Summative assessments are more powerful drivers of student learning than resource intensive teaching formats
© Raupach et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 2 October 2012
Accepted: 5 March 2013
Published: 5 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris McManus|
|27 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olle Ten Cate|
|26 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy Blue|
|12 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tobias Raupach|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olle Ten Cate|
|7 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris McManus|
|8 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tobias Raupach|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tobias Raupach|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|15 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|5 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|5 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-61|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.