Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
© Patel; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 22 May 2014
Accepted: 14 July 2014
Published: 30 July 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 May 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Moher|
|18 Jun 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Doug Altman|
|9 Jul 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Jigisha Patel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Jul 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jul 2014||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jul 2014||Article published||10.1186/s12916-014-0128-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.