Clinical characterization and the mutation spectrum in Swedish adenomatous polyposis families
© Kanter-Smoler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 28 February 2008
Accepted: 24 April 2008
Published: 24 April 2008
The dominantly inherited condition familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by germline mutations in the APC gene. Finding the causative mutations has great implications for the families. Correlating the genotypes to the phenotypes could help to improve the diagnosis and follow-up of patients.
Mutation screening of APC and the clinical characterization of 96 unrelated FAP patients from the Swedish Polyposis Registry was performed. In addition to generally used mutation screening methods, analyses of splicing-affecting mutations and investigations of the presence of low-frequency mutation alleles, indicating mosaics, have been performed, as well as quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect lowered expression of APC.
Sixty-one different APC mutations in 81 of the 96 families were identified and 27 of those are novel. We have previously shown that 6 of the 96 patients carried biallelic MUTYH mutations. The 9 mutation-negative cases all display an attenuated or atypical phenotype. Probands with a genotype (codon 1250–1464) predicting a severe phenotype had a median age at diagnosis of 21.8 (range, 11–49) years compared with 34.4 (range, 14–57) years among those with mutations outside this region (P < 0.017). Dense polyposis (> 1000) occurred in 75% of the probands with a severe phenotype compared with 30% in those with mutations outside this region. The morbidity in colorectal cancer among probands was 25% at a mean age of 37.5 years and 29% at a mean age of 46.6 years.
Using a variety of mutation-detection techniques, we have achieved a 100% detection frequency in classical FAP. Probands with APC mutations outside codon 1250–1464, although exhibiting a less-severe phenotype, are at high risk of having a colorectal cancer at diagnosis indicating that age at diagnosis is as important as the severity of the disease for colorectal cancer morbidity.
The dominantly inherited condition familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by germline mutations in the APC gene (5q21-q22; MIM#175100) [1, 2]. The classical FAP phenotype is defined by hundreds to thousands of adenomatous polyps that develop in the large intestine, conferring a high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). A variety of extra-colonic manifestations exist in FAP. Duodenal adenomas are common and carcinomas of the duodenum are a main cause of death in FAP patients. Patients also have an increased risk of developing extra-intestinal tumors, for example, desmoids. Recently, a new type of colorectal adenomatous polyposis has been described, MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP)  or MUTYH-associated CRC (MIM#608456). MAP is caused by biallelic mutations in the MUTYH (mutY homologue; MIM*604933) gene (1p32.1-p34.3) and is inherited in a recessive manner [4, 5].
The majority of germline APC mutations identified in FAP families cause truncations in this multifunctional protein [6, 7]. The APC truncations most often occur as the result of nonsense APC mutations or frameshifts caused by small deletions/insertions. Large APC deletions are found in a limited number of FAP cases. By using methods such as quantitative real-time PCR (polymerase chain reaction) or MLPA (multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) rather than conventional mutation-detection techniques, we can achieve higher detection rates of large deletions [8–12]. The number of reported characterized APC splice-site mutations is comparatively low [13–17]. Approximately 10–15% of the FAP patients could have a reduced or absent APC expression . The cause of the reduced expression is not known but the patients show a similar phenotype to those with an identified truncating APC mutation [19–21]. It has been shown that a decrease of approximately 50% of the expression of an allele can result in a predisposition to FAP . Germline APC-mutation mosaicism in FAP patients has been reported [22–25] but is not generally included in the mutation screening procedure provided by most labs owing to the technical difficulties encountered with these analyses.
Different genotype-phenotype correlations in FAP have been suggested [26–28]. The classic phenotype is primarily caused by mutations in the central part of the APC gene. Mutations around codon 1309 cause a severe course of disease with early onset and profuse polyposis. The milder, attenuated form of disease (AFAP), characterized by less than 100 adenomas and later onset of adenomatosis and CRC, is often caused by mutations in the far 5' and 3' regions of the APC gene, as well as in the part excluded by alternative splicing of exon 9 .
In the present study patients included in the Swedish Polyposis Registry were subjected to a thorough clinical characterization and mutational screening of the APC gene including screening for large deletions and detection of low-frequency alleles caused by germline mosaicism. Sixty-one mutations, including 27 not described previously, are reported. Among the characterized mutations are elusive changes such as a case of mosaicism, splicing defects, and a mutation in APC exon 1 which is the most 5' APC mutation hitherto reported. The detection of reduced APC expression in one family is also described. A combination of mutation screening techniques was used to achieve as high a mutation-detection frequency as possible.
Patients without any detected mutation in APC or MUTYH
Number of polyps
Patient C896, with only five adenomas, was included because of a family history of FAP. Patient C107 underwent her first colonoscopy due to intestinal bleeding at age 47. At diagnosis, 10–20 small (less than 10 mm) polyps were found in most colorectal parts. Tubular and tubulovillous adenomas were removed yearly. At age 50, carcinoma (Dukes A) was diagnosed 4 cm from valvula Bauhini in conjunction with several new adenomas. At that time the patient underwent total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA).
DNA, RNA and cDNA preparation
Genomic DNA was isolated from samples of venous blood, anti-coagulated in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). DNA purification was performed using the PuregeneR DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue as described previously . Histopaque (Sigma, St Louis, MO) or Lymphoprep (Axis-Shield PoC AS, Oslo, Norway) was used for purification of the lymphocytes, and total RNA was extracted using RNA-Stat 60 (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX). cDNA was synthesized as described previously .
Molecular genetic analysis of the APCgene
Mutational screening of APC was initialized with DNA (exon 15) and, whenever possible, RNA-based (exons 1–14) PTT (protein truncation test). SSCP/HD (single-strand conformational polymorphism/heteroduplex), D-HPLC (denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography) on the Wave instrument (Transgenomic, Omaha, NE), and/or DNA sequencing was applied for screening of exons 1–14. DNA sequencing of exon 15 was performed when no mutation had been detected in the initial search. Patients C107, C257 and C505 with no documented inheritance of FAP and where no mutation in the entire APC or MUTYH genes could be detected, were subjected to analyses for mosaic mutations using SSCP/HD. PCR, RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase PCR), SSCP/HD, and PTT were carried out as described previously  with the following changes: the Criterion Tris-HCl 8–16% gels and Criterion Gel Electrophoresis System (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) were used for the PTT. Primers used for PCR amplification of genomic DNA for subsequent DNA sequencing or PTT are available from the authors upon request. Taq DNA polymerase (Amersham Biosciences Corp, Piscataway, NJ or Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) was used for PCR amplification prior to DNA sequencing. DNA sequencing was performed on PCR products purified with ExoSAP-IT (USB, Cleveland, OH). Sequence reactions were carried out using ABI Prism Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and analyzed on the ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's protocol. MLPA  was used to detect deletions/duplications of one or more exons and was carried out as described by Meuller et al . All MLPA analyses were carried out in duplicates and normalized against two different control individuals. All mutations described in this study were verified in a second independent analysis using, as far as possible, an alternative mutation-detection technique.
Analyses of APCexpression
The level of APC mRNA expression in peripheral blood cells was investigated by TaqMan quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis in 29 patients from 18 families. RT-PCR was carried out using ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) at the Gothenburg Genomics Core Facility. Primers and probe for the APC gene as well as for GAPD, which was used as internal control, were obtained from . Amplification reactions were performed for the two genes separately in a volume of 10 μl containing 1 μl template cDNA diluted 1:10, 1 × FAM-labeled Assay-on-Demand Gene Expression Assay Mix, and 1 × TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Thermal cycling was performed according to the standard protocol. Triple samples of each patient were analyzed and no-template controls were included in the experiments. As the standard curve method for quantification of RT-PCR products would be used, a series of dilutions of calibrator cDNA were also included. The fluorescence intensities detected during the PCR process were analyzed and converted into threshold cycle values (Ct-values) using the SDS 2.0 software (Applied Biosystems). Using the obtained standard curve for each gene, the concentration of APC and GAPD in each sample was calculated from the mean Ct value of each triplicate. The APC value was then normalized against the housekeeping gene GAPD to obtain a relative measurement of the level of APC expression in the blood of the patient. The Dunnett t-test was used to calculate statistical significance. To verify the expression data, cDNA from the positive individuals was sequenced over an informative heterozygous cSNP position (c.5465A > T). The level of expression of each allele could then be estimated.
Student's t-test was used to analyze continuous data, and Fisher's exact test was used to analyze categorical data. Differences were considered statistically significant at a level of P < 0.05.
Large deletions of the APCgene
Seven of the identified APC mutations were large deletions, ranging from a deletion of 86 bp in exon 15 to a deletion of the whole APC gene (Figure 1C). Three of these deletions have not, to the best of the authors' knowledge, been described earlier. The deletion encompassing APC exon 4 in patient 3765, c.423-1662_531+1825del3595, was detected by RNA-based PTT with subsequent cDNA sequencing and verified by long-range PCR on genomic DNA. We could not detect this deletion with MLPA even though a probe for exon 4 is included in the MLPA kit (see the discussion). Detection of the large deletion in patient C591, encompassing APC exons 13 through the 5' part of exon 15, was carried out with MLPA. The deletion in patient 2136 was identified by PTT and subsequent DNA sequencing.
A case of APCmosaicism
Mutation at the far 5'end
DNA sequencing of APC exon 1 in patient C157 revealed the c.70C > T substitution which introduces a nonsense mutation in codon 24 (Figure 1). The mutation was also detectable by SSCP/HD analysis but was not detectable by PTT due to its localization close to the 5' end of the PTT fragment. However, indication for a mutation was observed as lowered intensity of the full-length fragment.
Splice-site affecting mutations
A family with reduced APCexpression
The APC mutations identified in the Swedish patients are scattered along the APC gene (Figure 1). The most 5' situated pathogenic germ line APC mutation identified in this study, in codon 24 of exon 1 (c.70C > T), was detected when analyzing patient C157. This may be the most 5' location of any mutation detected in the coding region of APC (Figure 1). Codon 24 is within the oligomerization domain at the N-terminus of APC, encoded by amino acids 6–57 . The most 3' situated mutation identified in the present study (C159) is a frameshift at codon 1920. The most frequently found mutation was the well-known c.3927_3931del AAAGA (amino acid position 1309) mutation detected in 10 out of the 95 patients. The recurrent mutation c.3183_3187delACAAA (amino acid 1061) was found in four patients. The frequency of de novo mutation cases was 16% which is lower than the estimation of 20–25% reported by Bisgaard et al . The most frequent mutation occurring de novo was c.3927_3931del AAAGA (3 out of 10 cases, 30%) compared with mutations at other sites in the gene (7 out of 55 cases, 12.7%).
The clinical characterization of the APC-mutation positive patients is summarized in Additional file 1 and the characterization of APC- and MUTYH-mutation negative patients are presented in Table 1. Probands with mutations between codon 1250 and 1468 in the APC gene, which predict a severe course of the colorectal polyposis  were significantly younger at diagnosis compared with those with mutations outside this region and seem to have more colorectal polyps. Despite a lower fraction of patients with dense polyposis among those with mutations outside codon 1250–1464, CRC at diagnosis occurred often. High age at diagnosis can probably explain the relatively high risk of having CRC at diagnosis in this subgroup of probands. Early detection because of short patients and delay by doctors may explain the relatively low fraction of patients having CRC at diagnosis among those where the site of the mutation and clinical features indicate a more severe phenotype. Overall, the risk for a proband of having a CRC at diagnosis was lower than previously reported by Björk et al  where 67% of the probands diagnosed between 1912 and 1996 had CRC at diagnosis. In this previous study a continued decrease in CRC morbidity among probands was seen over time being 48% in the last period studied (1977–1996). In this current study 84% (27 out of 32) of the probands were diagnosed with FAP during that period or later (after 1976). Nine of the 27 (33%) probands had CRC at diagnosis, which indicates a continued decrease in CRC at diagnosis over time. This is in agreement with our other findings. Except for more rapid detection of symptomatic patients with classical FAP in recent years, a shift over time of probands being diagnosed with FAP towards a less-severe phenotype, might explain the decrease in CRC morbidity.
The phenotype of the patient (C157), carrying the c.70C > T mutation, is in agreement with the suggested genotype-phenotype correlation where a milder form of polyposis is proposed to be caused by mutations in the 5' end of the gene. A model for the attenuated phenotype in patients carrying mutations in the first four exons of APC have been suggested by Heppner Goss et al , in which the internal ATG at codon 184 could be used as an alternative translation initiation codon in the allele carrying a truncating mutation upstream of this site (Figure 1). Such an alternative start of translation would supply the cell with an APC protein of almost full length, thus explaining the attenuated phenotype. Patient C159, with the most 3' localized mutation was a case of attenuated FAP (100–1000 polyps, 46 years of age at diagnosis). In family 1 (reduced expression of APC), patient C152 displayed a classical FAP phenotype including a large number of polyps, duodenal adenomas, and fundic gland polyps (Additional file 1).
The APC- and MUTYH-mutation negative patients all display an attenuated form of disease with a low number of polyps, comparably high age at diagnosis, and a low frequency of extracolonic manifestations. Whether these patients really are affected by APC-associated FAP can (of course) be called into question. However, among attenuated cases of FAP in these study we have found very subtle mutations such as the mosaic case as well as the c.70C > T mutation and splice-site mutations. Considering these facts, at least some of the cases could be caused by mutations in APC resulting in only partially inactivation of the gene function. Since the main purpose of this study was to achieve as high mutation-detection rate as possible in families with colorectal polyposis syndromes, using a range of different molecular genetic techniques, we have not yet performed any further analyses of the relatively few mutation negative cases to determine if they belong to non-polyposis CRC syndromes.
Large deletions of the APCgene
The fraction of large deletions of all APC mutations identified in the Swedish patients was 9%, which is higher than the 5% of large deletions reported in . The relatively large number of gross deletions identified could be a result of the thorough analysis applied for every patient, including the use of the MLPA technique. It is noteworthy that no deletion of APC exon 4 in patient 3765 was detected using MLPA although it had been identified and confirmed by other methods. A still untested possibility is that exon 4 has been translocated to another chromosomal locus and thus generates the positive MLPA result.
A case of APCmosaicism
Screening for mosaic mutations in the three APC- and MUTYH-negative patients with de novo mutations revealed the c.2700_2701delTC mutation in patient C107. This mutation was detected in a very low fraction of the lymphocytes and was only detectable using the SSCP/HD analysis (Figure 2A). Owing to the subtle appearance of this mutation it could easily have been overlooked.
The phenotype of patient C107 does not fit the generally accepted genotype-phenotype correlation of AFAP, in which the disease-causing mutations are situated either in the 5' or 3' regions or the alternatively spliced part of exon 9 (see the introduction). A speculative reason for the attenuated phenotype could be that the patient is mosaic in the epithelial cells of the colon. The parents of patient C107 of age 73 and 80 years as well as her three children, age 31–40 years, were free of polyps. No CRC has been diagnosed on either the maternal or paternal side of the family. The mutation was not detected in blood samples from the patient's parents or from her three children. It is possible that either gonadal or somatic mosaicism exists in patient C107.
APC mutational mosaicism could be a reason for the quite large number of de novo or sporadic FAP cases that exist [23–25, 40]. In the family of C107 the mutation has not been passed on to the offspring of the patient and, thus, this appears to be a sporadic case, but, generally, the existence of mosaicism is a risk of error in predictive diagnosis in FAP/AFAP families . In the initial stages, the molecular screening procedure of FAP/AFAP patients uses mainly PCR-based methods for analysis of the APC gene in DNA from isolated blood samples. Therefore, the chances of detecting pathogenic low-frequency APC mutations that are present only in a small fraction of the peripheral blood cells or only in the colon are poor. Approximately 25% of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients have been shown to be cases of mosaicism . When investigating NF2 mutational mosaicism, the search for constitutional mutations is preferably carried out initially in tumor cells. Detected mutations could subsequently be verified in blood leukocyte samples. However, this approach would not be applicable for FAP mosaisicm as somatic APC mutations are frequently found in tumors.
Splice-site affecting mutations
Two novel germline APC mutations that introduce different cryptic splice sites are characterized in this study. Both mutations result in the aberrant splicing of APC exons 7 and 8 and prematurely truncated APC protein, and both are defined as pathogenic. The aberrant splicing identified in patient C496 (c.835-7T > G) is caused by an introduction of a new active splice site 6 bp upstream of the wildtype AG splice site of intron 7. This acceptor site is apparently preferred by the splicing machinery, as shown by the results of the cDNA sequencing (Figure 3). The c.834G > C substitution at the last nucleotide of exon 7 in patient C633, would theoretically introduce a missense mutation at codon 278. However, as demonstrated by the cDNA sequencing results (Figure 4) the mutation leads to the use of a cryptic splice donor site 11 bp upstream in exon 7. This real outcome of the mutation would easily have been overlooked unless the RNA-based methods had been used. Other examples of aberrant splicing of the APC gene due to missense mutations have recently been described . One case of use of aberrant splice-acceptor site of APC exon 8 has been reported previously in a patient with classical polyposis . However, an alternative acceptor splice site (c.845-17A > G) in intron 7 has been reported from a patient with a milder phenotype, multiple synchronous colorectal adenomas .
Owing to the fact that RNA-based PTT was used at the initial stage of the mutational screening, detection of the disease-causing splice-site mutations was straightforward. Sequencing of genomic DNA was then used to pinpoint the genetic alteration causing the aberrant mRNA sequence that was visualized in the PTT experiments. The use of both DNA- and mRNA-based methods is a prerequisite for high-quality investigation of splice-site mutations.
A case of reduced APCexpression
The study of mRNA levels was the next step in the line of investigation of the cause of disease in patients with no detected APC mutation. Family 1 is the largest kindred in the Swedish Polyposis Registry; this family includes 150 individuals of whom 57 are affected by the disease (Figure 6 shows part of the pedigree). However, no pathogenic mutation had been detected after screening the whole coding region of the APC gene but as the family did show positive linkage to the APC locus we decided to perform expression analyses and evidence of lowered APC expression was obtained by quantitative real-time PCR (Figure 5A). The result was supported by the indication of a lower expression from the T-allele from analysis of the APC c.5465A > T polymorphism in the cDNA sequencing diagram of two affected family members (Figure 5B). The search for mutations in the DNA sequence of the APC promoters has been initiated, but no pathogenic change has been detected to this date. The possibility of the pathogenic change being epigenetic will have to be investigated further. Hypermethylation of CpG sites in the promoter of APC has been reported as a means of gene silencing in colorectal tumors [46–49]. To the best of the authors' knowledge no germ-line inactivation of APC caused by promoter hypermethylation has been reported. However, cases of pathogenic germline epimutations have been identified in the MLH1 gene, which causes hereditary non-polyposis CRC [50, 51].
The 61 different APC mutations listed in Additional file 2 were identified among 81 of the 96 families of the Swedish Polyposis Registry that were screened for APC mutations. Fifteen of the cases shown to be APC-mutation negative where all subjected to mutational screening of the MUTYH gene and six of them were shown to carry biallelic MUTYH mutations (reported in Kanter Smoler et al). The overall mutation-detection rate in APC and MUTYH among the families in our study was thus 90%. In total, 84% of the families carried APC mutations while 6% where positive for biallelic MUTYH mutations. The mutation-detection rate we have reached in this study is notably high. In fact, a disease-causing mutation was detected in all cases who presented with a classical FAP phenotype (except for family 1 (C152), where we have clear indications for inactivation of the APC transcription). The mutation-negative patients all display an attenuated form of disease. However, as we have also found subtle mutations in the APC gene in patients with attenuated FAP, we have to consider inactivation of APC to be responsible for some of these FAP cases.
We want to emphasize the importance of using a combination of techniques to achieve the highest mutation-detection frequency possible and it is also noteworthy that RNA-based screening is of importance when conducting a highly sensitive mutation-detection screening program as a number of mutations might otherwise be overlooked. The use of mRNA analyses has been crucial in order to detect and characterize splice variants and also to complement MLPA analyses. The MLPA method has improved and simplified the screening procedure significantly, but it is important to remember the limits of the method, which in our study is exemplified by a possible translocation that is not detectable by MLPA. Furthermore, the need to detect elusive APC changes such as mosaicism, which are not easily identified using standard techniques, remains. Such APC mutations may be the cause of some of the so-far unresolved de novo cases of attenuated or atypical FAP. Clinical data from this study indicate that the risk of having CRC at diagnosis among probands with mutations outside the region codon 1250–1464, although exhibiting a less-severe phenotype, is high indicating that age at diagnosis rather than severity of the disease predicts CRC morbidity. Early detection of probands contributes to the decrease in overall CRC morbidity seen in FAP in recent years.
We gratefully acknowledge all of the families that contributed to this study. The TaqMan experiments were performed at the Gothenburg Genomics Core Facility at University of Gothenburg. The study was supported financially by the The Swedish Cancer Society, The Swedish state under the LUA agreement, the King Gustav V Jubilee Clinic Cancer Research Foundation and the Assar Gabrielsson Clinical Research Foundation.
- Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W, Carlson M, Gelbert L, Albertsen H, Joslyn G, Stevens J, Spirio L, Robertson M, Sargeant L, Krapcho K, Wolff Burtd, Hughes JP, Warrington J, McPherson J, Wasmuth J, Le Paslier D, Abderrahim H, Cohen C, Leppert M, White R: Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell. 1991, 66 (3): 589-600. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90021-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Vogelstein B, Bryan TM, Levy DB, Smith KJ, Preisinger AC, Hamilton SR, Hedge P, Markham A, Carlson M, Joslyn G, Groden J, White R, Miki Y, Miyoshi Y, Nishisho I, Nakamura Y: Identification of a gene located at chromosome 5q21 that is mutated in colorectal cancers. Science. 1991, 251 (4999): 1366-1370. 10.1126/science.1848370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lipton L, Halford SE, Johnson V, Novelli MR, Jones A, Cummings C, Barclay E, Sieber O, Sadat A, Bisgaard ML, Hodgson SV, Aaltonen LA, Thomas HJ, Tomlinson IP: Carcinogenesis in MYH-associated polyposis follows a distinct genetic pathway. Cancer Res. 2003, 63 (22): 7595-7599.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Tassan N, Chmiel NH, Maynard J, Fleming N, Livingston AL, Williams GT, Hodges AK, Davies DR, David SS, Sampson JR, Cheadle JP: Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic G:C-->T:A mutations in colorectal tumors. Nat Genet. 2002, 30 (2): 227-232. 10.1038/ng828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones S, Emmerson P, Maynard J, Best JM, Jordan S, Williams GT, Sampson JR, Cheadle JP: Biallelic germline mutations in MYH predispose to multiple colorectal adenoma and somatic G:C-->T:A mutations. Hum Mol Genet. 2002, 11 (23): 2961-2967. 10.1093/hmg/11.23.2961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fearnhead NS, Britton MP, Bodmer WF: The ABC of APC. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10 (7): 721-733. 10.1093/hmg/10.7.721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nathke IS: The adenomatous polyposis coli protein: the Achilles heel of the gut epithelium. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004, 20: 337-366. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.012103.094541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renkonen ET, Nieminen P, Abdel-Rahman WM, Moisio AL, Jarvela I, Arte S, Jarvinen HJ, Peltomaki P: Adenomatous polyposis families that screen APC mutation-negative by conventional methods are genetically heterogeneous. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (24): 5651-5659. 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.712.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sieber OM, Lamlum H, Crabtree MD, Rowan AJ, Barclay E, Lipton L, Hodgson S, Thomas HJ, Neale K, Phillips RK, Farrington SM, Dunlop MG, Mueller HJ, Bisgaard ML, Bulow S, Fidalgo P, Albuquerque C, Scarano MI, Bodmer W, Tomlinson IP, Heinimann K: Whole-gene APC deletions cause classical familial adenomatous polyposis, but not attenuated polyposis or "multiple" colorectal adenomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (5): 2954-2958. 10.1073/pnas.042699199.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Meuller J, Kanter-Smoler G, Nygren AO, Errami A, Grönberg H, Holmberg E, Björk J, Wahlström J, Nordling M: Identification of genomic deletions of the APC gene in familial adenomatous polyposis by two independent quantitative techniques. Genet Test. 2004, 8: 248-256. 10.1089/gte.2004.8.248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aretz S, Stienen D, Uhlhaas S, Pagenstecher C, Mangold E, Caspari R, Propping P, Friedl W: Large submicroscopic genomic APC deletions are a common cause of typical familial adenomatous polyposis. J Med Genet. 2005, 42 (2): 185-192. 10.1136/jmg.2004.022822.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Michils G, Tejpar S, Thoelen R, van Cutsem E, Vermeesch JR, Fryns JP, Legius E, Matthijs G: Large deletions of the APC gene in 15% of mutation-negative patients with classical polyposis (FAP): a Belgian study. Hum Mutat. 2005, 25 (2): 125-134. 10.1002/humu.20122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varesco L, Gismondi V, Presciuttini S, Groden J, Spirio L, Sala P, Rossetti C, De Benedetti L, Bafico A, Heouaine A, Grammatico G, Porto R, White R, Bertario L, Ferrara GB: Mutation in a splice-donor site of the APC gene in a family with polyposis and late age of colonic cancer death. Hum Genet. 1994, 93 (3): 281-286. 10.1007/BF00212023.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wallis YL, Morton DG, McKeown CM, Macdonald F: Molecular analysis of the APC gene in 205 families: extended genotype-phenotype correlations in FAP and evidence for the role of APC amino acid changes in colorectal cancer predisposition. J Med Genet. 1999, 36 (1): 14-20.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Charames GS, Cheng H, Gilpin CA, Hunter AG, Berk T, Bapat B: A novel aberrant splice site mutation in the APC gene. J Med Genet. 2002, 39 (10): 754-757. 10.1136/jmg.39.10.754.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Aretz S, Uhlhaas S, Sun Y, Pagenstecher C, Mangold E, Caspari R, Moslein G, Schulmann K, Propping P, Friedl W: Familial adenomatous polyposis: aberrant splicing due to missense or silent mutations in the APC gene. Hum Mutat. 2004, 24 (5): 370-380. 10.1002/humu.20087.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neklason DW, Solomon CH, Dalton AL, Kuwada SK, Burt RW: Intron 4 mutation in APC gene results in splice defect and attenuated FAP phenotype. Fam Cancer. 2004, 3 (1): 35-40. 10.1023/B:FAME.0000026824.85766.22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laken SJ, Papadopoulos N, Petersen GM, Gruber SB, Hamilton SR, Giardiello FM, Brensinger JD, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW: Analysis of masked mutations in familial adenomatous polyposis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96 (5): 2322-2326. 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2322.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Powell SM, Petersen GM, Krush AJ, Booker S, Jen J, Giardiello FM, Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW: Molecular diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 1993, 329 (27): 1982-1987. 10.1056/NEJM199312303292702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan H, Dobbie Z, Gruber SB, Markowitz S, Romans K, Giardiello FM, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: Small changes in expression affect predisposition to tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2002, 30 (1): 25-26. 10.1038/ng799.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Venesio T, Balsamo A, Rondo-Spaudo M, Varesco L, Risio M, Ranzani GN: APC haploinsufficiency, but not CTNNB1 or CDH1 gene mutations, accounts for a fraction of familial adenomatous polyposis patients without APC truncating mutations. Lab Invest. 2003, 83 (12): 1859-1866. 10.1097/01.LAB.0000106722.37873.8D.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Powell SM, Zilz N, Beazer-Barclay Y, Bryan TM, Hamilton SR, Thibodeau SN, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW: APC mutations occur early during colorectal tumorigenesis. Nature. 1992, 359 (6392): 235-237. 10.1038/359235a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farrington SM, Dunlop MG: Mosaicism and sporadic familial adenomatous polyposis. Am J Hum Genet. 1999, 64 (2): 653-658. 10.1086/302236.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Aretz S, Stienen D, Friedrichs N, Stemmler S, Uhlhaas S, Rahner N, Propping P, Friedl W: Somatic APC mosaicism: a frequent cause of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Hum Mutat. 2007, 28 (10): 985-992. 10.1002/humu.20549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hes FJ, Nielsen M, Bik EC, Konvalinka D, Wijnen JT, Bakker E, Vasen HF, Breuning MH, Tops CM: Somatic APC mosaicism: an underestimated cause of polyposis coli. Gut. 2008, 57 (1): 71-76. 10.1136/gut.2006.117796.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galiatsatos P, Foulkes WD: Familial adenomatous polyposis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006, 101 (2): 385-398. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00375.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarvinen HJ, Peltomäki P: The complex genotype-phenotype relationship in familial adenomatous polyposis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004, 16 (1): 5-8. 10.1097/00042737-200401000-00002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bisgaard ML, Bulow S: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): genotype correlation to FAP phenotype with osteomas and sebaceous cysts. American journal of medical genetics. 2006, 140 (3): 200-204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knudsen AL, Bisgaard ML, Bulow S: Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP). A review of the literature. Fam Cancer. 2003, 2 (1): 43-55. 10.1023/A:1023286520725.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bjork J, Akerbrant H, Iselius L, Alm T, Hultcrantz R: Epidemiology of familial adenomatous polyposis in Sweden: changes over time and differences in phenotype between males and females. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999, 34 (12): 1230-1235. 10.1080/003655299750024751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanter-Smoler G, Bjork J, Fritzell K, Engwall Y, Hallberg B, Karlsson G, Gronberg H, Karlsson P, Wallgren A, Wahlstrom J, Hultcrantz R, Nordling M: Novel findings in Swedish patients with MYH-associated polyposis: mutation detection and clinical characterization. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006, 4 (4): 499-506. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.01.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Einbeigi Z, Bergman A, Kindblom LG, Martinsson T, Meis-Kindblom JM, Nordling M, Suurkula M, Wahlstrom J, Wallgren A, Karlsson P: A founder mutation of the BRCA1 gene in Western Sweden associated with a high incidence of breast and ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2001, 37 (15): 1904-1909. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00223-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bjork J, Akerbrant H, Iselius L, Bergman A, Engwall Y, Wahlstrom J, Martinsson T, Nordling M, Hultcrantz R: Periampullary adenomas and adenocarcinomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: cumulative risks and APC gene mutations. Gastroenterology. 2001, 121 (5): 1127-1135. 10.1053/gast.2001.28707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G: Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (12): e57-10.1093/nar/gnf056.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- TaqMan Expression Assays. [http://marketing.appliedbiosystems.com/mk/get/ALLGENES_MS_LANDING]
- Nieuwenhuis MH, Vasen HF: Correlations between mutation site in APC and phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): a review of the literature. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2007, 61 (2): 153-161. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.07.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Splice site prediction tool. [http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html]
- Stenson PD, Ball EV, Mort M, Phillips AD, Shiel JA, Thomas NS, Abeysinghe S, Krawczak M, Cooper DN: Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD): 2003 update. Hum Mutat. 2003, 21 (6): 577-581. 10.1002/humu.10212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joslyn G, Richardson DS, White R, Alber T: Dimer formation by an N-terminal coiled coil in the APC protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90 (23): 11109-11113. 10.1073/pnas.90.23.11109.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bisgaard ML, Fenger K, Bulow S, Niebuhr E, Mohr J: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): frequency, penetrance, and mutation rate. Hum Mutat. 1994, 3 (2): 121-125. 10.1002/humu.1380030206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nieuwenhuis MH, Mathus-Vliegen LM, Slors FJ, Griffioen G, Nagengast FM, Schouten WR, Kleibeuker JH, Vasen HF: Genotype-phenotype correlations as a guide in the management of familial adenomatous polyposis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007, 5 (3): 374-378. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heppner Goss K, Trzepacz C, Tuohy TM, Groden J: Attenuated APC alleles produce functional protein from internal translation initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (12): 8161-8166. 10.1073/pnas.112072199.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mandl M, Kadmon M, Sengteller M, Caspari R, Propping P, Friedl W: A somatic mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene in peripheral blood cells–implications for predictive diagnosis. Hum Mol Genet. 1994, 3 (6): 1009-1011. 10.1093/hmg/3.6.1009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kluwe L, Mautner V, Heinrich B, Dezube R, Jacoby LB, Friedrich RE, MacCollin M: Molecular study of frequency of mosaicism in neurofibromatosis 2 patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. J Med Genet. 2003, 40 (2): 109-114. 10.1136/jmg.40.2.109.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pedemonte S, Sciallero S, Gismondi V, Stagnaro P, Biticchi R, Haeouaine A, Bonelli L, Nicolo G, Groden J, Bruzzi P, Aste H, Varesco L: Novel germline APC variants in patients with multiple adenomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1998, 22 (4): 257-267. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199808)22:4<257::AID-GCC1>3.0.CO;2-U.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hiltunen MO, Alhonen L, Koistinaho J, Myohanen S, Paakkonen M, Marin S, Kosma VM, Janne J: Hypermethylation of the APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene promoter region in human colorectal carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1997, 70 (6): 644-648. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970317)70:6<644::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-V.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esteller M, Sparks A, Toyota M, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Capella G, Peinado MA, Gonzalez S, Tarafa G, Sidransky D, Meltzer SJ, Baylin SB, Herman JG: Analysis of adenomatous polyposis coli promoter hypermethylation in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2000, 60 (16): 4366-4371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deng G, Song GA, Pong E, Sleisenger M, Kim YS: Promoter methylation inhibits APC gene expression by causing changes in chromatin conformation and interfering with the binding of transcription factor CCAAT-binding factor. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (8): 2692-2698. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arnold CN, Goel A, Niedzwiecki D, Dowell JM, Wasserman L, Compton C, Mayer RJ, Bertagnolli MM, Boland CR: APC Promoter Hypermethylation Contributes to the Loss of APC Expression in Colorectal Cancers with Allelic Loss on 5q. Cancer Biol Ther. 2004, 3: 960-964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gazzoli I, Loda M, Garber J, Syngal S, Kolodner RD: A hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma case associated with hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene in normal tissue and loss of heterozygosity of the unmethylated allele in the resulting microsatellite instability-high tumor. Cancer Res. 2002, 62 (14): 3925-3928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suter CM, Martin DI, Ward RL: Germline epimutation of MLH1 in individuals with multiple cancers. Nat Genet. 2004, 36 (5): 497-501. 10.1038/ng1342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedl W, Caspari R, Sengteller M, Uhlhaas S, Lamberti C, Jungck M, Kadmon M, Wolf M, Fahnenstich J, Gebert J, Möslein G, Mangold E, Propping P: Can APC mutation analysis contribute to therapeutic decisions in familial adenomatous polyposis? Experience from 680 FAP families. Gut. 2001, 48 (4): 515-521. 10.1136/gut.48.4.515.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Miyoshi Y, Ando H, Nagase H, Nishisho I, Horii A, Miki Y, Mori T, Utsunomiya J, Baba S, Petersen G, Hamilton SR, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Nakamura Y: Germ-line mutations of the APC gene in 53 familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (10): 4452-4456. 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4452.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lamlum H, Ilyas M, Rowan A, Clark S, Johnson V, Bell J, Frayling I, Efstathiou J, Pack K, Payne S, Roylance R, Gorman P, Sheer D, Neale K, Phillips R, Talbot I, Bodmer W, Tomlinson I: The type of somatic mutation at APC in familial adenomatous polyposis is determined by the site of the germline mutation: a new facet to Knudson's 'two-hit' hypothesis. Nat Med. 1999, 5 (9): 1071-1075. 10.1038/12511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moisio AL, Jarvinen H, Peltomaki P: Genetic and clinical characterisation of familial adenomatous polyposis: a population based study. Gut. 2002, 50 (6): 845-850. 10.1136/gut.50.6.845.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nagase H, Miyoshi Y, Horii A, Aoki T, Petersen GM, Vogelstein B, Maher E, Ogawa M, Maruyama M, Utsunomiya J, Baba S, Nakamura Y: Screening for germ-line mutations in familial adenomatous polyposis patients: 61 new patients and a summary of 150 unrelated patients. Hum Mutat. 1992, 1 (6): 467-473. 10.1002/humu.1380010603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ripa R, Bisgaard ML, Bulow S, Nielsen FC: De novo mutations in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Eur J Hum Genet. 2002, 10 (10): 631-637. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olschwang S, Laurent-Puig P, Groden J, White R, Thomas G: Germ-line mutations in the first 14 exons of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1993, 52 (2): 273-279.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Miyaki M, Konishi M, Kikuchi-Yanoshita R, Enomoto M, Igari T, Tanaka K, Muraoka M, Takahashi H, Amada Y, Fukayama M, Maeda Y, Iwama T, Mishima Y, Mori T, Koike M: Characteristics of somatic mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene in colorectal tumors. Cancer Res. 1994, 54 (11): 3011-3020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Truta B, Allen BA, Conrad PG, Weinberg V, Miller GA, Pomponio R, Lipton LR, Guerra G, Tomlinson IP, Sleisenger MH, Kim YS, Terdiman JP: A comparison of the phenotype and genotype in adenomatous polyposis patients with and without a family history. Fam Cancer. 2005, 4 (2): 127-133. 10.1007/s10689-004-5814-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luijt van der RB, Khan PM, Vasen HF, Tops CM, van Leeuwen-Cornelisse IS, Wijnen JT, Klift van der HM, Plug RJ, Griffioen G, Fodde R: Molecular analysis of the APC gene in 105 Dutch kindreds with familial adenomatous polyposis: 67 germline mutations identified by DGGE, PTT, and southern analysis. Hum Mutat. 1997, 9 (1): 7-16. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1997)9:1<7::AID-HUMU2>3.0.CO;2-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garcia-Lozano JR, Cordero C, Fernandez-Suarez A, Encarnacion M, Pizarro A, Nunez-Roldan A: APC germ-line mutations in southern Spanish patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: genotype-phenotype correlations and identification of eight novel mutations. Genet Test. 2005, 9 (1): 37-40. 10.1089/gte.2005.9.37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paul P, Letteboer T, Gelbert L, Groden J, White R, Coppes MJ: Identical APC exon 15 mutations result in a variable phenotype in familial adenomatous polyposis. Hum Mol Genet. 1993, 2 (7): 925-931. 10.1093/hmg/2.7.925.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nilbert M, Fernebro J, Kristoffersson U: Novel germline APC mutations in Swedish patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and Gardner syndrome. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000, 35 (11): 1200-1203. 10.1080/003655200750056691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dobbie Z, Spycher M, Mary JL, Haner M, Guldenschuh I, Hurliman R, Amman R, Roth J, Muller H, Scott RJ: Correlation between the development of extracolonic manifestations in FAP patients and mutations beyond codon 1403 in the APC gene. J Med Genet. 1996, 33 (4): 274-280.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Norheim Andersen S, Lovig T, Fausa O, Rognum TO: Germline and somatic mutations in exon 15 of the APC gene and K-ras mutations in duodenal. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999, 34 (6): 611-7. 10.1080/003655299750026083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/6/10/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.