Efficacy of aerobic exercise and a prudent diet for improving selected lipids and lipoproteins in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
© Kelley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 13 December 2010
Accepted: 15 June 2011
Published: 15 June 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Dec 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Williams|
|20 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bettina Mittendorfer|
|18 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Staudte|
|31 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - George Kelley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Staudte|
|12 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Williams|
|21 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - George Kelley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jun 2011||Editorially accepted|
|15 Jun 2011||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-9-74|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.