Procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection and guide to antibiotic decisions: past, present and future
© Schuetz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 4 May 2011
Accepted: 22 September 2011
Published: 22 September 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 May 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Niederman|
|3 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Konrad Reinhart|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Alice Holt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Niederman|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Sep 2011||Editorially accepted|
|22 Sep 2011||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-9-107|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.