Location/endemicity
|
Ivermectin treatments
|
Mean treatment coverage % (range)
|
---|
|
No. of communities
|
Year of first treatment
|
No. treatments Median (range)
| |
---|
Río Cayapas:
| | | | |
Hyperendemic
|
31
|
1991–1996*
|
22 (13–22)
|
84.8 (49.9–95.3)
|
Mesoendemic
|
9
|
1991
|
16 (16–16)
|
86.7 (74.2–97.7)
|
Hypoendemic
|
7
|
1991–1993
|
16 (14–16)
|
84.7 (71.0–94.4)
|
Río Onzole:
| | | | |
Hyperendemic
|
3
|
1991–1992
|
16 (15–17)
|
84.5 (63.4–98.1)
|
Mesoendemic
|
1
|
1991
|
16
|
90.3 (72.7–100)
|
Hypoendemic
|
13
|
1991–1993
|
15 (15–16)
|
87.2 68.5–97.2)
|
Río Santiago:
| | | | |
Hyperendemic
|
8
|
1990–1991†
|
19 (17–19)
|
90.7 (78.1–98.7)
|
Mesoendemic
|
4
|
1990
|
18 (17–19)
|
87.7 (65.4–99.0)
|
Hypoendemic
|
23
|
1990–1991
|
16 (16–17)
|
88.9 (81.1–100)
|
Satelite foci:
| | | | |
Mesoendemic
|
9
|
1991–1993
|
18 (14–19)
|
83.2 (37.3–97.9)
|
Hypoendemic
|
11
|
1990–1997
|
13 (11–17)
|
89.9 (48.7–98.4)
|
- *In the Río Cayapas first treatments with ivermectin were provided in the hyperendemic communities in the following years: 1991 (23 communities), 1992 (1), 1995 (1), and 1996 (6). †In the Río Santiago first treatments with ivermectin were provided in the hyperendemic communities in the following years: 1990 (7 communities) and 1991 (1 community).