Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Gough
2 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Kleijnen
17 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Geoff Wong
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Geoff Wong
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Kleijnen
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
29 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-11-20

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement