Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlations in the 1980 Cohort Study

From: The Academic Backbone: longitudinal continuities in educational achievement from secondary school and medical school to MRCP(UK) and the specialist register in UK medical students and doctors

 

Mean GCSE/O-level grade

Best three A-levels

First year BMS outcome

Second year BMS outcome

Finals outcome

On Specialist Register

Continuous censored

Continuous censored

Ordinal

Ordinal

Continuous

Binary

Mean GCSE/O-level grade

1

0.406

0.192

0.209

0.175

-0.022

  

P <0.001

P <0.001

P <0.001

P = 0.002

NS

n = 562

n = 542

n = 528

n = 313

n = 391

Best three A-levels

0.438 ± 0.035 (0.358 to 0.503)

1

0.190

0.249

0.307

0.045

P <0.001

P <0.001

P <0.001

NS

n = 562

n = 548

n = 328

n = 403

First year BMS outcome

0.226 ± 0.041 (0.130 to 0.298)

0.235 ± 0.042 (0.150 to 0.318)

1

0.416

0.215

0.005

 

P <0.001

P <0.001

NS

 

n = 548

n = 329

n = 397

Second year BMS outcome

0.235 ± 0.047 (0.148 to 0.338)

0.293 ± 0.054 (0.174 to 0.379)

0.512 ± 0.038 (0.434 to 0.582)

1

0.359

0.080

P <0.001

NS

n = 329

n = 399

Finals outcome (London only)

0.182 ± 0.051 (0.081 to 0.280)

0.323 ± 0.052 (0.229 to 0.426)

0.244 ± 0.064 (0.107 to 0.357)

0.410 ± 0.052 (0.304 to 0.511)

1

0.084

NS

n = 261

On Specialist Register

-0.031 ± 0.062 (-0.146 to 0.090)

0.054 ± 0.063 (-0.064 to 0.176)

0.007 ± 0.079 (-0.142 to 0.156)

0.119 ± 0.077 (-0.052 to 0.255)

0.104 ± 0.074 (-0.038 to 0.250)

1

  1. Abbreviations: A-level, Advanced level; BMS, Basic medical sciences; GCSE, General Certificate of Secondary Education; MCMC, Markov Chain Monte Carlo; NS, not significant; O-level, Ordinary level.
  2. aCorrelations in entrants to medical school between measures of academic and professional attainment attainment in the 1980 Cohort study.
  3. bCorrelations above the diagonal are simple Pearson correlations (for example point-biserials, φ correlations. where a measure is binary or ordinal), and have different n values for various reasons.
  4. cCorrelations shown in bold are significant at P<0.05.
  5. dCorrelations in the lower triangle were calculated taking account of censoring, and for ordinal values are equivalent to tetrachoric/polychoric correlations.
  6. eValues are mean ± SD (95% CI) unless otherwise stated, and the 95% confidence intervals are the result of the final 2000 MCMC steps in a chain of 5000.