Performance of four computer-coded verbal autopsy methods for cause of death assignment compared with physician coding on 24,000 deaths in low- and middle-income countries
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Black|
|18 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pam Groenewald|
|2 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lukasz Aleksandrowicz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Black|
|7 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pam Groenewald|
|31 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lukasz Aleksandrowicz|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|4 Feb 2014||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-12-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.