Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners’ confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Oct 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars L Gustafsson|
|21 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jørund Straand|
|20 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Celine Buffel du Vaure|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars L Gustafsson|
|24 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jørund Straand|
|17 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Celine Buffel du Vaure|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|21 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Celine Buffel du Vaure|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|21 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|25 Mar 2014||Editorially accepted|
|28 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-12-69|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.