Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – A clinically empirical approach to its definition and study
© Reeves et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 06 June 2005
Accepted: 15 December 2005
Published: 15 December 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Jun 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jun 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Komaroff|
|18 Oct 2005||Author responded||Author comments - William Reeves|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Oct 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Nov 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Komaroff|
|30 Nov 2005||Author responded||Author comments - William Reeves|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Nov 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Dec 2005||Author responded||Author comments - William Reeves|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Dec 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Dec 2005||Editorially accepted|
|15 Dec 2005||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-3-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.