Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines
© Schuster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 9 February 2011
Accepted: 17 June 2011
Published: 17 June 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aymeric Guillot|
|7 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ruth Dickstein|
|4 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Oliver Amft|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aymeric Guillot|
|22 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Oliver Amft|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Jun 2011||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jun 2011||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-9-75|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.