Information for decision making from imperfect national data: tracking major changes in health care use in Kenya using geostatistics
© Gething et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 31 May 2007
Accepted: 11 December 2007
Published: 11 December 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 May 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Aug 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Basile Chaix|
|7 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pierre Goovaerts|
|10 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Gething|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Basile Chaix|
|26 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Gething|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Dec 2007||Editorially accepted|
|11 Dec 2007||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-5-37|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.