Predicting fitness to practise events in international medical graduates who registered as UK doctors via the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) system: a national cohort study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 10 November 2016
Accepted: 27 February 2017
Published: 20 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Wilkinson|
|29 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ryan Brydges|
|27 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Tiffin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Wilkinson|
|20 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Tiffin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Tiffin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12916-017-0829-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.