Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Brief psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression

  • John Cape1, 2Email author,
  • Craig Whittington2,
  • Marta Buszewicz3,
  • Paul Wallace3 and
  • Lisa Underwood4
BMC Medicine20108:38

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-38

Received: 20 May 2010

Accepted: 25 June 2010

Published: 25 June 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
20 May 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - John Cape
Resubmission - Version 3
27 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
25 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-8-38

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London
Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London Medical School
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London