Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How well do clinical prediction rules perform in identifying serious infections in acutely ill children across an international network of ambulatory care datasets?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fernando Ferrero
10 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Wyer
17 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nader Shaikh
15 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
25 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fernando Ferrero
25 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nader Shaikh
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Wyer
14 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 7
14 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
23 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 8
23 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 8
23 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Verbakel
Resubmission - Version 9
23 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
15 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-11-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement