Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial

  • Claire M Rickard1Email author,
  • Damhnat McCann2,
  • Jane Munnings3 and
  • Matthew R McGrail4
BMC Medicine20108:53

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-53

Received: 13 April 2010

Accepted: 10 September 2010

Published: 10 September 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antoni Trilla
9 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louise Rose
10 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith
8 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Matthew McGrail
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antoni Trilla
24 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louise Rose
3 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith
22 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Matthew McGrail
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
10 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
10 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-8-53

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University
(2)
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Tasmania
(3)
St Luke's Hospital, Calvary Tasmania
(4)
Gippsland Medical School, Monash University

Advertisement