Predicting streptococcal pharyngitis in adults in primary care: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs and validation of the Centor score
- Jolien Aalbers†1, 2,
- Kirsty K O'Brien†1,
- Wai-Sun Chan1,
- Gavin A Falk1,
- Conor Teljeur3,
- Borislav D Dimitrov1 and
- Tom Fahey1Email author
© Aalbers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 29 March 2011
Accepted: 1 June 2011
Published: 1 June 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Kirsty O'Brien|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Kirsty O'Brien|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Jun 2011||Editorially accepted|
|1 Jun 2011||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-9-67|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.