Skip to main content

Table 1 New dataset of images and classification of the different comparisons

From: Quantifiable diagnosis of muscular dystrophies and neurogenic atrophies through network analysis

Sample

Age (years)

Muscle

Morphological pattern evaluation

ALL 82cc

Control versus MD 82cc

Control versus NA 82cc

    

cc = 15, 16, 25, 29, 30, 32, 34, 62, 69

cc = 13, 18, 15, 27, 41

cc = 21, 33, 55

X03-1

45

Biceps

Normal

C

No D

No N

X06-1

18

Biceps

Normal

C

No D

No N

X11-1

12

Quadriceps

Normal

C

No D

No N

X12-1

6

Quadriceps

Normal

C

No D

No N

X01-1

55

Biceps

Dystrophic pattern

D

D

No N

X01-2

55

Biceps

Dystrophic pattern

D

D

No N

X01-3

55

Biceps

Dystrophic pattern

D

D

No N

X01-4

55

Biceps

Dystrophic pattern

D

D

No N

X01-5

55

Biceps

Dystrophic pattern

D

D

No N

X13-1

3 months

Quadriceps

Dystrophic pattern

D

D

N

X05-1

54

Gastrocnemius

NA-severe-pseudodystrophy

N

D

N

X02-1

37

Gastrocnemius

NA, only focal grouping

C

No D

No N

X02-2

37

Gastrocnemius

NA, only focal grouping

C

No D

No N

X04-1

47

Gastrocnemius

NA, slight-moderate

C

No D

N

X04-2

47

Gastrocnemius

NA, slight-moderate

C

No D

N

  1. Results of the classification of the three comparisons performed on different test samples. In these comparisons 82 characteristics were used in the feature selection step. The table shows the selected characteristics in each case. Cases where NDICIA was not able to classify the condition correctly are labeled in bold. ‘No D’ corresponds to cases where NA was classified as ‘not dystrophic’, and ‘No N’ the cases with fibrosis was classified as being ‘not neurogenic’ since there were only two options in these double comparisons. C, normal pattern, D, dystrophic pattern, N, neurogenic pattern.