Comparative review of three cost-effectiveness models for rotavirus vaccines in national immunization programs; a generic approach applied to various regions in the world
- Maarten J Postma1,
- Mark Jit†2,
- Mark H Rozenbaum†1,
- Baudouin Standaert†3,
- Hong-Anh Tu1 and
- Raymond CW Hutubessy4Email author
© Postma et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 4 March 2011
Accepted: 8 July 2011
Published: 8 July 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Milne|
|21 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carol Levin|
|7 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carol Levin|
|11 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Jul 2011||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jul 2011||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-9-84|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.