This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
New perspectives on evolutionary medicine: the relevance of microevolution for human health and disease
© Ruhli and Henneberg; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 November 2012
Accepted: 7 February 2013
Published: 29 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ze'ev Hochberg|
|20 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Bruene|
|8 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Frank Ruhli|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ze'ev Hochberg|
|21 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Bruene|
|3 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Frank Ruhli|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|3 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|8 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Frank Ruhli|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|8 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|7 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|29 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-11-115|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.