Skip to main content

Table 4 Hazard ratios of cancer mortality according to the frequency of nut consumption (including and not including walnuts)

From: Frequency of nut consumption and mortality risk in the PREDIMED nutrition intervention trial

Cancer mortality

Never

1 to 3 servings/week

>3 servings/week

Pfor trend

Frequency of total nut consumption:

n = 2,118

n = 2,803

n = 2,295

 

Cancer death, % (n)

2.1 (44)

1.9 (52)

1.5 (34)

 

Person-years, n

8,724

12,168

10,185

 

Crude model

1 (Reference)

0.82 (0.55 to 1.23)

0.64 (0.41 to 1.00)

0.070

Multivariable model 1

1 (Reference)

0.77 (0.51 to 1.16)

0.54 (0.34 to 0.86)

0.015

Multivariable model 2

1 (Reference)

0.79 (0.52 to 1.20)

0.60 (0.37 to 0.96)

0.052

Multivariable model 3

1 (Reference)

0.79 (0.52 to 1.20)

0.60 (0.37 to 0.98)

0.064

Frequency of walnut consumption:

n = 2,916

n = 2,547

n = 1,753

 

Cancer death, % (n)

2.1 (62)

1.9 (48)

1.1 (20)

 

Person-years, n

12,124

11,122

7,825

 

Crude model

1 (Reference)

0.82 (0.56 to 1.20)

0.48 (0.29 to 0.80)

0.005

Multivariable model 1

1 (Reference)

0.76 (0.52 to 1.12)

0.41 (0.25 to 0.69)

0.001

Multivariable model 2

1 (Reference)

0.77 (0.52 to 1.14)

0.46 (0.27 to 0.77)

0.003

Multivariable model 3

1 (Reference)

0.76 (0.51 to 1.12)

0.46 (0.27 to 0.79)

0.005

Frequency of consumption of other nuts (excluding walnuts):

n = 3,308

n = 2,643

n = 1,265

 

Cancer death, % (n)

2.0 (66)

1.6 (43)

1.7 (21)

 

Person-years, n

13,936

11,573

5,566

 

Crude model

1 (Reference)

0.77 (0.52 to 1.13)

0.79 (0.48 to 1.29)

0.439

Multivariable model 1

1 (Reference)

0.74 (0.50 to 1.10)

0.68 (0.41 to 1.14)

0.213

Multivariable model 2

1 (Reference)

0.79 (0.53 to 1.18)

0.73 (0.43 to 1.23)

0.318

Multivariable model 3

1 (Reference)

0.79 (0.53 to 1.18)

0.75 (0.44 to 1.27)

0.369

  1. One serving of nuts equals 28 g. Cox regression models were used to assess the risk of cancer mortality by frequency of nut consumption. Multivariable model 1 was adjusted for age (years), sex, and intervention group. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for BMI (kg/m2), smoking status (never, former, current smoker), educational level (illiterate/primary education, secondary education, academic/graduate), leisure time physical activity (MET-min/day), history of diabetes (yes/no), history of hypercholesterolemia (yes/no), use of oral antidiabetic medication (yes/no), use of antihypertensive medication (yes/no), use of statins (yes/no), and total energy intake (kcal/day). Model 3 was also adjusted for dietary variables in quintiles (vegetables, fruits, red meat, eggs, and fish), alcohol intake (continuous, adding a quadratic term) and Mediterranean diet adherence (13-point score). All models were stratified by recruitment centre. Extremes of total energy intake were excluded.