Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cycling and bone health: a systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
20 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
20 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-10-168

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement