From: In-/off-label use of biologic therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus
 | Drug | Type of molecule | RCT phase | Pros for use in SLE | Cons for use in SLE | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anti-B cell therapies | Rituximab | Chimeric anti-CD20 mAb | Phase III | • Significantly decreased anti-dsDNA antibody titers and increased complement levels vs. placebo. Significantly decreased lupus non-renal flares in Hispanic and African American patients | • Did not significantly improve lupus outcome in either renal or non-renal SLE in large cohorts of SLE patients | |
Ocrelizumab | Humanized anti-CD20 mAb | Phase III | • Significantly increased complement levels and decreased anti-dsDNA titers through week 48 vs. placebo | • No significant improvement in renal outcome | [15] | |
• Induced numerically (non-statistically) significant greater renal response vs. placebo | • Serious infections in treated patients vs. placebo when added to MMF | |||||
Epratuzumab | Humanized anti-CD22 mAb | Phase IIb | • Provided clinical improvement in patients receiving ≥2,400 mg cumulative dose | • No significant BILAG improvement after 12 weeks treatment vs. placebo | [5] | |
• Steroid-sparing effect | ||||||
Belimumab | Fully human anti-BlyS mAb | Phase III | • Significant improvement in moderate-persistent active SLE outcome and decreased flare rates in phase III RCTs (met primary endpoints) | • No BILAG assessment | ||
No data on CNS or severe renal involvement | ||||||
• Significant decrease in anti-dsDNA antibody titers | • No advantages by treatment continuation through week 76 (but in post-hoc analysis) | |||||
• Steroid-sparing effect | ||||||
Atacicept | Soluble fully human recombinant anti-APRIL fusion protein | Phase II | • Not availableb | • Serious infections and decreased immunoglobulin levels in patients receiving MMF or corticosteroids prior to atacicept | [6] | |
Anti-co-stimulatory molecules | Abatacept | CTLA4-Ig fusion protein | Phase IIb | • Reduced BILAG A polyarthritis flares in a phase IIb RCT | • Did not reduce overall disease flares vs. placebo in either renal or non-renal SLE | [10] |
IDEC-131 | Humanized anti-CD40 ligand mAb | Phase II | • Ameliorated SLEDAI in a phase II RCT | • No significant superiority to placebo | ||
• Increased risk of thromboembolic events | ||||||
Anti-cytokines therapies | Infliximab | Chimeric anti-TNF soluble mAb | No RCT performed | • Effective on refractory arthritis, nephritis and skin lesions in open-label studies | • Severe adverse events following treatment, for example, thrombosis, infections | |
• Reduction in SLEDAI and SLICC-DI in pilot studies after short-term induction treatment | • Induction of pathological/pathogenetic autoantibodies (anti-dsDNA, anti-phospholipid antibodies) | |||||
• Increase in IFNα levels following protracted administration | ||||||
Tocilizumab | Humanized IgG1 anti-IL6R mAb | Phase I | • Significantly reduced SELENA-SLEDAI score (main improvement on arthritis) | • Neutropenia and serious infections | [18] | |
• Significantly reduced IgG anti-dsDNA antibody levels | • No data on severe SLE | |||||
Anakinra | Non glycosylated IL1Ra | No RCT performed | • Improved arthritis in an open-label trial | • No long-lasting effect | [4] | |
• No extensive data are available due to very low patients number | ||||||
Sifalimumab | Human mAb blocking multiple IFNα subtypes | Phase I | • Significantly reduced the rate of disease flares vs. placebo | • No data on severe SLE | [19] | |
• Lower request of immunosupressor vs. placebo |