Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative PCR (Xpert MTB/RIF) for tuberculous pericarditis compared to adenosine deaminase and unstimulated interferon-γ in a high burden setting: a prospective study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jan 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Padmapriya Banada
19 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - pierre goussard
15 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bongani Mawethu Mayosi
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bongani Mawethu Mayosi
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Padmapriya Banada
15 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - pierre goussard
19 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bongani Mawethu Mayosi
Resubmission - Version 5
19 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bongani Mawethu Mayosi
Resubmission - Version 7
23 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
28 May 2014 Editorially accepted
18 Jun 2014 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-12-101

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement