Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations
© McManus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 05 June 2007
Accepted: 14 February 2008
Published: 14 February 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Jun 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lambert Schuwirth|
|8 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ed Peile|
|15 Sep 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Chris McManus|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Sep 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ed Peile|
|29 Oct 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Chris McManus|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|29 Oct 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Feb 2008||Editorially accepted|
|14 Feb 2008||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-6-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.