Physicians' experiences with end-of-life decision-making: Survey in 6 European countries and Australia
© Löfmark et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 15 October 2007
Accepted: 12 February 2008
Published: 12 February 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Oct 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Clive Seale|
|26 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Akira Akabayashi|
|2 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Tore Nilstun|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Akira Akabayashi|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Feb 2008||Editorially accepted|
|12 Feb 2008||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-6-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.