Amadei B, Tola D, Massari M, Schivazappa S, Missale G, Ferrari C: PD-1 expression in acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with HCV-specific CD8 exhaustion. J Virol. 2006, 80: 11398-11403. 10.1128/JVI.01177-06.PubMedPubMed Central
  36. Nakamoto N, Cho H, Shaked A, Olthoff K, Valiga ME, Kaminski M, Gostick E, Price DA, Freeman GJ, Wherry EJ, Chang KM: Synergistic reversal of intrahepatic HCV-specific CD8 T cell exhaustion by combined PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5: e1000313-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000313.PubMedPubMed Central
  37. Boni C, Fisicaro P, Valdatta C, Amadei B, Di Vincenzo P, Giuberti T, Laccabue D, Zerbini A, Cavalli A, Missale G, Bertoletti A, Ferrari C: Characterization of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific T -cell dysfunction in chronic HBV infection. J Virol. 2007, 81: 4215-4225. 10.1128/JVI.02844-06.PubMedPubMed Central
  38. Wherry EJ, Ha SJ, Kaech SM, Haining WN, Sarkar S, Kalia V, Subramaniam S, Blattman JN, Barber DL, Ahmed R: Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity. 2007, 27: 670-684. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.09.006.PubMed
  39. Kaufmann DE, Kavanagh DG, Pereyra F, Zaunders JJ, Mackey EW, Miura T, Palmer S, Brockman M, Rathod A, Piechocka-Trocha A, Baker B, Zhu B, Le Gall S, Waring MT, Ahern R, Moss K, Kelleher AD, Coffin JM, Freeman GJ, Rosenberg ES, Walker BD: Upregulation of CTLA-4 by HIV-specific CD4+ T cells correlates with disease progression and defines a reversible immune dysfunction. Nat Immunol. 2007, 8: 1246-1254. 10.1038/ni1515.PubMed
  40. Jones RB, Ndhlovu LC, Barbour JD, Sheth PM, Jha AR, Long BR, Wong JC, Satkunarajah M, Schweneker M, Chapman JM, Gyenes G, Vali B, Hyrcza MD, Yue FY, Kovacs C, Sassi A, Loutfy M, Halpenny R, Persad D, Spotts G, Hecht FM, Chun TW, McCune JM, Kaul R, Rini JM, Nixon DF, Ostrowski MA: Tim-3 expression defines a novel population of dysfunctional T cells with highly elevated frequencies in progressive HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med. 2008, 205: 2763-2779. 10.1084/jem.20081398.PubMedPubMed Central
  41. Fourcade J, Sun Z, Benallaoua M, Guillaume P, Luescher IF, Sander C, Kirkwood JM, Kuchroo V, Zarour HM: Upregulation of Tim-3 and PD-1 expression is associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell dysfunction in melanoma patients. J Exp Med. 2010, 207: 2175-2186. 10.1084/jem.20100637.PubMedPubMed Central
  42. Yi JS, Cox MA, Zajac AJ: T -cell exhaustion: characteristics, causes and conversion. Immunology. 2010, 129: 474-481. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03255.x.PubMedPubMed Central
  43. Petrovas C, Casazza JP, Brenchley JM, Price DA, Gostick E, Adams WC, Precopio ML, Schacker T, Roederer M, Douek DC, Koup RA: PD-1 is a regulator of virus-specific CD8+ T cell survival in HIV infection. J Exp Med. 2006, 203: 2281-2292. 10.1084/jem.20061496.PubMedPubMed Central
  44. Trautmann L, Janbazian L, Chomont N, Said EA, Gimmig S, Bessette B, Boulassel MR, Delwart E, Sepulveda H, Balderas RS, Routy JP, Haddad EK, Sekaly RP: Upregulation of PD-1 expression on HIV-specific CD8+ T cells leads to reversible immune dysfunction. Nat Med. 2006, 12: 1198-1202. 10.1038/nm1482.PubMed
  45. Boettler T, Panther E, Bengsch B, Nazarova N, Spangenberg HC, Blum HE, Thimme R: Expression of the interleukin-7 receptor α chain (CD127) on virus-specific CD8+ T cells identifies functionally and phenotypically defined memory T cells during acute resolving hepatitis B virus infection. J Virol. 2006, 80: 3532-3540. 10.1128/JVI.80.7.3532-3540.2006.PubMedPubMed Central
  46. La S, Kim E, Kwon B: In vivo ligation of glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor enhances the T-cell immunity to herpes simplex virus type 1. Exp Mol Med. 2005, 37: 193-198.PubMed
  47. Hünig T: The storm has cleared: lessons from the CD28 superagonist TGN1412 trial. Nat Rev Immunol. 12: 317-318.
  48. Falkowska E, Kajumo F, Garcia E, Reinus J, Dragic T: Hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein E2 glycans modulate entry, CD81 binding, and neutralization. J Virol. 2007, 81: 8072-8079. 10.1128/JVI.00459-07.PubMedPubMed Central
  49. Timpe JM, Stamataki Z, Jennings A, Hu K, Farquhar MJ, Harris HJ, Schwarz A, Desombere I, Roels GL, Balfe P, McKeating JA: Hepatitis C virus cell-cell transmission in hepatoma cells in the presence of neutralizing antibodies. Hepatology. 2008, 47: 17-24.PubMed
  50. Witteveldt J, Evans MJ, Bitzegeio J, Koutsoudakis G, Owsianka AM, Angus AG, Keck ZY, Foung SK, Pietschmann T, Rice CM, Patel AH: CD81 is dispensable for hepatitis C virus cell-to-cell transmission in hepatoma cells. J Gen Virol. 2009, 90: 48-58. 10.1099/vir.0.006700-0.PubMedPubMed Central
  51. Wei X, Decker JM, Wang S, Hui H, Kappes JC, Wu X, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Salazar MG, Kilby JM, Saag MS, Komarova NL, Nowak MA, Hahn BH, Kwong PD, Shaw GM: Antibody neutralization and escape by HIV-1. Nature. 2003, 422: 307-312. 10.1038/nature01470.PubMed
  52. Zolla-Pazner S: Identifying epitopes of HIV-1 that induce protective antibodies. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004, 4: 199-210. 10.1038/nri1307.PubMed
  53. Prabakaran M, Prabhu N, He F, Hongliang Q, Ho HT, Qiang J, Meng T, Goutama M, Kwang J: Combination therapy using chimeric monoclonal antibodies protects mice from lethal H5N1 infection and prevents formation of escape mutants. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e5672-10.1371/journal.pone.0005672.PubMedPubMed Central
  54. ter Meulen J, van den Brink EN, Poon LL, Marissen WE, Leung CS, Cox F, Cheung CY, Bakker AQ, Bogaards JA, van Deventer E, Preiser W, Doerr HW, Chow VT, de Kruif J, Peiris JS, Goudsmit J: Human monoclonalantibody combination against SARS coronavirus: synergy and coverage of escape mutants. PLoS Med. 2006, 3: e237-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030237.PubMedPubMed Central
  55. Seiler P, Senn BM, Brundler MA, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H, Kalinke U: In vivo selection of neutralization-resistant virus variants but no evidence of B cell tolerance in lymphocyticchoriomeningitis virus carrier mice expressing a transgenic virus-neutralizing antibody. J Immunol. 1999, 162: 4536-4541.PubMed
  56. Walker LM, Simek MD, Priddy F, Gach JS, Wagner D, Zwick MB, Phogat SK, Poignard P, Burton DR: A limited number of antibody specificities mediate broad and potent serum neutralization in selected HIV-1 infected individuals. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6: e1001028-10.1371/journal.ppat.1001028.PubMedPubMed Central
  57. Lavillette D, Morice Y, Germanidis G, Donot P, Soulier A, Pagkalos E, Sakellariou G, Intrator L, Bartosch B, Pawlotsky JM, Cosset FL: Human serum facilitates hepatitis C virus infection, and neutralizing responses inversely correlate with viral replication kinetics at the acute phase of hepatitis C virus infection. J Virol. 2005, 79: 6023-6034. 10.1128/JVI.79.10.6023-6034.2005.PubMedPubMed Central
  58. Pestka JM, Zeisel MB, Bläser E, Schürmann P, Bartosch B, Cosset FL, Patel AH, Meisel H, Baumert J, Viazov S, Rispeter K, Blum HE, Roggendorf M, Baumert TF: Rapid induction of virus-neutralizing antibodies and viral clearance in a single-source outbreak of hepatitis C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 6025-6030. 10.1073/pnas.0607026104.PubMedPubMed Central
  59. Pawlotsky JM: Treatment failure and resistance with direct-acting antiviral drugs against hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2011, 53: 1742-1751. 10.1002/hep.24262.PubMed
  60. Gerlach JT, Diepolder HM, Jung MC, Gruener NH, Schraut WW, Zachoval R, Hoffmann R, Schirren CA, Santantonio T, Pape GR: Recurrence of hepatitis C virus after loss of virus-specific CD4(+) T-cell response in acute hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 1999, 117: 933-941. 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70353-7.PubMed
  61. Leav BA, Sloan S, Blair BM, Cheslock P, Knauber M, Ambrosino DM, Molrine DC: Safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel human monoclonal antibody directed against E2 glycoprotein of hepatitis C virus (MBL-HCV1) in healthy volunteers. EASL the International Liver Congress™: 30 March -3. 2011, Berlin, April
  62. Saphire EO, Parren PW, Pantophlet R, Zwick MB, Morris GM, Rudd PM, Dwek RA, Stanfield RL, Burton DR, Wilson IA: Crystal structure of a neutralizing human IGG against HIV-1: a template for vaccine design. Science. 2001, 293: 1155-1159. 10.1126/science.1061692.PubMed
  63. Muster T, Steindl F, Purtscher M, Trkola A, Klima A, Himmler G, Rüker F, Katinger H: A conserved neutralizing epitope on gp41 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 1993, 67: 6642-6647.PubMedPubMed Central
  64. Trkola A, Purtscher M, Muster T, Ballaun C, Buchacher A, Sullivan N, Srinivasan K, Sodroski J, Moore JP, Katinger H: Human monoclonal antibody 2G12 defines a distinctive neutralization epitope on the gp120 glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 1996, 70: 1100-1108.PubMedPubMed Central
  65. Scheid JF, Mouquet H, Feldhahn N, Seaman MS, Velinzon K, Pietzsch J, Ott RG, Anthony RM, Zebroski H, Hurley A, Phogat A, Chakrabarti B, Li Y, Connors M, Pereyra F, Walker BD, Wardemann H, Ho D, Wyatt RT, Mascola JR, Ravetch JV, Nussenzweig MC: Broad diversity of neutralizing antibodies isolated from memory B cells in HIV-infected individuals. Nature. 2009, 458: 636-640. 10.1038/nature07930.PubMed
  66. Günthard HF, Gowland PL, Schüpbach J, Fung MS, Böni J, Liou RS, Chang NT, Grob P, Graepel P, Braun DG, Lüthy R: A phase I/IIA clinical study with a chimeric mouse-human monoclonal antibody to the V3 loop of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120. J Infect Dis. 1994, 170: 1384-1393. 10.1093/infdis/170.6.1384.PubMed
  67. Schüpbach J, Günthard H, Fung MS, Liou RS, Botta L, Gowland P, Gordon W, Gygax D, Chang NT, Chang TW, Lüthy R, Braun DG: Pharmacokinetics of an HIV-1 gp120-specific chimeric antibody in patients with HIV-1 disease. Biotherapy. 1993, 6: 205-215. 10.1007/BF01878082.PubMed
  68. Cavacini LA, Samore MH, Gambertoglio J, Jackson B, Duval M, Wisnewski A, Hammer S, Koziel C, Trapnell C, Posner MR: Phase I study of a human monoclonal antibody directed against the CD4-binding site of HIV type 1 glycoprotein 120. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 1998, 14: 545-550. 10.1089/aid.1998.14.545.PubMed
  69. Wolfe EJ, Cavacini LA, Samore MH, Posner MR, Kozial C, Spino C, Trapnell CB, Ketter N, Hammer S, Gambertoglio JG: Pharmacokinetics of F105, a human monoclonal antibody, in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996, 59: 662-667. 10.1016/S0009-9236(96)90006-5.PubMed
  70. Dezube BJ, Doweiko JP, Proper JA, Conway B, Hwang L, Terada M, Leece BA, Ohno T, Mastico RA: Monoclonal antibody hNM01 in HIV-infected patients: a phase I study. J Clin Virol. 2004, 31 (Suppl. 1): S45-S47.PubMed
  71. Eda Y, Takizawa M, Murakami T, Maeda H, Kimachi K, Yonemura H, Koyanagi S, Shiosaki K, Higuchi H, Makizumi K, Nakashima T, Osatomi K, Tokiyoshi S, Matsushita S, Yamamoto N, Honda M: Sequential immunization with V3 peptides from primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 produces cross-neutralizing antibodies against primary isolates with a matching narrow-neutralization sequence motif. J Virol. 2006, 80: 5552-5562. 10.1128/JVI.02094-05.PubMedPubMed Central
  72. Zwick MB, Wang M, Poignard P, Stiegler G, Katinger H, Burton DR, Parren PW: Neutralization synergy of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolates by cocktails of broadly neutralizing antibodies. J Virol. 2001, 75: 12198-12208. 10.1128/JVI.75.24.12198-12208.2001.PubMedPubMed Central
  73. Volk WA, Bizzini B, Snyder RM, Bernhard E, Wagner RR: Neutralization of tetanus toxin by distinct monoclonal antibodies binding to multiple epitopes on the toxin molecule. Infect Immun. 1984, 45: 604-609.PubMedPubMed Central
  74. Nowakowski A, Wang C, Powers DB, Amersdorfer P, Smith TJ, Montgomery VA, Sheridan R, Blake R, Smith LA, Marks JD: Potent neutralization of botulinum neurotoxin by recombinant oligoclonal antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 11346-11350. 10.1073/pnas.172229899.PubMedPubMed Central
  75. Doria-Rose NA, Louder MK, Yang Z, O'Dell S, Nason M, Schmidt SD, Seaman K, McKee MS, Bailer RT, John R: Mascola neutralization coverage is improved by combining monoclonal antibodies that target independent epitopes HIV-1. J Virol. 2012, 86: 3393-3397. 10.1128/JVI.06745-11.PubMedPubMed Central
  76. Trkola A, Kuster H, Rusert P, Joos B, Fischer M, Leemann C, Manrique A, Huber M, Rehr M, Oxenius A, Weber R, Stiegler G, Vcelar B, Katinger H, Aceto L, Gunthard HF: Delay of HIV-1 rebound after cessation of antiretroviral therapy through passive transfer of human neutralizing antibodies. Nat Med. 2005, 11: 615-622. 10.1038/nm1244.PubMed
  77. Stiegler G, Kunert R, Purtscher M, Wolbank S, Voglauer R, Steindl F, Katinger H: A potent cross-clade neutralizing human monoclonal antibody against a novel epitope on gp41 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2001, 17: 1757-1765. 10.1089/08892220152741450.PubMed
  78. Purtscher M, Trkola A, Gruber G, Buchacher A, Predl R, Steindl F, Tauer C, Berger R, Barrett N, Jungbauer A, Katinger H: A broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibody against gp41 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 1994, 10: 1651-1658. 10.1089/aid.1994.10.1651.PubMed
  79. Armbruster C, Stiegler GM, Vcelar BA, Jager W, Koller U, Jilch R, Ammann CG, Pruenster M, Stoiber H, Katinger HW: Passive immunization with the anti-HIV-1 human monoclonal antibody (hMAb) 4E10 and the hMAb combination 4E10/2F5/2G12. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004, 54: 915-920. 10.1093/jac/dkh428.PubMed
  80. Armbruster C, Stiegler GM, Vcelar BA, Michael NL, Vetter N, Katinger HW: A phase I trial with two human monoclo-nal antibodies (hMAb 2F5, 2G12) against HIV-1. AIDS. 2002, 16: 227-233. 10.1097/00002030-200201250-00012.PubMed
  81. Joos B, Trkola A, Kuster H, Aceto L, Fischer M, Stiegler G, Armbruster C, Vcelar B, Katinger H, Günthard HF: Long-term multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope gp120 (MAb 2G12) and gp41 (MAbs 4E10 and 2F5). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50: 1773-1779. 10.1128/AAC.50.5.1773-1779.2006.PubMedPubMed Central
  82. Manrique A, Rusert P, Joos B, Fischer M, Kuster H, Leemann C, Niederöst B, Weber R, Stiegler G, Katinger H, Günthard HF, Trkola A: In vivo and in vitro escape from neutralizing antibodies 2G12, 2F5, and 4E10. J Virol. 2007, 81: 8793-8808. 10.1128/JVI.00598-07.PubMedPubMed Central
  83. Nakowitsch S, Quendler H, Fekete H, Kunert R, Katinger H, Stiegler G: HIV-1 mutants escaping neutralization by the human antibodies 2F5, 2G12, and 4E10: in vitro experiments versus clinical studies. AIDS. 2005, 19: 1957-1966. 10.1097/01.aids.0000189856.13817.76.PubMed
  84. Birch JR, Racher AJ: Antibody production. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006, 58: 671-685. 10.1016/j.addr.2005.12.006.PubMed
  85. Callaway E: Clinical trial of farmed HIV drug finally gets underway. [http://​blogs.​nature.​com/​news/​2011/​07/​plantbased_​drug.​html]
  86. Song R, Franco D, Kao CY, Yu F, Huang Y, Ho DD: Epitope mapping of ibalizumab, a humanized anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody with anti-HIV-1 activity in infected patients. J Virol. 2010, 84: 6935-6942. 10.1128/JVI.00453-10.PubMedPubMed Central
  87. Delmonico FL, Knowles RW, Colvin RB, Cavender DE, Kawai T, Bedle M, Stroka D, Preffer FI, Haug C, Cosimi AB: Immunosuppression of cynomolgus renal allograft recipients with humanized OKT4A monoclonal antibodies. Transplant Proc. 1993, 25: 784-785.PubMed
  88. Merkenschlager M, Buck D, Beverley PC, Sattentau QJ: Functional epitope analysis of the human CD4 molecule. The MHC class II-dependent activation of resting T cells is inhibited by monoclonal antibodies to CD4 regardless whether or not they recognize epitopes involved in the binding of MHC class II or HIV gp120. J Immunol. 1990, 145: 2839-2845.PubMed
  89. Jacobson JM, Kuritzkes DR, Godofsky E, DeJesus E, Larson JA, Weinheimer SP, Lewis ST: Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity of multiple doses of ibalizumab (formerly TNX-355), an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody, in human immuno-deficiency virus type 1-infected adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 450-457. 10.1128/AAC.00942-08.PubMedPubMed Central
  90. Kuritzkes DR, Jacobson J, Powderly WG, Godofsky E, DeJesus E, Haas F, Reimann KA, Larson JL, Yarbough PO, Curt V, Shanahan WR: Antiretroviral activity of the anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody TNX-355 in patients infected with HIV type 1. J Infect Dis. 2004, 189: 286-291. 10.1086/380802.PubMed
  91. LoBuglio AF, Wheeler RH, Trang J, Haynes A, Rogers K, Harvey EB, Sun L, Ghrayeb J, Khazaeli MB: Mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibody in man: kinetics and immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989, 86: 4220-4224. 10.1073/pnas.86.11.4220.PubMedPubMed Central
  92. Norris D, Morales J, Gathe J, Godofsky E, Garcia F, Hardwicke R, Lewis S: Phase 2 efficacy and safety of the novel entry inhibitor, TNX-355, in combination with optimized background regimen (OBR) [abstract no. TUPE0058]. AIDS. 2006, - XVI International AIDS Conference
  93. Alkhatib G: The biology of CCR5 and CXCR4. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009, 4: 96-103. 10.1097/COH.0b013e328324bbec.PubMedPubMed Central
  94. Lalezari J, Lederman M, Yadavalli G, Para M, Dejesus E, Searle L, Cai W, Rosche V, Zhong J, Hicks C, Freimuth W, Subramanian M: A phase 1, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled study of a fully human monoclonal antibody (CCR5mAb004) against CCR5 in patients with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection [Abstract H-1668]. 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy: 27-30. 2006, San Francisco, September
  95. Murga J, Franti M, Pevear DC, Maddon PJ, Olson WC: Potent antiviral synergy between monoclonal antibody and small-molecule CCR5 inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50: 3289-3296. 10.1128/AAC.00699-06.PubMedPubMed Central
  96. Pett SL, McCarthy MC, Cooper DA, MacRae K, Tendolkar A, Norris R, Strizki JM, Williams KM, Emery S: A phase I study to explore the activity and safety of SCH532706, a small molecule chemokine receptor-5 antagonist in HIV type-1-infected patients. Antivir Ther. 2009, 14: 111-115.PubMed
  97. Jacobson JM, Lalezari JP, Thompson MA, Fichtenbaum CJ, Saag MS, Zingman BS, D'Ambrosio P, Stambler N, Rotshteyn Y, Marozsan AJ, Maddon PJ, Morris SA, Olson WC: Phase 2a Study of the CCR5 Monoclonal Antibody PRO 140 Administered Intravenously to HIV-Infected Adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, 54: 4137-4142. 10.1128/AAC.00086-10.PubMedPubMed Central
  98. Porter CJ, Charman WN: Transport and absorption of drugs via the lymphatic system. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001, 50: 1-2.PubMed
  99. Ochs HD, Gupta S, Kiessling P, Nicolay U, Berger M: Safety and efficacy of self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. J Clin Immunol. 2006, 26: 265-273. 10.1007/s10875-006-9021-7.PubMed
  100. Jacobson JM, Thompson MA, Lalezari JP, Saag MS, Zingman BS, D'Ambrosio P, Stambler N, Rotshteyn Y, Marozsan AJ, Maddon PJ, Morris SA, Olson WC: Anti-HIV-1 activity of weekly or biweekly treatment with subcutaneous PRO 140, a CCR5 monoclonal antibody. J Infect Dis. 2010, 201: 1481-1487. 10.1086/652190.PubMedPubMed Central
  101. Pugach P, Ketas TJ, Michael E, Moore JP: Neutralizing antibody and anti-retroviral drug sensitivities of HIV-1 isolates resistant to small molecule CCR5 inhibitors. Virology. 2008, 377: 401-417. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.04.032.PubMedPubMed Central
  102. Soares MM, King SW, Thorpe PE: Targeting inside-out phosphatidylserine as a therapeutic strategy for viral diseases. Nat Med. 2008, 14: 1357-1362. 10.1038/nm.1885.PubMedPubMed Central
  103. Advancing clinical trials in cancer and viral infection: bavituximab antiviral. [http://​www.​peregrineinc.​com/​pipeline/​cot.​html]
  104. Francisco LM, Sage PT, Sharpe AH: The PD-1 pathway in tolerance and autoimmunity. Immunol Rev. 2010, 236: 219-242. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00923.x.PubMedPubMed Central
  105. Thompson RH, Kuntz SM, Leibovich BC, Dong H, Lohse CM, Webster WS, Sengupta S, Frank I, Parker AS, Zincke H, Blute ML, Sebo TJ, Cheville JC, Kwon ED: Tumor B7-H1 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients with long-term follow-up. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 3381-3385. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4303.PubMed
  106. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM: Targeting the PD-1/B7-H1(PD-L1) pathway to activate anti tumor immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012, 24: 207-212. 10.1016/j.coi.2011.12.009.PubMedPubMed Central
  107. Curetech. [http://​www.​curetechbio.​com/​?​TemplateID=​29&​PageID=​140&​TemplateType=​14]
  108. Topalian SL, Stephen Hodi F, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, Powderly JD, Carvajal RD, Sosman JA, Atkins MB, Leming PD, Spigel DR, Antonia SJ, Horn L, Drake CG, Pardoll DM, Chen L, Sharfman WH, Anders RA, Taube JM, McMiller TL, Xu H, Korman AJ, Jure-Kunkel M, Agrawal S, McDonald D, Kollia GD, Gupta A, Wigginton JM, Sznol M: Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 2443-54. 10.1056/NEJMoa1200690.PubMedPubMed Central
  109. Clinical a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health: A Study of MDX-1106 to Treat Patients with Hepatitis C Infection (MDX1106-01). [http://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT00703469?​term=​mdx-1106+hcv&​rank=​1]
  110. Clinical a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health: Safety and Tolerability Study of the Monoclonal Antibody CT-011 in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection. [http://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT00962936?​term=​ct011+hcv&​rank=​1]
  111. Hodi FS, Mihm MC, Soiffer RJ, Haluska FG, Butler M, Seiden MV, Davis T, Henry-Spires R, MacRae S, Willman A, Padera R, Jaklitsch MT, Shankar S, Chen TC, Korman A, Allison JP, Dranoff G: Biologic activity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody blockade in previously vaccinated metastatic melanoma and ovarian carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 4712-4717. 10.1073/pnas.0830997100.PubMedPubMed Central
  112. Phan GQ, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Hwu P, Topalian SL, Schwartzentruber DJ, Restifo NP, Haworth LR, Seipp CA, Freezer LJ, Morton KE, Mavroukakis SA, Duray PH, Steinberg SM, Allison JP, Davis TA, Rosenberg SA: Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 8372-8377. 10.1073/pnas.1533209100.PubMedPubMed Central
  113. Day CL, Walker BD: Progress in defining CD4 helper cell responses in chronic viral infections. J Exp Med. 2003, 198: 1773-1777. 10.1084/jem.20031947.PubMedPubMed Central
  114. Kaufmann DE, Walker BD: PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitory cosignaling pathways in HIV infection and the potential for therapeutic intervention. J Immunol. 2009, 182: 5891-5897. 10.4049/jimmunol.0803771.PubMedPubMed Central
  115. Nakamoto N, Kaplan DE, Coleclough J, Li Y, Valiga ME, Kaminski M, Shaked A, Olthoff K, Gostick E, Price DA, Freeman GJ, Wherry EJ, Chang KM: Functional restoration of HCV-specific CD8 T cells by PD-1 blockade is defined by PD-1 expression and compartmentalization. Gastroenterology. 2008, 134: 1927-1937. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.033.PubMedPubMed Central
  116. Di Giacomo AM, Biagioli M, Maio M: The emerging toxicity profiles of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies across clinical indications. Semin Oncol. 2010, 37: 499-507. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.09.007.PubMed
  117. Melero I, Sangro B, Riezu-Boj JI, Iñarrairaegui M, Lasarte JJ, Sarobe P, Larrea E, Prieto J: Antiviral and antitumoral effects of the anti-CTLA4 agent tremelimumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection: results from a phase II clinical trial [Abstract 4387]. AACR Annual Meeting 31 March - 4. 2012, Chicago, IL, USA, April
  118. Köhler G, Milstein C: Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature. 1975, 256: 495-497. 10.1038/256495a0.PubMed
  119. Morrison SL, Johnson MJ, Herzenberg LA, Oi VT: Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984, 81: 6851-6855. 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6851.PubMedPubMed Central
  120. Jones PT, Dear PH, Foote J, Neuberger MS, Winter G: Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse. Nature. 1986, 321: 522-525. 10.1038/321522a0.PubMed
  121. Vaswani SK, Hamilton RG: Humanized antibodies as potential therapeutic drugs. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998, 81: 105-115. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62794-9.PubMed
  122. Traggiai E, Becker S, Subbarao K, Kolesnikova L, Uematsu Y, Gismondo MR, Murphy BR, Rappuoli R, Lanzavecchia A: An efficient method to make human monoclonal antibodies from memory B cells: potent neutralization of SARS coronavirus. Nat Med. 2004, 10: 871-875. 10.1038/nm1080.PubMed
  123. Green LL: Antibody engineering via genetic engineering of the mouse: XenoMouse strains are a vehicle for the facile generation of therapeutic human monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol Methods. 1999, 231: 11-23. 10.1016/S0022-1759(99)00137-4.PubMed
  124. Hoogenboom HR: Selecting and screening recombinant antibody libraries. Nat Biotechnol. 2005, 23: 1105-1116. 10.1038/nbt1126.PubMed
  125. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1741-7015/​11/​4/​prepub


© Flego et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.