Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection and guide to antibiotic decisions: past, present and future

BMC Medicine20119:107

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-107

Received: 4 May 2011

Accepted: 22 September 2011

Published: 22 September 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Niederman
3 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Konrad Reinhart
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Alice Holt
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Niederman
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
22 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-9-107

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Harvard School of Public Health
(2)
University Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse

Advertisement