Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Challenges in cardiac device innovation: is neuroimaging an appropriate endpoint? Consensus from the 2013 Yale-UCL Cardiac Device Innovation Summit

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Mar 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Meller
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Holger Eggebrecht
10 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philipp Kahlert
4 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Meller
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philipp Kahlert
30 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Holger Eggebrecht
7 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Meller
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
19 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Meller
Resubmission - Version 6
19 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
22 Nov 2013 Editorially accepted
11 Dec 2013 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-11-257

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement