Are weekend inpatient rehabilitation services value for money? An economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial with a 30 day follow up
© Brusco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 9 January 2014
Accepted: 24 April 2014
Published: 29 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jan 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julie Ratcliffe|
|12 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - helen weatherly|
|9 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Natasha Brusco|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julie Ratcliffe|
|23 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - helen weatherly|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|29 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-12-89|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.